A Watermark for Large Language Models

2301.10226

YC

4

Reddit

88

Published 5/3/2024 by John Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz, Ian Miers, Tom Goldstein

💬

Abstract

Potential harms of large language models can be mitigated by watermarking model output, i.e., embedding signals into generated text that are invisible to humans but algorithmically detectable from a short span of tokens. We propose a watermarking framework for proprietary language models. The watermark can be embedded with negligible impact on text quality, and can be detected using an efficient open-source algorithm without access to the language model API or parameters. The watermark works by selecting a randomized set of green tokens before a word is generated, and then softly promoting use of green tokens during sampling. We propose a statistical test for detecting the watermark with interpretable p-values, and derive an information-theoretic framework for analyzing the sensitivity of the watermark. We test the watermark using a multi-billion parameter model from the Open Pretrained Transformer (OPT) family, and discuss robustness and security.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • The paper proposes a method to embed watermarks into the output of large language models, which can help mitigate potential harms from misuse.
  • The watermark is invisible to humans but can be algorithmically detected, allowing the source of the text to be identified.
  • The watermarking process has a negligible impact on the quality of the generated text and can be detected using an open-source algorithm without access to the model itself.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a way to "watermark" the text generated by large language models, such as GPT-3 or OpenAI's language models. A watermark is a hidden signal that can be detected, similar to how a watermark can be seen in certain types of paper.

The key idea is to subtly modify the language model's output in a way that is unnoticeable to humans, but can be detected by a special algorithm. This allows the source of the text to be traced back to the original language model, even if the text is shared or used elsewhere.

For example, imagine a scenario where someone tries to pass off text generated by a large language model as their own original writing. The watermarking system proposed in this paper could help identify that the text was actually generated by the language model, preventing the deception.

The watermarking process works by randomly selecting certain words in the generated text and slightly biasing the language model to use those words. This creates a statistical pattern in the text that can be detected by an analysis algorithm, but does not significantly affect the quality or readability of the output.

The paper tests this watermarking approach on a large, multi-billion parameter language model and discusses its robustness and security against attempts to remove or bypass the watermark. Overall, this research offers a promising way to trace the origin of text generated by powerful language models, which could help address potential misuse or abuse.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a watermarking framework for proprietary language models, where a randomized set of "green" tokens are softly promoted during the text generation process. This creates a statistical pattern in the output that can be detected by an efficient open-source algorithm, without requiring access to the language model's API or internal parameters.

The watermarking process works by selecting a set of green tokens before each word is generated, and then increasing the probability of those green tokens being used during the sampling process. This has a negligible impact on the overall quality and fluency of the generated text, as the language model is still free to choose the most appropriate words based on the context.

The paper introduces a statistical test for detecting the watermark, which provides interpretable p-values to quantify the confidence in the watermark detection. An information-theoretic framework is also developed to analyze the sensitivity of the watermark and understand the trade-offs between watermark strength and text quality.

The researchers evaluate the watermarking approach using a multi-billion parameter language model from the Open Pretrained Transformer (OPT) family. They discuss the robustness of the watermark against various attacks, such as fine-tuning the language model or attempting to remove the watermark, and explore the security implications of the proposed framework.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for watermarking the output of large language models, which could be a valuable tool for addressing concerns about the potential misuse of these powerful AI systems. The authors have carefully designed the watermarking process to have a minimal impact on the quality of the generated text, and the proposed detection algorithm is efficient and does not require access to the language model's internal structure.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that the watermark may be vulnerable to more sophisticated attacks, such as those that attempt to learn the watermarking pattern or generate text on specific topics to avoid detection.

Additionally, while the proposed watermarking framework is designed to be robust and efficient, there may be concerns about the broader implications of embedding hidden signals into language model outputs, and the potential for misuse or abuse of the watermarking technology itself.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in addressing the challenges posed by large language models, and the watermarking approach could be a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of these AI systems. However, continued research and careful consideration of the potential risks and limitations will be essential as this technology continues to evolve.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel watermarking framework for proprietary language models, which can help mitigate potential harms from the misuse of these powerful AI systems. The proposed watermarking approach embeds an invisible signal into the generated text that can be algorithmically detected, allowing the source of the text to be identified.

The watermarking process has a negligible impact on the quality of the generated text and can be detected using an efficient open-source algorithm, without requiring access to the language model's internal structure. This research offers a promising solution for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models, and could have important implications for addressing concerns about the potential misuse of these AI systems.

While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research, the watermarking approach represents a significant step forward in the ongoing efforts to develop safe and responsible AI technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models

Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models

Yepeng Liu, Yuheng Bu

YC

0

Reddit

0

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to increasing concerns about the misuse of AI-generated text, and watermarking for LLM-generated text has emerged as a potential solution. However, it is challenging to generate high-quality watermarked text while maintaining strong security, robustness, and the ability to detect watermarks without prior knowledge of the prompt or model. This paper proposes an adaptive watermarking strategy to address this problem. To improve the text quality and maintain robustness, we adaptively add watermarking to token distributions with high entropy measured using an auxiliary model and keep the low entropy token distributions untouched. For the sake of security and to further minimize the watermark's impact on text quality, instead of using a fixed green/red list generated from a random secret key, which can be vulnerable to decryption and forgery, we adaptively scale up the output logits in proportion based on the semantic embedding of previously generated text using a well designed semantic mapping model. Our experiments involving various LLMs demonstrate that our approach achieves comparable robustness performance to existing watermark methods. Additionally, the text generated by our method has perplexity comparable to that of emph{un-watermarked} LLMs while maintaining security even under various attacks.

Read more

6/11/2024

💬

Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models

Rohith Kuditipudi, John Thickstun, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Percy Liang

YC

0

Reddit

0

We propose a methodology for planting watermarks in text from an autoregressive language model that are robust to perturbations without changing the distribution over text up to a certain maximum generation budget. We generate watermarked text by mapping a sequence of random numbers -- which we compute using a randomized watermark key -- to a sample from the language model. To detect watermarked text, any party who knows the key can align the text to the random number sequence. We instantiate our watermark methodology with two sampling schemes: inverse transform sampling and exponential minimum sampling. We apply these watermarks to three language models -- OPT-1.3B, LLaMA-7B and Alpaca-7B -- to experimentally validate their statistical power and robustness to various paraphrasing attacks. Notably, for both the OPT-1.3B and LLaMA-7B models, we find we can reliably detect watermarked text ($p leq 0.01$) from $35$ tokens even after corrupting between $40$-$50%$ of the tokens via random edits (i.e., substitutions, insertions or deletions). For the Alpaca-7B model, we conduct a case study on the feasibility of watermarking responses to typical user instructions. Due to the lower entropy of the responses, detection is more difficult: around $25%$ of the responses -- whose median length is around $100$ tokens -- are detectable with $p leq 0.01$, and the watermark is also less robust to certain automated paraphrasing attacks we implement.

Read more

6/7/2024

📈

Learnable Linguistic Watermarks for Tracing Model Extraction Attacks on Large Language Models

Minhao Bai, Kaiyi Pang, Yongfeng Huang

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the rapidly evolving domain of artificial intelligence, safeguarding the intellectual property of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly crucial. Current watermarking techniques against model extraction attacks, which rely on signal insertion in model logits or post-processing of generated text, remain largely heuristic. We propose a novel method for embedding learnable linguistic watermarks in LLMs, aimed at tracing and preventing model extraction attacks. Our approach subtly modifies the LLM's output distribution by introducing controlled noise into token frequency distributions, embedding an statistically identifiable controllable watermark.We leverage statistical hypothesis testing and information theory, particularly focusing on Kullback-Leibler Divergence, to differentiate between original and modified distributions effectively. Our watermarking method strikes a delicate well balance between robustness and output quality, maintaining low false positive/negative rates and preserving the LLM's original performance.

Read more

5/3/2024

💬

On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models

John Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Manli Shu, Khalid Saifullah, Kezhi Kong, Kasun Fernando, Aniruddha Saha, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein

YC

0

Reddit

0

As LLMs become commonplace, machine-generated text has the potential to flood the internet with spam, social media bots, and valueless content. Watermarking is a simple and effective strategy for mitigating such harms by enabling the detection and documentation of LLM-generated text. Yet a crucial question remains: How reliable is watermarking in realistic settings in the wild? There, watermarked text may be modified to suit a user's needs, or entirely rewritten to avoid detection. We study the robustness of watermarked text after it is re-written by humans, paraphrased by a non-watermarked LLM, or mixed into a longer hand-written document. We find that watermarks remain detectable even after human and machine paraphrasing. While these attacks dilute the strength of the watermark, paraphrases are statistically likely to leak n-grams or even longer fragments of the original text, resulting in high-confidence detections when enough tokens are observed. For example, after strong human paraphrasing the watermark is detectable after observing 800 tokens on average, when setting a 1e-5 false positive rate. We also consider a range of new detection schemes that are sensitive to short spans of watermarked text embedded inside a large document, and we compare the robustness of watermarking to other kinds of detectors.

Read more

5/3/2024