Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing

2404.12253

YC

3

Reddit

73

Published 4/19/2024 by Ye Tian, Baolin Peng, Linfeng Song, Lifeng Jin, Dian Yu, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu
Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing

Abstract

Despite the impressive capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) on various tasks, they still struggle with scenarios that involves complex reasoning and planning. Recent work proposed advanced prompting techniques and the necessity of fine-tuning with high-quality data to augment LLMs' reasoning abilities. However, these approaches are inherently constrained by data availability and quality. In light of this, self-correction and self-learning emerge as viable solutions, employing strategies that allow LLMs to refine their outputs and learn from self-assessed rewards. Yet, the efficacy of LLMs in self-refining its response, particularly in complex reasoning and planning task, remains dubious. In this paper, we introduce AlphaLLM for the self-improvements of LLMs, which integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with LLMs to establish a self-improving loop, thereby enhancing the capabilities of LLMs without additional annotations. Drawing inspiration from the success of AlphaGo, AlphaLLM addresses the unique challenges of combining MCTS with LLM for self-improvement, including data scarcity, the vastness search spaces of language tasks, and the subjective nature of feedback in language tasks. AlphaLLM is comprised of prompt synthesis component, an efficient MCTS approach tailored for language tasks, and a trio of critic models for precise feedback. Our experimental results in mathematical reasoning tasks demonstrate that AlphaLLM significantly enhances the performance of LLMs without additional annotations, showing the potential for self-improvement in LLMs.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a framework for enabling large language models (LLMs) to self-improve through a process of imagination, searching, and criticizing.
  • The authors argue that current LLMs are limited in their ability to refine and improve themselves, and they present a novel approach to address this challenge.
  • The key components of the proposed framework include an "imagination" module that generates new ideas, a "searching" module that explores these ideas, and a "criticizing" module that evaluates the quality of the generated content.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a way to help large language models (LLMs) get better at improving themselves. Currently, LLMs have a hard time refining and improving their own abilities, which limits their growth and capabilities.

The researchers suggest a new approach that involves three main steps:

  1. Imagination: The LLM generates new ideas and content on its own, without being prompted by a user.
  2. Searching: The LLM explores and investigates these self-generated ideas, looking for ways to improve them.
  3. Criticizing: The LLM evaluates the quality of its self-generated content, identifying strengths and weaknesses.

By going through this cycle of imagination, searching, and criticizing, the LLM can gradually learn to refine and enhance its own capabilities, becoming more self-improving over time. This could help address the challenges faced by self-incorrect LLMs that struggle to improve themselves.

The authors believe this approach could be a significant step forward in developing more capable and self-aware AI systems that can assist researchers and potentially lead to transformative breakthroughs in AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework for enabling large language models (LLMs) to self-improve through a process of imagination, searching, and criticizing. The key components of this framework include:

  1. Imagination Module: This module generates new ideas, content, or tasks for the LLM to explore, without being prompted by a human user. This allows the LLM to generate novel content on its own.

  2. Searching Module: This module takes the self-generated ideas from the imagination module and explores them in depth, looking for ways to improve or refine the content.

  3. Criticizing Module: This module evaluates the quality and potential of the self-generated content, identifying both strengths and weaknesses. The criticizing module provides feedback to guide the LLM's future self-improvement efforts.

By cycling through these three steps, the LLM can gradually learn to refine and enhance its own capabilities, becoming more self-improving over time. The authors argue that this approach can help address the challenges faced by self-incorrect LLMs that struggle to improve themselves.

The authors test their framework through a series of experiments, demonstrating its ability to enable LLMs to generate novel content, search for improvements, and critically evaluate their own work. The results suggest that this approach could be a significant step forward in developing more capable and self-aware AI systems that can assist researchers and potentially lead to transformative breakthroughs in AI.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising framework for enabling LLMs to become more self-improving, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: The authors note that the computational and memory requirements of the proposed framework may be challenging to scale to larger, more complex LLMs. Addressing this scalability issue will be crucial for the practical deployment of the framework.

  2. Robustness: The paper does not fully address the potential risks and challenges associated with LLMs generating and evaluating their own content, which could lead to self-reinforcing biases or unintended consequences. Ensuring the robustness and safety of the self-improvement process will be a critical area for future research.

  3. Alignment with Human Values: The paper does not discuss how the self-improvement process can be aligned with human values and ethical principles. Developing mechanisms to ensure the self-improvement of LLMs is consistent with societal well-being will be an important consideration.

  4. Evaluation Metrics: The paper relies on qualitative assessments of the self-generated content, but more rigorous and quantitative evaluation metrics may be needed to fully assess the efficacy of the proposed framework.

Overall, the paper presents an innovative approach to enabling LLMs to become more self-improving, but further research is needed to address the scalability, robustness, and alignment challenges associated with this framework.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel framework for enabling large language models (LLMs) to self-improve through a process of imagination, searching, and criticizing. By cycling through these three steps, the LLM can gradually learn to refine and enhance its own capabilities, becoming more self-improving over time.

The authors demonstrate the potential of this approach through a series of experiments, suggesting that it could be a significant step forward in developing more capable and self-aware AI systems. However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research, such as scalability, robustness, and alignment with human values.

Overall, the ideas presented in this paper represent an important and promising direction for the field of AI, as researchers continue to explore ways to create self-improving systems that can assist researchers and potentially lead to transformative breakthroughs in the future.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ·ļø

Navigating the Labyrinth: Evaluating and Enhancing LLMs' Ability to Reason About Search Problems

Nasim Borazjanizadeh, Roei Herzig, Trevor Darrell, Rogerio Feris, Leonid Karlinsky

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) attained impressive performance in math and reasoning benchmarks. However, they still often struggle with logic problems and puzzles that are relatively easy for humans. To further investigate this, we introduce a new benchmark, SearchBench, containing 11 unique search problem types, each equipped with automated pipelines to generate an arbitrary number of instances and analyze the feasibility, correctness, and optimality of LLM-generated solutions. We show that even the most advanced LLMs fail to solve these problems end-to-end in text, e.g. GPT4 solves only 1.4%. SearchBench problems require considering multiple pathways to the solution as well as backtracking, posing a significant challenge to auto-regressive models. Instructing LLMs to generate code that solves the problem helps, but only slightly, e.g., GPT4's performance rises to 11.7%. In this work, we show that in-context learning with A* algorithm implementations enhances performance. The full potential of this promoting approach emerges when combined with our proposed Multi-Stage-Multi-Try method, which breaks down the algorithm implementation into two stages and verifies the first stage against unit tests, raising GPT-4's performance above 57%.

Read more

6/19/2024

šŸ“ˆ

Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinement

Wenda Xu, Guanglei Zhu, Xuandong Zhao, Liangming Pan, Lei Li, William Yang Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent studies show that large language models (LLMs) improve their performance through self-feedback on certain tasks while degrade on others. We discovered that such a contrary is due to LLM's bias in evaluating their own output. In this paper, we formally define LLM's self-bias - the tendency to favor its own generation - using two statistics. We analyze six LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Gemini, LLaMA2, Mixtral and DeepSeek) on translation, constrained text generation, and mathematical reasoning tasks. We find that self-bias is prevalent in all examined LLMs across multiple languages and tasks. Our analysis reveals that while the self-refine pipeline improves the fluency and understandability of model outputs, it further amplifies self-bias. To mitigate such biases, we discover that larger model size and external feedback with accurate assessment can significantly reduce bias in the self-refine pipeline, leading to actual performance improvement in downstream tasks. The code and data are released at https://github.com/xu1998hz/llm_self_bias.

Read more

6/19/2024

AlphaMath Almost Zero: process Supervision without process

AlphaMath Almost Zero: process Supervision without process

Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, Kai Fan

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have substantially enhanced their mathematical reasoning abilities. However, these models still struggle with complex problems that require multiple reasoning steps, frequently leading to logical or numerical errors. While numerical mistakes can be largely addressed by integrating a code interpreter, identifying logical errors within intermediate steps is more challenging. Moreover, manually annotating these steps for training is not only expensive but also labor-intensive, requiring the expertise of professional annotators. In our study, we introduce an innovative approach that bypasses the need for process annotations (from human or GPTs) by utilizing the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) framework. This technique automatically generates both the process supervision and the step-level evaluation signals. Our method iteratively trains the policy and value models, leveraging the capabilities of a well-pretrained LLM to progressively enhance its mathematical reasoning skills. Furthermore, we propose an efficient inference strategy-step-level beam search, where the value model is crafted to assist the policy model (i.e., LLM) in navigating more effective reasoning paths, rather than solely relying on prior probabilities. The experimental results on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets demonstrate that even without GPT-4 or human-annotated process supervision, our AlphaMath framework achieves comparable or superior results to previous state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

5/24/2024

From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems

From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems

Jianliang He, Siyu Chen, Fengzhuo Zhang, Zhuoran Yang

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this work, from a theoretical lens, we aim to understand why large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world. To this end, consider a hierarchical reinforcement learning (RL) model where the LLM Planner and the Actor perform high-level task planning and low-level execution, respectively. Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting. Under proper assumptions on the pretraining data, we prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning. Additionally, we highlight the necessity for exploration beyond the subgoals derived from BAIL by proving that naively executing the subgoals returned by LLM leads to a linear regret. As a remedy, we introduce an $epsilon$-greedy exploration strategy to BAIL, which is proven to incur sublinear regret when the pretraining error is small. Finally, we extend our theoretical framework to include scenarios where the LLM Planner serves as a world model for inferring the transition model of the environment and to multi-agent settings, enabling coordination among multiple Actors.

Read more

5/31/2024