A Unified Framework and Dataset for Assessing Societal Bias in Vision-Language Models

Overview

• Proposes a unified framework and dataset for assessing gender bias in vision-language models
• Introduces a new dataset called Social Counterfactuals that includes visual scenes with diverse gender and racial representations
• Evaluates several state-of-the-art vision-language models on the dataset to uncover biases

Plain English Explanation

This research paper presents a new way to measure gender bias in AI systems that combine vision and language, such as image captioning or visual question answering models. The researchers created a dataset called Social Counterfactuals that contains images depicting diverse people in various scenarios.

By evaluating how well-known vision-language models perform on this dataset, the researchers were able to identify biases in how the models perceive and describe people of different genders. For example, the models might be more likely to associate women with domestic tasks and men with leadership roles.

The paper provides a framework for probing and understanding these biases, which is an important step towards building more equitable and inclusive AI systems. The Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models and Think Before You Act papers also address the important issue of bias in vision-language models.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduce a new dataset called Social Counterfactuals that contains over 100,000 images depicting diverse people in a variety of scenarios. This dataset was designed to probe for intersectional biases related to gender, race, and social roles.

They then evaluate several state-of-the-art vision-language models, including CLIP, VinVL, and VisualBERT, on this dataset. The models are tasked with generating captions that describe the visual scenes. By analyzing the generated captions, the researchers are able to identify biases in how the models perceive and describe people of different genders.

The Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models and No Filter papers also explore techniques for uncovering and mitigating biases in vision-language models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their dataset and evaluation framework have some limitations. For example, the dataset primarily focuses on gender and racial biases, but does not address other forms of social bias, such as those related to age, class, or disability.

Additionally, the researchers note that the vision-language models they evaluated were not specifically trained to avoid gender biases. Future work could explore techniques for probing and mitigating intersectional biases during the training process.

Overall, this research represents an important step towards understanding and addressing gender biases in vision-language models, which is crucial for developing more equitable and inclusive AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a unified framework and dataset for assessing gender bias in vision-language models. By evaluating state-of-the-art models on the Social Counterfactuals dataset, the researchers were able to uncover biases in how these models perceive and describe people of different genders.

The findings from this research can inform the development of more equitable and inclusive AI systems, which is an important goal for the field. Continued work in this area, such as probing and mitigating intersectional biases, will be crucial for ensuring that AI technologies benefit all members of society.