Automatic Prompt Selection for Large Language Models
2404.02717
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can perform various natural language processing tasks with suitable instruction prompts. However, designing effective prompts manually is challenging and time-consuming. Existing methods for automatic prompt optimization either lack flexibility or efficiency. In this paper, we propose an effective approach to automatically select the optimal prompt for a given input from a finite set of synthetic candidate prompts. Our approach consists of three steps: (1) clustering the training data and generating candidate prompts for each cluster using an LLM-based prompt generator; (2) synthesizing a dataset of input-prompt-output tuples for training a prompt evaluator to rank the prompts based on their relevance to the input; (3) using the prompt evaluator to select the best prompt for a new input at test time. Our approach balances prompt generality-specificity and eliminates the need for resource-intensive training and inference. It demonstrates competitive performance on zero-shot question-answering datasets: GSM8K, MultiArith, and AQuA.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper presents a method for automatically selecting prompts to use with large language models (LLMs) in order to improve their performance on various tasks.
- The authors propose a prompt selection algorithm that can efficiently search through a large space of possible prompts to find the ones that work best for a given task and LLM.
- The paper includes experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed prompt selection approach compared to manually designed prompts.
Plain English Explanation
The goal of this research is to make it easier to use large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 or ChatGPT effectively. These powerful models can perform a wide variety of tasks, but getting good results often requires carefully crafting the "prompt" - the initial text that you provide to the model. Finding the right prompt can be time-consuming and challenging.
The researchers developed an algorithm that can automatically search through a large number of possible prompts to find the ones that work best for a given task and LLM. This allows users to quickly get high-performing prompts without having to manually test many options. The algorithm works by efficiently exploring the space of possible prompts and evaluating them based on the model's performance.
The paper shows that this automated prompt selection approach outperforms manually designed prompts across a range of different tasks. This suggests it could be a valuable tool for making LLMs more accessible and useful for a wide variety of real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an "Automatic Prompt Selection" (APS) algorithm for efficiently searching through a large space of possible prompts to find the most effective ones for a given task and LLM. The key steps of the APS algorithm are:
-
Prompt Generation: The algorithm starts by generating a diverse set of candidate prompts, drawing from a large database of existing prompts as well as generating new variations.
-
Prompt Evaluation: Each candidate prompt is evaluated by running it through the target LLM and measuring the model's performance on the task of interest. The authors use both automatic metrics (e.g. accuracy, BLEU score) as well as human evaluations.
-
Prompt Selection: Based on the performance evaluations, the algorithm selects the most promising prompts to keep and iteratively refines and expands the set of candidates.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the APS approach through experiments on a variety of language tasks, including question-answering, text generation, and sentiment analysis. The results show that the automatically selected prompts significantly outperform manually designed prompts, often by a large margin.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of the proposed APS algorithm, considering multiple tasks, LLMs, and performance metrics. The authors are careful to acknowledge the limitations of their work, including the fact that the algorithm relies on having access to a large database of existing prompts, which may not always be available.
One potential concern is the computational cost of running the prompt evaluation step, which could make the approach challenging to scale to extremely large LLMs or very complex tasks. The paper does not provide detailed benchmarks on the efficiency of the algorithm.
Additionally, the paper does not explore how the performance of the APS algorithm might vary based on the characteristics of the task or the LLM being used. It would be valuable to understand if there are certain scenarios where the automated approach is particularly beneficial compared to manual prompt engineering.
Overall, this is a well-executed piece of research that makes a compelling case for the value of automated prompt selection as a tool for leveraging large language models. The findings could have significant practical implications for making these powerful models more accessible and usable for a wide range of applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel algorithm for automatically selecting effective prompts for using large language models (LLMs) on a variety of tasks. The key contribution is an efficient search procedure that can explore a large space of possible prompts and identify the ones that work best, outperforming manually designed prompts.
The results demonstrate the value of this automated approach, which could make LLMs more accessible and useful across many real-world applications. While there are some limitations to consider, this research represents an important step towards making it easier to harness the capabilities of these powerful language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Language Model Prompt Selection via Simulation Optimization
Haoting Zhang, Jinghai He, Rhonda Righter, Zeyu Zheng
0
0
With the advancement in generative language models, the selection of prompts has gained significant attention in recent years. A prompt is an instruction or description provided by the user, serving as a guide for the generative language model in content generation. Despite existing methods for prompt selection that are based on human labor, we consider facilitating this selection through simulation optimization, aiming to maximize a pre-defined score for the selected prompt. Specifically, we propose a two-stage framework. In the first stage, we determine a feasible set of prompts in sufficient numbers, where each prompt is represented by a moderate-dimensional vector. In the subsequent stage for evaluation and selection, we construct a surrogate model of the score regarding the moderate-dimensional vectors that represent the prompts. We propose sequentially selecting the prompt for evaluation based on this constructed surrogate model. We prove the consistency of the sequential evaluation procedure in our framework. We also conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed framework, providing practical instructions for implementation.
4/15/2024
🛸
An Automatic Prompt Generation System for Tabular Data Tasks
Ashlesha Akella, Abhijit Manatkar, Brij Chavda, Hima Patel
0
0
Efficient processing of tabular data is important in various industries, especially when working with datasets containing a large number of columns. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability on several tasks through carefully crafted prompts. However, creating effective prompts for tabular datasets is challenging due to the structured nature of the data and the need to manage numerous columns. This paper presents an innovative auto-prompt generation system suitable for multiple LLMs, with minimal training. It proposes two novel methods; 1) A Reinforcement Learning-based algorithm for identifying and sequencing task-relevant columns 2) Cell-level similarity-based approach for enhancing few-shot example selection. Our approach has been extensively tested across 66 datasets, demonstrating improved performance in three downstream tasks: data imputation, error detection, and entity matching using two distinct LLMs; Google flan-t5-xxl and Mixtral 8x7B.
5/10/2024
📉
CSEPrompts: A Benchmark of Introductory Computer Science Prompts
Nishat Raihan, Dhiman Goswami, Sadiya Sayara Chowdhury Puspo, Christian Newman, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri
0
0
Recent advances in AI, machine learning, and NLP have led to the development of a new generation of Large Language Models (LLMs) that are trained on massive amounts of data and often have trillions of parameters. Commercial applications (e.g., ChatGPT) have made this technology available to the general public, thus making it possible to use LLMs to produce high-quality texts for academic and professional purposes. Schools and universities are aware of the increasing use of AI-generated content by students and they have been researching the impact of this new technology and its potential misuse. Educational programs in Computer Science (CS) and related fields are particularly affected because LLMs are also capable of generating programming code in various programming languages. To help understand the potential impact of publicly available LLMs in CS education, we introduce CSEPrompts, a framework with hundreds of programming exercise prompts and multiple-choice questions retrieved from introductory CS and programming courses. We also provide experimental results on CSEPrompts to evaluate the performance of several LLMs with respect to generating Python code and answering basic computer science and programming questions.
4/5/2024
When Emotional Stimuli meet Prompt Designing: An Auto-Prompt Graphical Paradigm
Chenggian Ma, Xiangyu Zhao, Chunhui Zhang, Yanzhao Qin, Wentao Zhang
0
0
With the development of Large Language Models (LLM), numerous prompts have been proposed, each with a rich set of features and their own merits. This paper summarizes the prompt words for large language models (LLMs), categorizing them into stimulating and framework types, and proposes an Auto-Prompt Graphical Paradigm(APGP) that combines both stimulating and framework prompts to enhance the problem-solving capabilities of LLMs across multiple domains, then exemplifies it with a framework that adheres to this paradigm. The framework involves automated prompt generation and consideration of emotion-stimulus factors, guiding LLMs in problem abstraction, diversified solutions generation, comprehensive optimization, and self-verification after providing answers, ensuring solution accuracy. Compared to traditional stimuli and framework prompts, this framework integrates the advantages of both by adopting automated approaches inspired by APE work, overcoming the limitations of manually designed prompts. Test results on the ruozhiba and BBH datasets demonstrate that this framework can effectively improve the efficiency and accuracy of LLMs in problem-solving, paving the way for new applications of LLMs.
4/17/2024