Training Language Models to Generate Text with Citations via Fine-grained Rewards
119
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for training language models to generate text with accurate citations to external sources.
- The approach uses fine-grained rewards based on evaluating the correctness and relevance of citations during the text generation process.
- The authors demonstrate improvements in citation quality and faithfulness to source material compared to baseline language models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a way to train language models, like the ones used in AI assistants, to generate text that includes proper citations to external sources. This work builds on previous research on improving language model performance and grounding through citation generation.
The key idea is to provide the model with detailed feedback, or "rewards," during training based on how well the citations it generates match the source material. This "fine-grained" reward signal helps the model learn to produce text that cites relevant sources accurately, rather than just generating citations randomly or inaccurately.
By training the model this way, the authors show it is able to produce text with better quality and more faithful citations compared to standard language models. This could be useful for applications like academic writing assistance, fact-checking, or generating summaries that properly attribute information to sources.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a method for fine-tuning large language models to generate text with accurate citations. The approach involves defining a set of fine-grained rewards that evaluate the correctness and relevance of citations produced by the model during text generation.
The rewards cover aspects like:
- Whether the cited source is relevant to the generated text
- If the citation accurately reflects the content of the source
- If the citation is placed in the appropriate location within the generated text
These rewards are used to guide the model's training, providing more granular feedback than just evaluating the overall quality of the generated text.
The authors experiment with this approach using the GPT-3 language model as a starting point, and demonstrate improvements in citation quality and faithfulness compared to baseline models. This builds on prior work on enhancing language models through citation-based training and grounding.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach for improving the citation abilities of large language models. The fine-grained rewards seem well-designed to push the model towards generating more accurate and relevant citations.
However, the authors acknowledge some limitations. The training process is computationally intensive, requiring multiple rounds of fine-tuning. There are also open questions around how to scale this approach to broader domains beyond the specific dataset used in the experiments.
Additional research would be needed to explore the generalization of this method, its robustness to adversarial attacks, and its performance in real-world applications like academic writing assistance. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step towards building language models that can reliably cite sources and ground their generated text in external evidence.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for training language models to generate text with accurate and relevant citations. By defining fine-grained rewards that assess the quality of citations during the text generation process, the authors demonstrate improvements in citation faithfulness compared to standard language models.
This work has the potential to enable more reliable and trustworthy text generation in applications like academic writing, journalism, and knowledge summarization. Further research is needed to explore the scalability and real-world performance of this method, but it represents an important advance in the field of citation-aware language modeling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
119
Training Language Models to Generate Text with Citations via Fine-grained Rewards
Chengyu Huang, Zeqiu Wu, Yushi Hu, Wenya Wang
While recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven useful in answering user queries, they are prone to hallucination, and their responses often lack credibility due to missing references to reliable sources. An intuitive solution to these issues would be to include in-text citations referring to external documents as evidence. While previous works have directly prompted LLMs to generate in-text citations, their performances are far from satisfactory, especially when it comes to smaller LLMs. In this work, we propose an effective training framework using fine-grained rewards to teach LLMs to generate highly supportive and relevant citations, while ensuring the correctness of their responses. We also conduct a systematic analysis of applying these fine-grained rewards to common LLM training strategies, demonstrating its advantage over conventional practices. We conduct extensive experiments on Question Answering (QA) datasets taken from the ALCE benchmark and validate the model's generalizability using EXPERTQA. On LLaMA-2-7B, the incorporation of fine-grained rewards achieves the best performance among the baselines, even surpassing that of GPT-3.5-turbo.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Learning to Generate Answers with Citations via Factual Consistency Models
Rami Aly, Zhiqiang Tang, Samson Tan, George Karypis
Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate, impeding their reliability in mission-critical situations. One approach to address this issue is to provide citations to relevant sources alongside generated content, enhancing the verifiability of generations. However, citing passages accurately in answers remains a substantial challenge. This paper proposes a weakly-supervised fine-tuning method leveraging factual consistency models (FCMs). Our approach alternates between generating texts with citations and supervised fine-tuning with FCM-filtered citation data. Focused learning is integrated into the objective, directing the fine-tuning process to emphasise the factual unit tokens, as measured by an FCM. Results on the ALCE few-shot citation benchmark with various instruction-tuned LLMs demonstrate superior performance compared to in-context learning, vanilla supervised fine-tuning, and state-of-the-art methods, with an average improvement of $34.1$, $15.5$, and $10.5$ citation F$_1$ points, respectively. Moreover, in a domain transfer setting we show that the obtained citation generation ability robustly transfers to unseen datasets. Notably, our citation improvements contribute to the lowest factual error rate across baselines.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Context-Enhanced Language Models for Generating Multi-Paper Citations
Avinash Anand, Kritarth Prasad, Ujjwal Goel, Mohit Gupta, Naman Lal, Astha Verma, Rajiv Ratn Shah
Citation text plays a pivotal role in elucidating the connection between scientific documents, demanding an in-depth comprehension of the cited paper. Constructing citations is often time-consuming, requiring researchers to delve into extensive literature and grapple with articulating relevant content. To address this challenge, the field of citation text generation (CTG) has emerged. However, while earlier methods have primarily centered on creating single-sentence citations, practical scenarios frequently necessitate citing multiple papers within a single paragraph. To bridge this gap, we propose a method that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate multi-citation sentences. Our approach involves a single source paper and a collection of target papers, culminating in a coherent paragraph containing multi-sentence citation text. Furthermore, we introduce a curated dataset named MCG-S2ORC, composed of English-language academic research papers in Computer Science, showcasing multiple citation instances. In our experiments, we evaluate three LLMs LLaMA, Alpaca, and Vicuna to ascertain the most effective model for this endeavor. Additionally, we exhibit enhanced performance by integrating knowledge graphs from target papers into the prompts for generating citation text. This research underscores the potential of harnessing LLMs for citation generation, opening a compelling avenue for exploring the intricate connections between scientific documents.
Read more4/23/2024
0
LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-context QA
Jiajie Zhang, Yushi Bai, Xin Lv, Wanjun Gu, Danqing Liu, Minhao Zou, Shulin Cao, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Ling Feng, Juanzi Li
Though current long-context large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capacities in answering user questions based on extensive text, the lack of citations in their responses makes user verification difficult, leading to concerns about their trustworthiness due to their potential hallucinations. In this work, we aim to enable long-context LLMs to generate responses with fine-grained sentence-level citations, improving their faithfulness and verifiability. We first introduce LongBench-Cite, an automated benchmark for assessing current LLMs' performance in Long-Context Question Answering with Citations (LQAC), revealing considerable room for improvement. To this end, we propose CoF (Coarse to Fine), a novel pipeline that utilizes off-the-shelf LLMs to automatically generate long-context QA instances with precise sentence-level citations, and leverage this pipeline to construct LongCite-45k, a large-scale SFT dataset for LQAC. Finally, we train LongCite-8B and LongCite-9B using the LongCite-45k dataset, successfully enabling their generation of accurate responses and fine-grained sentence-level citations in a single output. The evaluation results on LongBench-Cite show that our trained models achieve state-of-the-art citation quality, surpassing advanced proprietary models including GPT-4o.
Read more9/11/2024