Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals
Overview
- Investigates biases in large-scale vision-language models using counterfactual probes
- Probes for biases along multiple demographic dimensions including gender, race, and age
- Finds significant biases in state-of-the-art models and proposes techniques to mitigate them
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how large artificial intelligence (AI) models that can process both images and text exhibit biases. These models, known as vision-language models, have become increasingly powerful and widely used. However, they may reflect biases present in the data they were trained on, which can lead to unfair or inaccurate outputs.
The researchers developed a technique called counterfactual probing to uncover biases in these models along dimensions like gender, race, and age. This involves creating "counterfactual" versions of images or text prompts that differ only in the specific demographic attribute being tested.
By comparing the model's responses to the original and counterfactual versions, the researchers were able to identify significant biases in even the most advanced vision-language models. For example, the models may associate certain occupations or physical attributes more strongly with particular genders or races.
Understanding these biases is an important step towards building more fair and equitable AI systems that do not perpetuate harmful stereotypes or make unfair decisions. The paper proposes techniques to help mitigate these biases, which could lead to tangible improvements in the real-world applications of these powerful models.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for uncovering biases in large-scale vision-language models using counterfactual probing. The key components are:
-
Counterfactual Probing: The researchers create "counterfactual" versions of images or text prompts that differ only in a specific demographic attribute (e.g. gender, race, age). By comparing the model's outputs for the original and counterfactual versions, they can quantify biases along those dimensions.
-
Bias Metrics: The paper defines several metrics to measure different aspects of bias, such as the model's tendency to associate certain attributes with particular demographics (e.g. "doctor" with "male"), and the model's overall calibration across different demographic groups.
-
Bias Mitigation: The researchers explore techniques to mitigate biases, including fine-tuning the model on debiased datasets and introducing explicit debiasing objectives during training.
The authors apply this framework to several state-of-the-art vision-language models, including CLIP and VL-T5. They find significant biases across a range of demographic dimensions, and show that their proposed mitigation techniques can lead to meaningful reductions in these biases.
The results highlight the importance of carefully evaluating the fairness and equity of large AI models, which can have significant real-world impacts when deployed at scale. The paper provides a valuable toolkit for researchers and practitioners to assess and address biases in these powerful systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the importance of uncovering and mitigating biases in large-scale vision-language models. The counterfactual probing approach is a well-designed and rigorous methodology that can provide insights into the nature and extent of these biases.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations of the work. The bias metrics used may not capture all relevant aspects of fairness, and the mitigation techniques are not a panacea - there may be inherent trade-offs between reducing biases and maintaining model performance.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a limited set of demographic attributes (gender, race, age), and there may be other forms of bias, such as those related to socioeconomic status or disability, that are not addressed.
Further research is needed to explore these issues in greater depth, as well as to understand the broader societal implications of biases in these powerful AI systems. Continued collaboration between AI researchers, ethicists, and affected communities will be crucial to ensuring that these technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive framework for uncovering and mitigating biases in large-scale vision-language models. By using counterfactual probing, the researchers were able to identify significant biases along multiple demographic dimensions in state-of-the-art models.
The insights and techniques developed in this work have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems. As they become increasingly ubiquitous in real-world applications, it is crucial that we address the biases and inequities they may perpetuate.
The paper serves as a valuable resource for AI researchers and practitioners, providing a roadmap for assessing and improving the fairness of these models. Continued efforts in this direction will be essential for realizing the full potential of vision-language AI while ensuring it benefits all members of society equitably.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
0
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals
Phillip Howard, Kathleen C. Fraser, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Svetlana Kiritchenko
With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) possessing increasingly impressive capabilities, a number of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs. Such models condition generated text on both an input image and a text prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat. While prior studies have examined the social biases contained in text generated by LLMs, this topic has been relatively unexplored in LVLMs. Examining social biases in LVLMs is particularly challenging due to the confounding contributions of bias induced by information contained across the text and visual modalities. To address this challenging problem, we conduct a large-scale study of text generated by different LVLMs under counterfactual changes to input images. Specifically, we present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets, where each set contains images which are largely identical in their depiction of a common subject (e.g., a doctor), but vary only in terms of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race and gender). We comprehensively evaluate the text produced by different models under this counterfactual generation setting at scale, producing over 57 million responses from popular LVLMs. Our multi-dimensional analysis reveals that social attributes such as race, gender, and physical characteristics depicted in input images can significantly influence the generation of toxic content, competency-associated words, harmful stereotypes, and numerical ratings of depicted individuals. We additionally explore the relationship between social bias in LVLMs and their corresponding LLMs, as well as inference-time strategies to mitigate bias.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models with Counterfactuals
Phillip Howard, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Kathleen C. Fraser, Svetlana Kiritchenko
With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) possessing increasingly impressive capabilities, a number of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs. Such models condition generated text on both an input image and a text prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat. While prior studies have examined the social biases contained in text generated by LLMs, this topic has been relatively unexplored in LVLMs. Examining social biases in LVLMs is particularly challenging due to the confounding contributions of bias induced by information contained across the text and visual modalities. To address this challenging problem, we conduct a large-scale study of text generated by different LVLMs under counterfactual changes to input images. Specifically, we present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets, where each set contains images which are largely identical in their depiction of a common subject (e.g., a doctor), but vary only in terms of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race and gender). We comprehensively evaluate the text produced by different LVLMs under this counterfactual generation setting and find that social attributes such as race, gender, and physical characteristics depicted in input images can significantly influence toxicity and the generation of competency-associated words.
Read more6/11/2024
🧠
0
SocialCounterfactuals: Probing and Mitigating Intersectional Social Biases in Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples
Phillip Howard, Avinash Madasu, Tiep Le, Gustavo Lujan Moreno, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Vasudev Lal
While vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance improvements recently, there is growing evidence that these models also posses harmful biases with respect to social attributes such as gender and race. Prior studies have primarily focused on probing such bias attributes individually while ignoring biases associated with intersections between social attributes. This could be due to the difficulty of collecting an exhaustive set of image-text pairs for various combinations of social attributes. To address this challenge, we employ text-to-image diffusion models to produce counterfactual examples for probing intersectional social biases at scale. Our approach utilizes Stable Diffusion with cross attention control to produce sets of counterfactual image-text pairs that are highly similar in their depiction of a subject (e.g., a given occupation) while differing only in their depiction of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race & gender). Through our over-generate-then-filter methodology, we produce SocialCounterfactuals, a high-quality dataset containing 171k image-text pairs for probing intersectional biases related to gender, race, and physical characteristics. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the usefulness of our generated dataset for probing and mitigating intersectional social biases in state-of-the-art VLMs.
Read more4/11/2024
0
GenderBias-emph{VL}: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing
Yisong Xiao, Aishan Liu, QianJia Cheng, Zhenfei Yin, Siyuan Liang, Jiapeng Li, Jing Shao, Xianglong Liu, Dacheng Tao
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been widely adopted in various applications; however, they exhibit significant gender biases. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate gender bias at the demographic group level, neglecting individual fairness, which emphasizes equal treatment of similar individuals. This research gap limits the detection of discriminatory behaviors, as individual fairness offers a more granular examination of biases that group fairness may overlook. For the first time, this paper introduces the GenderBias-emph{VL} benchmark to evaluate occupation-related gender bias in LVLMs using counterfactual visual questions under individual fairness criteria. To construct this benchmark, we first utilize text-to-image diffusion models to generate occupation images and their gender counterfactuals. Subsequently, we generate corresponding textual occupation options by identifying stereotyped occupation pairs with high semantic similarity but opposite gender proportions in real-world statistics. This method enables the creation of large-scale visual question counterfactuals to expose biases in LVLMs, applicable in both multimodal and unimodal contexts through modifying gender attributes in specific modalities. Overall, our GenderBias-emph{VL} benchmark comprises 34,581 visual question counterfactual pairs, covering 177 occupations. Using our benchmark, we extensively evaluate 15 commonly used open-source LVLMs (eg, LLaVA) and state-of-the-art commercial APIs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-Pro. Our findings reveal widespread gender biases in existing LVLMs. Our benchmark offers: (1) a comprehensive dataset for occupation-related gender bias evaluation; (2) an up-to-date leaderboard on LVLM biases; and (3) a nuanced understanding of the biases presented by these models. footnote{The dataset and code are available at the href{https://genderbiasvl.github.io/}{website}.}
Read more7/2/2024