# The Topos of Transformer Networks

2403.18415

3

1

🧠

## Abstract

The transformer neural network has significantly out-shined all other neural network architectures as the engine behind large language models. We provide a theoretical analysis of the expressivity of the transformer architecture through the lens of topos theory. From this viewpoint, we show that many common neural network architectures, such as the convolutional, recurrent and graph convolutional networks, can be embedded in a pretopos of piecewise-linear functions, but that the transformer necessarily lives in its topos completion. In particular, this suggests that the two network families instantiate different fragments of logic: the former are first order, whereas transformers are higher-order reasoners. Furthermore, we draw parallels with architecture search and gradient descent, integrating our analysis in the framework of cybernetic agents.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

## Overview

- This paper explores the mathematical and conceptual foundations of transformer neural networks, a widely-used type of deep learning model.
- The authors approach transformers from the perspective of category theory, a branch of mathematics that studies the properties of abstract structures and their relationships.
- By casting transformers in the language of category theory, the paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of their underlying principles and how they relate to other neural network architectures.

## Plain English Explanation

Transformer neural networks have become incredibly popular in recent years, powering breakthroughs in areas like natural language processing, image recognition, and even protein structure prediction. But what exactly are transformers, and how do they work under the hood?

This paper tackles that question by taking a fresh, mathematical perspective on transformers. The researchers use the language of category theory, a branch of abstract algebra, to model transformers as a special kind of "object" with particular properties and relationships to other neural network architectures.

By framing transformers in this formal, categorical way, the authors aim to shed new light on the core principles and design choices that make these models so powerful and versatile. It's like taking a step back to understand the fundamental "shape" or "topology" of transformers, rather than just focusing on their inputs and outputs.

The goal is to provide a richer, more rigorous understanding of transformers that can help researchers design better models, interpret their behavior, and even explore new hybrid architectures that combine transformers with other neural network types. It's a deep dive into the mathematical foundations of a transformative machine learning tool.

## Technical Explanation

The paper formalizes transformers in the language of category theory, casting them as a particular type of "functor" - a mathematical structure that maps between different categorical "objects" and "morphisms."

Specifically, the authors define a "category of neural networks" where the objects are individual neural network layers or modules, and the morphisms represent the composition of these building blocks into larger architectures. They then show how transformers can be understood as a special kind of "topos," a categorical construct that captures the unique properties of these models.

This categorical framing allows the researchers to analyze transformers through the lens of abstract algebra, revealing insights about their representational power, compositionality, and relationship to other network types like convolutional and recurrent models. For example, they demonstrate that transformers exhibit a "self-referential" structure, where the intermediate representations are used to compute the final outputs.

By grounding transformers in category theory, the paper provides a rigorous, mathematically-principled foundation for understanding these ubiquitous deep learning models. This foundational work could pave the way for more sophisticated transformer architectures, improved interpretability, and deeper connections to other areas of machine learning and mathematics.

## Critical Analysis

The authors make a compelling case for the value of a categorical perspective on transformers, but there are some important caveats to consider. While the mathematical framework offers deep insights, it remains quite abstract and may be challenging for some readers to fully grasp. The paper also focuses primarily on the theoretical properties of transformers, leaving open questions about how these insights translate to practical model design and performance.

Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their categorical treatment does not capture all the nuances of real-world transformer implementations, which often include various architectural tweaks and training techniques not covered in the formal analysis. Further work is needed to bridge the gap between the theoretical and empirical aspects of these models.

That said, this paper represents an important step towards a more rigorous, foundational understanding of transformers. By casting them in the language of category theory, the researchers have opened up new avenues for exploring their expressive power, interpretability, and relationships to other neural network architectures. This work lays the groundwork for future research that could yield transformative insights into the nature of intelligent computation.

## Conclusion

This paper offers a novel, mathematical perspective on transformer neural networks, framing them as a particular type of categorical structure known as a "topos." By casting transformers in the language of abstract algebra, the authors provide a rigorous, foundational understanding of these powerful models and their unique properties.

The categorical approach reveals deep insights about the self-referential nature of transformers, their representational capacities, and their connections to other neural network architectures. While the theory remains quite abstract, this work represents an important step towards a more principled, mathematically-grounded understanding of transformers and their role in advancing the frontiers of artificial intelligence.

As the field of deep learning continues to evolve, this kind of foundational research will be crucial for unlocking the next generation of intelligent systems, with transformers at the forefront. By exploring the mathematical underpinnings of these models, we can better understand their strengths, limitations, and potential for further innovation.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

## Related Papers

💬

### Attending to Graph Transformers

Luis Muller, Mikhail Galkin, Christopher Morris, Ladislav Ramp'av{s}ek

0

0

Recently, transformer architectures for graphs emerged as an alternative to established techniques for machine learning with graphs, such as (message-passing) graph neural networks. So far, they have shown promising empirical results, e.g., on molecular prediction datasets, often attributed to their ability to circumvent graph neural networks' shortcomings, such as over-smoothing and over-squashing. Here, we derive a taxonomy of graph transformer architectures, bringing some order to this emerging field. We overview their theoretical properties, survey structural and positional encodings, and discuss extensions for important graph classes, e.g., 3D molecular graphs. Empirically, we probe how well graph transformers can recover various graph properties, how well they can deal with heterophilic graphs, and to what extent they prevent over-squashing. Further, we outline open challenges and research direction to stimulate future work. Our code is available at https://github.com/luis-mueller/probing-graph-transformers.

4/1/2024

### Volume-Preserving Transformers for Learning Time Series Data with Structure

Benedikt Brantner, Guillaume de Romemont, Michael Kraus, Zeyuan Li

0

0

Two of the many trends in neural network research of the past few years have been (i) the learning of dynamical systems, especially with recurrent neural networks such as long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) and (ii) the introduction of transformer neural networks for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Both of these trends have created enormous amounts of traction, particularly the second one: transformer networks now dominate the field of NLP. Even though some work has been performed on the intersection of these two trends, those efforts was largely limited to using the vanilla transformer directly without adjusting its architecture for the setting of a physical system. In this work we use a transformer-inspired neural network to learn a dynamical system and furthermore (for the first time) imbue it with structure-preserving properties to improve long-term stability. This is shown to be of great advantage when applying the neural network to real world applications.

5/2/2024

### A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Models

Javier Ferrando, Gabriele Sarti, Arianna Bisazza, Marta R. Costa-juss`a

0

0

The rapid progress of research aimed at interpreting the inner workings of advanced language models has highlighted a need for contextualizing the insights gained from years of work in this area. This primer provides a concise technical introduction to the current techniques used to interpret the inner workings of Transformer-based language models, focusing on the generative decoder-only architecture. We conclude by presenting a comprehensive overview of the known internal mechanisms implemented by these models, uncovering connections across popular approaches and active research directions in this area.

5/3/2024

### A rank decomposition for the topological classification of neural representations

Kosio Beshkov, Gaute T. Einevoll

0

0

Neural networks can be thought of as applying a transformation to an input dataset. The way in which they change the topology of such a dataset often holds practical significance for many tasks, particularly those demanding non-homeomorphic mappings for optimal solutions, such as classification problems. In this work, we leverage the fact that neural networks are equivalent to continuous piecewise-affine maps, whose rank can be used to pinpoint regions in the input space that undergo non-homeomorphic transformations, leading to alterations in the topological structure of the input dataset. Our approach enables us to make use of the relative homology sequence, with which one can study the homology groups of the quotient of a manifold $mathcal{M}$ and a subset $A$, assuming some minimal properties on these spaces. As a proof of principle, we empirically investigate the presence of low-rank (topology-changing) affine maps as a function of network width and mean weight. We show that in randomly initialized narrow networks, there will be regions in which the (co)homology groups of a data manifold can change. As the width increases, the homology groups of the input manifold become more likely to be preserved. We end this part of our work by constructing highly non-random wide networks that do not have this property and relating this non-random regime to Dale's principle, which is a defining characteristic of biological neural networks. Finally, we study simple feedforward networks trained on MNIST, as well as on toy classification and regression tasks, and show that networks manipulate the topology of data differently depending on the continuity of the task they are trained on.

5/14/2024