0
0
XXAI: Towards eXplicitly eXplainable Artificial Intelligence
Overview
- Concerns about the reliability and safety of artificial intelligence (AI) based on sub-symbolic neural networks due to the "black box" problem - their decisions cannot be explicitly explained.
- Symbolic AI has the "white box" nature and can ensure the reliability and safety of its decisions, but faces other challenges that prevent widespread use.
- To solve the "black box" problem, the authors propose eXplicitly eXplainable AI (XXAI) - a fully transparent "white box" AI based on deterministic logical cellular automata.
Plain English Explanation
The paper addresses a key challenge with modern AI systems - the "black box" problem. Sub-symbolic neural networks, which power many state-of-the-art AI models, make decisions in ways that are difficult to explain explicitly. This raises concerns about the reliability and safety of these AI systems.
In contrast, symbolic AI systems are more "white box" - their decision-making process can be clearly understood. However, symbolic AI faces other hurdles that have prevented it from becoming as widely used as neural networks.
To solve the "black box" problem, the authors propose a new approach called eXplicitly eXplainable AI (XXAI). XXAI is based on deterministic logical cellular automata, where the rules governing the system's behavior are derived from first principles of the relevant domain. This allows XXAI to be a fully transparent "white box" AI system, whose decision-making can be explicitly explained.
The authors provide examples of successfully using XXAI to verify the reliability, security, and ethics of sub-symbolic neural network solutions, both during training and in the final system. They believe XXAI represents a promising path forward to address the concerns around the opacity of modern AI.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents eXplicitly eXplainable AI (XXAI) as a solution to the "black box" problem of modern AI systems based on sub-symbolic neural networks. XXAI is a "white box" AI approach built on deterministic logical cellular automata, where the rules governing the system's behavior are derived from the first principles of the relevant domain.
A cellular automaton is a computational model that implements parallel multi-level logical inference, from the local interactions of the elemental base up to the system as a whole. By grounding the automaton's rules in the general theory of the domain, XXAI can provide a transparent, explainable decision-making process.
The authors demonstrate the successful application of XXAI to automatically verify the reliability, security, and ethics of sub-symbolic neural network solutions, both during training and in the final system. This approach sets a precedent for addressing the opacity concerns around modern AI.
The paper also discusses the theoretical and methodological foundations for further developing XXAI, as well as the prospects for its future implementation. Key challenges that have historically limited the widespread use of symbolic AI, such as the opacity of mathematical models and natural language terms, as well as the combinatorial explosion of search capabilities, are highlighted as areas that XXAI aims to overcome.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the "black box" problem of modern AI systems. By grounding XXAI in the first principles of the relevant domain, the authors have developed a "white box" AI that can provide explicit explanations for its decision-making process.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific challenges and limitations of XXAI. For example, the authors mention the historical issues that have hindered the adoption of symbolic AI, such as the opacity of mathematical models and natural language terms, as well as the combinatorial explosion of search capabilities. But they do not explore how XXAI plans to overcome these challenges in practice.
Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more critical assessment of the potential downsides or unintended consequences of XXAI. While the authors highlight the ability of XXAI to verify the reliability, security, and ethics of sub-symbolic neural networks, they do not discuss any potential shortcomings or areas for further research.
Explainable AI (XAI) is a rapidly evolving field, and it would be valuable for the paper to situate XXAI within the broader context of XAI research and discuss how it compares to or builds upon other approaches, such as Causal-AI or Optimal Explanations.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach called eXplicitly eXplainable AI (XXAI) to address the "black box" problem of modern AI systems. By grounding XXAI in the first principles of the relevant domain, the authors have developed a fully transparent "white box" AI system that can provide explicit explanations for its decision-making.
The successful application of XXAI to automatically verify the reliability, security, and ethics of sub-symbolic neural network solutions sets a precedent for addressing the opacity concerns around modern AI. The paper lays the theoretical and methodological foundations for further developing XXAI, which could potentially pave the way for more reliable and trustworthy AI systems in the future.
However, the paper could benefit from a more critical assessment of the challenges and limitations of XXAI, as well as a deeper exploration of how it relates to and builds upon other approaches in the rapidly evolving field of Explainable AI (XAI). Nonetheless, the authors' work represents a significant contribution to the ongoing efforts to make AI systems more transparent and accountable.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction
Melkamu Mersha, Khang Lam, Joseph Wood, Ali AlShami, Jugal Kalita
Artificial intelligence models encounter significant challenges due to their black-box nature, particularly in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses these challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. However, there remains a gap in the literature as there are no comprehensive reviews that delve into the detailed mathematical representations, design methodologies of XAI models, and other associated aspects. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas. The survey is aimed at XAI researchers, XAI practitioners, AI model developers, and XAI beneficiaries who are interested in enhancing the trustworthiness, transparency, accountability, and fairness of their AI models.
Read more10/4/2024
0
Formal Explanations for Neuro-Symbolic AI
Sushmita Paul, Jinqiang Yu, Jip J. Dekker, Alexey Ignatiev, Peter J. Stuckey
Despite the practical success of Artificial Intelligence (AI), current neural AI algorithms face two significant issues. First, the decisions made by neural architectures are often prone to bias and brittleness. Second, when a chain of reasoning is required, neural systems often perform poorly. Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence is a promising approach that tackles these (and other) weaknesses by combining the power of neural perception and symbolic reasoning. Meanwhile, the success of AI has made it critical to understand its behaviour, leading to the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). While neuro-symbolic AI systems have important advantages over purely neural AI, we still need to explain their actions, which are obscured by the interactions of the neural and symbolic components. To address the issue, this paper proposes a formal approach to explaining the decisions of neuro-symbolic systems. The approach hinges on the use of formal abductive explanations and on solving the neuro-symbolic explainability problem hierarchically. Namely, it first computes a formal explanation for the symbolic component of the system, which serves to identify a subset of the individual parts of neural information that needs to be explained. This is followed by explaining only those individual neural inputs, independently of each other, which facilitates succinctness of hierarchical formal explanations and helps to increase the overall performance of the approach. Experimental results for a few complex reasoning tasks demonstrate practical efficiency of the proposed approach, in comparison to purely neural systems, from the perspective of explanation size, explanation time, training time, model sizes, and the quality of explanations reported.
Read more10/21/2024
0
Towards Symbolic XAI -- Explanation Through Human Understandable Logical Relationships Between Features
Thomas Schnake, Farnoush Rezaei Jafari, Jonas Lederer, Ping Xiong, Shinichi Nakajima, Stefan Gugler, Gr'egoire Montavon, Klaus-Robert Muller
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in fostering transparency and trust in AI systems, where traditional XAI approaches typically offer one level of abstraction for explanations, often in the form of heatmaps highlighting single or multiple input features. However, we ask whether abstract reasoning or problem-solving strategies of a model may also be relevant, as these align more closely with how humans approach solutions to problems. We propose a framework, called Symbolic XAI, that attributes relevance to symbolic queries expressing logical relationships between input features, thereby capturing the abstract reasoning behind a model's predictions. The methodology is built upon a simple yet general multi-order decomposition of model predictions. This decomposition can be specified using higher-order propagation-based relevance methods, such as GNN-LRP, or perturbation-based explanation methods commonly used in XAI. The effectiveness of our framework is demonstrated in the domains of natural language processing (NLP), vision, and quantum chemistry (QC), where abstract symbolic domain knowledge is abundant and of significant interest to users. The Symbolic XAI framework provides an understanding of the model's decision-making process that is both flexible for customization by the user and human-readable through logical formulas.
Read more10/2/2024
🧠
0
Explaining Explaining
Sergei Nirenburg, Marjorie McShane, Kenneth W. Goodman, Sanjay Oruganti
Explanation is key to people having confidence in high-stakes AI systems. However, machine-learning-based systems -- which account for almost all current AI -- can't explain because they are usually black boxes. The explainable AI (XAI) movement hedges this problem by redefining explanation. The human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI) movement identifies the explanation-oriented needs of users but can't fulfill them because of its commitment to machine learning. In order to achieve the kinds of explanations needed by real people operating in critical domains, we must rethink how to approach AI. We describe a hybrid approach to developing cognitive agents that uses a knowledge-based infrastructure supplemented by data obtained through machine learning when applicable. These agents will serve as assistants to humans who will bear ultimate responsibility for the decisions and actions of the human-robot team. We illustrate the explanatory potential of such agents using the under-the-hood panels of a demonstration system in which a team of simulated robots collaborate on a search task assigned by a human.
Read more9/30/2024