Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI

2401.02843

YC

85

Reddit

0

Published 5/2/2024 by Katja Grace, Harlan Stewart, Julia Fabienne Sandkuhler, Stephen Thomas, Ben Weinstein-Raun, Jan Brauner
Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI

Abstract

In the largest survey of its kind, 2,778 researchers who had published in top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) venues gave predictions on the pace of AI progress and the nature and impacts of advanced AI systems The aggregate forecasts give at least a 50% chance of AI systems achieving several milestones by 2028, including autonomously constructing a payment processing site from scratch, creating a song indistinguishable from a new song by a popular musician, and autonomously downloading and fine-tuning a large language model. If science continues undisrupted, the chance of unaided machines outperforming humans in every possible task was estimated at 10% by 2027, and 50% by 2047. The latter estimate is 13 years earlier than that reached in a similar survey we conducted only one year earlier [Grace et al., 2022]. However, the chance of all human occupations becoming fully automatable was forecast to reach 10% by 2037, and 50% as late as 2116 (compared to 2164 in the 2022 survey). Most respondents expressed substantial uncertainty about the long-term value of AI progress: While 68.3% thought good outcomes from superhuman AI are more likely than bad, of these net optimists 48% gave at least a 5% chance of extremely bad outcomes such as human extinction, and 59% of net pessimists gave 5% or more to extremely good outcomes. Between 38% and 51% of respondents gave at least a 10% chance to advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. More than half suggested that substantial or extreme concern is warranted about six different AI-related scenarios, including misinformation, authoritarian control, and inequality. There was disagreement about whether faster or slower AI progress would be better for the future of humanity. However, there was broad agreement that research aimed at minimizing potential risks from AI systems ought to be prioritized more.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper presents the results of a large-scale survey of thousands of AI researchers and authors to understand their perspectives on the future progress and impacts of AI.
  • The survey covered a range of topics, including the timeline for achieving various AI capabilities, the major challenges facing the field, and the ethical considerations around advanced AI systems.
  • The findings provide insights into the collective views and forecasts of the AI community on the future trajectory and implications of their work.

Plain English Explanation

This paper reports on the results of a comprehensive survey that collected the views of thousands of AI researchers and authors on the future of AI technology. The researchers asked these experts a variety of questions to understand their perspectives on how quickly different AI capabilities might be achieved, what the biggest challenges are for the field, and the ethical considerations around advanced AI systems.

The survey results offer a window into the collective thinking of the AI community about the likely course of progress in their field and the potential impacts, both positive and negative, that could arise from continued AI advancements. By aggregating the insights and predictions from such a large and knowledgeable group of AI practitioners, the paper provides a valuable snapshot of the current landscape and future outlook for this rapidly evolving technology.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a comprehensive online survey of thousands of AI authors and researchers to gather their perspectives on the future trajectory and societal implications of AI systems. The survey covered a range of topics, including:

  1. The timeline for achieving 39 different AI capabilities, such as human-level language understanding, autonomous vehicles, and medical diagnosis.
  2. The importance and difficulty of tackling 10 key challenges facing the AI field, including safety, scalability, and robustness.
  3. The potential positive and negative impacts of advanced AI systems on areas like the economy, environment, and human wellbeing.
  4. Ethical considerations around the development and deployment of transformative AI technologies.

By collecting responses from such a large and knowledgeable group of AI experts, the researchers were able to analyze the collective views and forecasts of the AI community. The findings provide insights into the anticipated pace of progress in different AI domains, the priority areas for research and development, and the range of concerns that AI practitioners have about the societal implications of their work.

Critical Analysis

The survey methodology and broad sampling of the AI research community lend credibility to the findings presented in this paper. However, there are a few potential limitations to consider:

  • The survey relies on self-reported estimates and opinions, which can be subject to cognitive biases and uncertainties. Actual progress in AI may differ from the expert forecasts.
  • The survey does not capture the full diversity of views within the AI field, as it only reflects the perspectives of those who chose to participate.
  • The paper does not delve deeply into the reasoning and rationales behind the experts' responses, which could provide additional context and nuance.

Despite these caveats, the large scale of the survey and the thoughtful analysis of the results make this an important contribution to understanding the current state of AI development and the evolving views of those shaping the future of this transformative technology. The findings underscore the need for continued research, ethical deliberation, and proactive planning as AI systems become increasingly capable and influential.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey of thousands of AI researchers and authors offers a valuable snapshot of the AI community's collective perspective on the future progress and societal impacts of their work. The findings reveal both optimism and caution about the timeline for achieving various AI capabilities, the technical challenges that must be overcome, and the ethical considerations around advanced AI systems.

By aggregating the insights and forecasts of such a large and knowledgeable group of experts, this paper provides policymakers, businesses, and the general public with a better understanding of the current landscape and future trajectory of AI development. The results can inform strategic planning, research priorities, and public discourse around the responsible advancement of this transformative technology.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🤖

Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress

Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, Pieter Abbeel, Trevor Darrell, Yuval Noah Harari, Ya-Qin Zhang, Lan Xue, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Gillian Hadfield, Jeff Clune, Tegan Maharaj, Frank Hutter, At{i}l{i}m Gunec{s} Baydin, Sheila McIlraith, Qiqi Gao, Ashwin Acharya, David Krueger, Anca Dragan, Philip Torr, Stuart Russell, Daniel Kahneman, Jan Brauner, Soren Mindermann

YC

0

Reddit

0

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressing rapidly, and companies are shifting their focus to developing generalist AI systems that can autonomously act and pursue goals. Increases in capabilities and autonomy may soon massively amplify AI's impact, with risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. Although researchers have warned of extreme risks from AI, there is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Society's response, despite promising first steps, is incommensurate with the possibility of rapid, transformative progress that is expected by many experts. AI safety research is lagging. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems. In this short consensus paper, we describe extreme risks from upcoming, advanced AI systems. Drawing on lessons learned from other safety-critical technologies, we then outline a comprehensive plan combining technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance mechanisms for a more commensurate preparation.

Read more

5/24/2024

🤖

Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice

Eric Horvitz, Vincent Conitzer, Sheila McIlraith, Peter Stone

YC

0

Reddit

0

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) will transform many aspects of our lives and society, bringing immense opportunities but also posing significant risks and challenges. The next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. We write to share a set of recommendations for moving forward from the perspective of the founder and leaders of the One Hundred Year Study on AI. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts to evaluate the immediate, longer-term, and far-reaching effects of AI on people and society, and to make recommendations about AI research, policy, and practice. As we witness new capabilities emerging from neural models, it is crucial that we engage in efforts to advance our scientific understanding of these models and their behaviors. We must address the impact of AI on people and society through technical, social, and sociotechnical lenses, incorporating insights from a diverse range of experts including voices from engineering, social, behavioral, and economic disciplines. By fostering dialogue, collaboration, and action among various stakeholders, we can strategically guide the development and deployment of AI in ways that maximize its potential for contributing to human flourishing. Despite the growing divide in the field between focusing on short-term versus long-term implications, we think both are of critical importance. As Alan Turing, one of the pioneers of AI, wrote in 1950, We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.

Read more

4/23/2024

Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024

Nestor Maslej, Loredana Fattorini, Raymond Perrault, Vanessa Parli, Anka Reuel, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Katrina Ligett, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Juan Carlos Niebles, Yoav Shoham, Russell Wald, Jack Clark

YC

0

Reddit

0

The 2024 Index is our most comprehensive to date and arrives at an important moment when AI's influence on society has never been more pronounced. This year, we have broadened our scope to more extensively cover essential trends such as technical advancements in AI, public perceptions of the technology, and the geopolitical dynamics surrounding its development. Featuring more original data than ever before, this edition introduces new estimates on AI training costs, detailed analyses of the responsible AI landscape, and an entirely new chapter dedicated to AI's impact on science and medicine. The AI Index report tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data related to artificial intelligence (AI). Our mission is to provide unbiased, rigorously vetted, broadly sourced data in order for policymakers, researchers, executives, journalists, and the general public to develop a more thorough and nuanced understanding of the complex field of AI. The AI Index is recognized globally as one of the most credible and authoritative sources for data and insights on artificial intelligence. Previous editions have been cited in major newspapers, including the The New York Times, Bloomberg, and The Guardian, have amassed hundreds of academic citations, and been referenced by high-level policymakers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, among other places. This year's edition surpasses all previous ones in size, scale, and scope, reflecting the growing significance that AI is coming to hold in all of our lives.

Read more

5/31/2024

Quantifying the Benefit of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research

Jian Gao, Dashun Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

The ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) revolution has the potential to change almost every line of work. As AI capabilities continue to improve in accuracy, robustness, and reach, AI may outperform and even replace human experts across many valuable tasks. Despite enormous effort devoted to understanding the impact of AI on labor and the economy and AI's recent successes in accelerating scientific discovery and progress, we lack a systematic understanding of how AI advances may benefit scientific research across disciplines and fields. Here, drawing from the literature on the future of work and the science of science, we develop a measurement framework to estimate both the direct use of AI and the potential benefit of AI in scientific research, applying natural language processing techniques to 74.6 million publications and 7.1 million patents. We find that the use of AI in research is widespread throughout the sciences, growing especially rapidly since 2015, and papers that use AI exhibit a citation premium, more likely to be highly cited both within and outside their disciplines. Moreover, our analysis reveals considerable potential for AI to benefit numerous scientific fields, yet a notable disconnect exists between AI education and its research applications, highlighting a mismatch between the supply of AI expertise and its demand in research. Lastly, we examine demographic disparities in AI's benefits across scientific disciplines and find that disciplines with a higher proportion of women or Black scientists tend to be associated with less benefit, suggesting that AI's growing impact on research may further exacerbate existing inequalities in science. As the connection between AI and scientific research deepens, our findings may become increasingly important, with implications for the equity and sustainability of the research enterprise.

Read more

6/4/2024