# What makes math problems hard for reinforcement learning: a case study

2

Sign in to get full access

## Overview

- Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique for solving complex problems, but it can struggle with certain types of mathematical problems
- This paper examines the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture, a long-standing problem in topology, and uses it as a case study to understand why some math problems are challenging for RL
- The researchers investigate the performance of various RL algorithms on the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture and uncover insights into the characteristics that make certain math problems difficult for RL

## Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of artificial intelligence that learns to solve problems by trial and error. It has been used to master games like chess and Go, as well as tackle real-world challenges like optimizing supply chains. However, the researchers in this paper found that RL can struggle with certain types of mathematical problems, like the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture.

The Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture is a long-standing problem in the field of topology, which is the study of the properties of shapes that remain unchanged when they are stretched, bent, or deformed. The researchers used this problem as a case study to better understand the characteristics that make some math problems difficult for RL algorithms to solve.

By testing various RL algorithms on the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture, the researchers gained insights into the challenges RL faces when dealing with inherently mathematical difficulty. They found that the problem's complex structure and the need for sophisticated reasoning skills, such as understanding the Pontryagin perspective, made it particularly challenging for RL to solve effectively.

## Technical Explanation

The paper begins by introducing the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture, a long-standing problem in topology that has proved to be difficult for RL algorithms to solve. The researchers then describe their experimental setup, where they tested various RL algorithms, including deep Q-learning, proximal policy optimization, and other techniques, on the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture.

The results of the experiments showed that the RL algorithms struggled to find solutions to the problem, even after extensive training. The researchers attribute this difficulty to the complex structure of the conjecture and the need for advanced reasoning skills, such as understanding graph theory and combinatorial properties, which are not easily captured by standard RL approaches.

The paper also discusses the potential implications of these findings, suggesting that the challenges faced by RL on the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture may be indicative of broader limitations in RL's ability to solve certain types of mathematical problems. The researchers propose that further research is needed to develop RL algorithms that can more effectively handle the inherent mathematical difficulty of problems like the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture.

## Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable case study on the limitations of reinforcement learning when it comes to solving complex mathematical problems. The researchers' focus on the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture, a long-standing problem in topology, is a wise choice, as it allows them to delve into the specific characteristics that make certain math problems difficult for RL.

However, the paper could have benefited from a more comprehensive discussion of the potential reasons why RL struggles with these types of problems. While the researchers mention the need for advanced reasoning skills, such as understanding graph theory and combinatorial properties, they could have explored this idea in greater depth. Additionally, the paper could have considered other factors, such as the vast search space of possible solutions, the lack of clear feedback signals, or the inherent abstraction required to solve these types of problems.

Furthermore, the paper could have provided more guidance on how the research community might address these limitations. While the researchers suggest that further research is needed, they could have offered more specific recommendations or ideas for developing RL algorithms that are better equipped to handle the challenges posed by inherently mathematical problems.

## Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable case study on the limitations of reinforcement learning when it comes to solving complex mathematical problems. By examining the performance of RL algorithms on the Andrewsâ€“Curtis conjecture, the researchers have uncovered insights into the characteristics that make certain math problems difficult for RL to solve effectively.

The findings of this study have important implications for the field of artificial intelligence, as they suggest that RL may not be well-suited for tackling all types of mathematical problems. This underscores the need for continued research and development of RL algorithms that can better handle the inherent mathematical difficulty of certain problems, as well as the potential integration of RL with other techniques, such as symbolic reasoning, to address these challenges.

Overall, this paper serves as a thought-provoking contribution to the ongoing discussion around the strengths and limitations of reinforcement learning, and it highlights the importance of carefully considering the nature of the problem at hand when selecting and applying AI techniques.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

## Related Papers

2

### What makes math problems hard for reinforcement learning: a case study

Ali Shehper, Anibal M. Medina-Mardones, Bart{l}omiej Lewandowski, Angus Gruen, Piotr Kucharski, Sergei Gukov

Using a long-standing conjecture from combinatorial group theory, we explore, from multiple angles, the challenges of finding rare instances carrying disproportionately high rewards. Based on lessons learned in the mathematical context defined by the Andrews-Curtis conjecture, we propose algorithmic improvements that can be relevant in other domains with ultra-sparse reward problems. Although our case study can be formulated as a game, its shortest winning sequences are potentially $10^6$ or $10^9$ times longer than those encountered in chess. In the process of our study, we demonstrate that one of the potential counterexamples due to Akbulut and Kirby, whose status escaped direct mathematical methods for 39 years, is stably AC-trivial.

Read more8/29/2024

đźŚ€

0

### Blocking Bandits

Soumya Basu, Rajat Sen, Sujay Sanghavi, Sanjay Shakkottai

We consider a novel stochastic multi-armed bandit setting, where playing an arm makes it unavailable for a fixed number of time slots thereafter. This models situations where reusing an arm too often is undesirable (e.g. making the same product recommendation repeatedly) or infeasible (e.g. compute job scheduling on machines). We show that with prior knowledge of the rewards and delays of all the arms, the problem of optimizing cumulative reward does not admit any pseudo-polynomial time algorithm (in the number of arms) unless randomized exponential time hypothesis is false, by mapping to the PINWHEEL scheduling problem. Subsequently, we show that a simple greedy algorithm that plays the available arm with the highest reward is asymptotically $(1-1/e)$ optimal. When the rewards are unknown, we design a UCB based algorithm which is shown to have $c log T + o(log T)$ cumulative regret against the greedy algorithm, leveraging the free exploration of arms due to the unavailability. Finally, when all the delays are equal the problem reduces to Combinatorial Semi-bandits providing us with a lower bound of $c' log T+ omega(log T)$.

Read more7/31/2024

0

### A Systematization of the Wagner Framework: Graph Theory Conjectures and Reinforcement Learning

Flora Angileri, Giulia Lombardi, Andrea Fois, Renato Faraone, Carlo Metta, Michele Salvi, Luigi Amedeo Bianchi, Marco Fantozzi, Silvia Giulia Galfr`e, Daniele Pavesi, Maurizio Parton, Francesco Morandin

In 2021, Adam Zsolt Wagner proposed an approach to disprove conjectures in graph theory using Reinforcement Learning (RL). Wagner's idea can be framed as follows: consider a conjecture, such as a certain quantity f(G) < 0 for every graph G; one can then play a single-player graph-building game, where at each turn the player decides whether to add an edge or not. The game ends when all edges have been considered, resulting in a certain graph G_T, and f(G_T) is the final score of the game; RL is then used to maximize this score. This brilliant idea is as simple as innovative, and it lends itself to systematic generalization. Several different single-player graph-building games can be employed, along with various RL algorithms. Moreover, RL maximizes the cumulative reward, allowing for step-by-step rewards instead of a single final score, provided the final cumulative reward represents the quantity of interest f(G_T). In this paper, we discuss these and various other choices that can be significant in Wagner's framework. As a contribution to this systematization, we present four distinct single-player graph-building games. Each game employs both a step-by-step reward system and a single final score. We also propose a principled approach to select the most suitable neural network architecture for any given conjecture, and introduce a new dataset of graphs labeled with their Laplacian spectra. Furthermore, we provide a counterexample for a conjecture regarding the sum of the matching number and the spectral radius, which is simpler than the example provided in Wagner's original paper. The games have been implemented as environments in the Gymnasium framework, and along with the dataset, are available as open-source supplementary materials.

Read more6/19/2024

0

### Learning Efficient Recursive Numeral Systems via Reinforcement Learning

Jonathan D. Thomas, Andrea Silvi, Devdatt Dubhashi, Emil Carlsson, Moa Johansson

The emergence of mathematical concepts, such as number systems, is an understudied area in AI for mathematics and reasoning. It has previously been shown Carlsson et al. (2021) that by using reinforcement learning (RL), agents can derive simple approximate and exact-restricted numeral systems. However, it is a major challenge to show how more complex recursive numeral systems, similar to the one utilised in English, could arise via a simple learning mechanism such as RL. Here, we introduce an approach towards deriving a mechanistic explanation of the emergence of recursive number systems where we consider an RL agent which directly optimizes a lexicon under a given meta-grammar. Utilising a slightly modified version of the seminal meta-grammar of Hurford (1975), we demonstrate that our RL agent can effectively modify the lexicon towards Pareto-optimal configurations which are comparable to those observed within human numeral systems.

Read more9/12/2024