Visibility into AI Agents

2401.13138

YC

2

Reddit

0

Published 4/11/2024 by Alan Chan, Carson Ezell, Max Kaufmann, Kevin Wei, Lewis Hammond, Herbie Bradley, Emma Bluemke, Nitarshan Rajkumar, David Krueger, Noam Kolt and 2 others
Visibility into AI Agents

Abstract

Increased delegation of commercial, scientific, governmental, and personal activities to AI agents -- systems capable of pursuing complex goals with limited supervision -- may exacerbate existing societal risks and introduce new risks. Understanding and mitigating these risks involves critically evaluating existing governance structures, revising and adapting these structures where needed, and ensuring accountability of key stakeholders. Information about where, why, how, and by whom certain AI agents are used, which we refer to as visibility, is critical to these objectives. In this paper, we assess three categories of measures to increase visibility into AI agents: agent identifiers, real-time monitoring, and activity logging. For each, we outline potential implementations that vary in intrusiveness and informativeness. We analyze how the measures apply across a spectrum of centralized through decentralized deployment contexts, accounting for various actors in the supply chain including hardware and software service providers. Finally, we discuss the implications of our measures for privacy and concentration of power. Further work into understanding the measures and mitigating their negative impacts can help to build a foundation for the governance of AI agents.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper discusses the need for monitoring the deployment of AI agents to ensure transparency and oversight.
  • It examines the risks associated with AI agents, such as malicious use, unintended consequences, and lack of accountability.
  • The paper proposes a framework for monitoring AI agents throughout their deployment to mitigate these risks and maintain public trust.

Plain English Explanation

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more prevalent in our lives, it's crucial to ensure they are being used responsibly and safely. This paper focuses on the need to closely monitor the deployment of AI "agents" - autonomous programs that can take actions on our behalf.

The researchers outline several key risks associated with AI agents. They could potentially be used for malicious purposes, like manipulating information or exploiting vulnerabilities. Even when deployed with good intentions, AI agents may have unintended consequences that harm individuals or society. And without proper oversight, there may be a lack of accountability when things go wrong.

To address these concerns, the paper proposes a framework for continuously monitoring AI agents throughout their deployment. This would involve tracking the agents' actions, outputs, and impact, and making this information transparent to the public. The goal is to maintain visibility into how AI systems are being used in the real world, empowering people to understand and trust the technology.

By establishing clear monitoring practices, the researchers hope to enable more responsible development and deployment of AI agents. This could help build public confidence in AI and ensure these powerful technologies are used to benefit humanity, rather than cause harm.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for monitoring the deployment of AI agents to address concerns around transparency, accountability, and unintended consequences. It begins by outlining several key risks associated with the use of AI agents:

  1. Malicious Use: AI agents could be exploited for harmful or deceptive purposes, such as manipulating information, violating privacy, or targeting vulnerabilities.

  2. Unintended Consequences: Even well-intentioned AI agents may have unforeseen impacts that negatively affect individuals or society.

  3. Lack of Accountability: Without proper oversight, it may be difficult to assign responsibility when AI agents cause harm or make mistakes.

To mitigate these risks, the researchers propose a framework for continuously monitoring the deployment of AI agents. This would involve tracking the agents' actions, outputs, and impacts, and making this information publicly available. The goal is to maintain visibility into how these AI systems are being used in the real world, empowering people to understand and trust the technology.

The paper discusses various technical approaches for implementing this monitoring framework, such as using distributed AI agents as a means to achieve transparency and leveraging AI agents to enhance biomedical discovery. The researchers also highlight the importance of designing AI agents with transparency and accountability in mind from the outset, as part of a broader pursuit of trustworthy AI.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the need to closely monitor the deployment of AI agents to ensure transparency and oversight. The researchers have identified several important risks that must be addressed, and their proposed framework for continuous monitoring is a promising approach.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical and practical challenges of implementing such a system. Questions remain about the feasibility and scalability of continuously tracking and reporting on the actions and impacts of AI agents in complex, real-world environments.

Additionally, the paper does not explore potential unintended consequences or limitations of the monitoring framework itself. There may be concerns around privacy, security, or the potential for the monitoring system to be misused or gamed by bad actors.

Further research and pilot studies would be needed to fully validate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed framework. The researchers should also consider engaging with a broader range of stakeholders, including AI developers, policymakers, and the general public, to gather feedback and address any ethical or societal concerns.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the critical need for increased transparency and oversight in the deployment of AI agents. By proposing a framework for continuous monitoring, the researchers aim to mitigate the risks of malicious use, unintended consequences, and lack of accountability.

Implementing such a monitoring system could help build public trust in AI technologies and ensure they are used to benefit society. However, significant technical and practical challenges remain, and further research is needed to fully validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach.

Ongoing dialogue and collaboration between AI developers, policymakers, and the public will be essential to navigate the complex issues surrounding the responsible development and deployment of AI agents.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔎

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Promote Awareness in Augmented Reality Systems

Wangfan Li, Rohit Mallick, Carlos Toxtli-Hernandez, Christopher Flathmann, Nathan J. McNeese

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have permeated through an array of different immersive environments, including virtual, augmented, and mixed realities. AI brings a wealth of potential that centers on its ability to critically analyze environments, identify relevant artifacts to a goal or action, and then autonomously execute decision-making strategies to optimize the reward-to-risk ratio. However, the inherent benefits of AI are not without disadvantages as the autonomy and communication methodology can interfere with the human's awareness of their environment. More specifically in the case of autonomy, the relevant human-computer interaction literature cites that high autonomy results in an out-of-the-loop experience for the human such that they are not aware of critical artifacts or situational changes that require their attention. At the same time, low autonomy of an AI system can limit the human's own autonomy with repeated requests to approve its decisions. In these circumstances, humans enter into supervisor roles, which tend to increase their workload and, therefore, decrease their awareness in a multitude of ways. In this position statement, we call for the development of human-centered AI in immersive environments to sustain and promote awareness. It is our position then that we believe with the inherent risk presented in both AI and AR/VR systems, we need to examine the interaction between them when we integrate the two to create a new system for any unforeseen risks, and that it is crucial to do so because of its practical application in many high-risk environments.

Read more

5/10/2024

🤖

AI Procurement Checklists: Revisiting Implementation in the Age of AI Governance

Tom Zick, Mason Kortz, David Eaves, Finale Doshi-Velez

YC

0

Reddit

0

Public sector use of AI has been quietly on the rise for the past decade, but only recently have efforts to regulate it entered the cultural zeitgeist. While simple to articulate, promoting ethical and effective roll outs of AI systems in government is a notoriously elusive task. On the one hand there are hard-to-address pitfalls associated with AI-based tools, including concerns about bias towards marginalized communities, safety, and gameability. On the other, there is pressure not to make it too difficult to adopt AI, especially in the public sector which typically has fewer resources than the private sector$unicode{x2014}$conserving scarce government resources is often the draw of using AI-based tools in the first place. These tensions create a real risk that procedures built to ensure marginalized groups are not hurt by government use of AI will, in practice, be performative and ineffective. To inform the latest wave of regulatory efforts in the United States, we look to jurisdictions with mature regulations around government AI use. We report on lessons learned by officials in Brazil, Singapore and Canada, who have collectively implemented risk categories, disclosure requirements and assessments into the way they procure AI tools. In particular, we investigate two implemented checklists: the Canadian Directive on Automated Decision-Making (CDADM) and the World Economic Forum's AI Procurement in a Box (WEF). We detail three key pitfalls around expertise, risk frameworks and transparency, that can decrease the efficacy of regulations aimed at government AI use and suggest avenues for improvement.

Read more

4/24/2024

A Practical Multilevel Governance Framework for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

A Practical Multilevel Governance Framework for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

Lukas D. Pohler, Klaus Diepold, Wendell Wallach

YC

0

Reddit

0

Autonomous and intelligent systems (AIS) facilitate a wide range of beneficial applications across a variety of different domains. However, technical characteristics such as unpredictability and lack of transparency, as well as potential unintended consequences, pose considerable challenges to the current governance infrastructure. Furthermore, the speed of development and deployment of applications outpaces the ability of existing governance institutions to put in place effective ethical-legal oversight. New approaches for agile, distributed and multilevel governance are needed. This work presents a practical framework for multilevel governance of AIS. The framework enables mapping actors onto six levels of decision-making including the international, national and organizational levels. Furthermore, it offers the ability to identify and evolve existing tools or create new tools for guiding the behavior of actors within the levels. Governance mechanisms enable actors to shape and enforce regulations and other tools, which when complemented with good practices contribute to effective and comprehensive governance.

Read more

4/23/2024

Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation

Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation

Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady

YC

0

Reddit

0

As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.

Read more

4/19/2024