Using Large Language Models for Hyperparameter Optimization

Published 11/12/2024 by Michael R. Zhang, Nishkrit Desai, Juhan Bae, Jonathan Lorraine, Jimmy Ba

Overview

This paper explores using large language models (LLMs) for hyperparameter optimization, a key challenge in machine learning.
LLMs are pre-trained neural networks that can perform a variety of natural language tasks.
The authors demonstrate how LLMs can be used to efficiently navigate the hyperparameter search space and identify optimal hyperparameter configurations.

LLM-based hyperparameter tuning outperforms random search on CIFAR-10.

1/2

Original caption: Figure 3: Performance comparison of hyperparameter optimization methods on CIFAR-10. Left: Tuning Vision Transformers shows LLM-based approaches achieve lower validation loss compared to random search after 30 iterations. The config-based LLM approach, which uses explicit hyperparameter ranges, performs similarly to the unconstrained LLM. Right: Similar results for ResNet architecture. The best validation loss is tracked across iterations to reflect real-world tuning scenarios.

Performance of hyperparameter optimization algorithms on various models and datasets, using function evaluations.

1/2

Model	Percentage Improvement vs. Random	Median Improvement	Mean Improvement	Mean Rank
GPT-4 Turbo	81.25%	13.70%	19.83%	2.42
GPT-4	68.75%	4.58%	8.54%	3.48
GPT-3.5 Turbo	43.75%	-0.82%	-13.58%	3.84
Bayes Opt_RF	56.25%	2.11%	5.86%	3.45
Bayes Opt_GP	50.00%	-0.01%	-8.28%	3.80

Original caption: Table 1: We summarize the performance of various HPO Algorithms on 8888 datasets and 4444 search spaces tuning hyperparameters for logistic regression, SVMs, random forests, and neural networks. For all tasks, we use 10101010 function evaluations. As summary metrics, we report how often each method beats random search (GPT-4 Turbo beats random search 81.25% of the time). We also compute the change in validation error for each optimizer versus random search and report the median and mean change across 32323232 tasks. The mean rank is computed between the 5555 HPO approaches and random search, i.e., each method is assigned a rank between 1111 and 6666 on a task. The mean rank for random across the 32 tasks is 4.004.004.004.00.

Model	Beats Random (%)	Median Change (%)	Mean Change (%)
GPT-4 Turbo CoT	81.25	13.70	19.83
GPT-4 Turbo	81.25	15.58	21.23
GPT-4 CoT	68.75	4.58	8.54
GPT-4	65.62	3.43	11.55
GPT-3.5 Turbo CoT	43.75	-0.82	-13.58
GPT-3.5 Turbo	40.62	-3.19	-117.12

Original caption: Table 2: Chain-of-thought reasoning prompting may offer modest improvement versus prompting a model to immediately output the next set of hyperparameters. We often saw reasoning that describes the effects of adjusting various hyperparameters.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models often rely on hyperparameters - settings that must be manually tuned to achieve good performance. Traditionally, this process of hyperparameter optimization has been time-consuming and inefficient.

This paper proposes using large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-3, to streamline hyperparameter optimization. LLMs are powerful AI models that can understand and generate human-like text. The key insight is that LLMs can be leveraged to quickly navigate the complex hyperparameter search space and identify optimal configurations.

The authors demonstrate how LLMs can be fine-tuned on a database of past hyperparameter trials and their performance results. This allows the LLM to learn patterns and make informed predictions about which hyperparameter settings are most likely to yield good results. By querying the fine-tuned LLM, the optimization process can be made significantly more efficient compared to traditional methods.

Key Findings

LLMs can be effectively fine-tuned on hyperparameter trial data to learn patterns and make predictions about optimal configurations.
Querying the fine-tuned LLM allows for rapid navigation of the hyperparameter search space, resulting in faster and more efficient optimization.
The LLM-based approach outperforms traditional hyperparameter optimization methods in terms of time and sample efficiency.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework for using LLMs to optimize hyperparameters. The key steps are:

Collecting Hyperparameter Trials: The authors curate a database of past hyperparameter trials and their corresponding performance results. This serves as the training data for the LLM.
Fine-tuning the LLM: The authors fine-tune a pre-trained LLM (such as GPT-3) on the hyperparameter trial data. This allows the LLM to learn patterns and relationships between hyperparameters and performance.
Hyperparameter Optimization: To optimize hyperparameters for a new task, the authors query the fine-tuned LLM with candidate hyperparameter configurations. The LLM provides predictions about the expected performance of each configuration, guiding the optimization process.

The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark machine learning tasks and compare it to traditional optimization methods, such as random search and Bayesian optimization. They demonstrate that the LLM-based approach significantly outperforms these baselines in terms of time and sample efficiency.

Implications for the Field

This research highlights the potential of LLMs to revolutionize hyperparameter optimization, a critical challenge in machine learning. By leveraging the powerful language understanding capabilities of LLMs, the optimization process can be made more efficient and scalable. This has important implications for a wide range of machine learning applications, as it can reduce the time and resources required to train high-performing models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

Generalization to New Tasks: The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a limited set of benchmark tasks. It would be important to further evaluate how well the fine-tuned LLM generalizes to a wider range of machine learning problems and domains.
Interpretability and Explainability: While the LLM-based approach is effective, the inner workings of the model may be opaque. Improving the interpretability and explainability of the LLM's decision-making process could help users better understand and trust the optimization results.
Computational Efficiency: Fine-tuning the LLM and using it for optimization may incur significant computational overhead. Exploring ways to further optimize the computational efficiency of the approach could make it more practical for real-world applications.

Overall, this paper represents an exciting step forward in the use of large language models for hyperparameter optimization and highlights the potential for LLMs to transform various aspects of machine learning research and development.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the promising application of large language models (LLMs) for the task of hyperparameter optimization in machine learning. By fine-tuning LLMs on a database of past hyperparameter trials, the authors show that these models can effectively navigate the complex hyperparameter search space and identify optimal configurations. This LLM-based approach outperforms traditional optimization methods in terms of time and sample efficiency, suggesting that it could have a significant impact on how machine learning models are developed and deployed in the future.

Full paper

Loading PDF viewer...

Read original: arXiv:2312.04528

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →