Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens
107
Sign in to get full access
Introduction
This paper explores the idea of incorporating "pause tokens" into language models during the training process. The key insight is that pauses in human speech can provide valuable information about the planning and production of language. By training language models to predict these pause tokens, the researchers aim to improve the models' ability to generate more natural and coherent language.
Preliminaries
The paper begins by discussing the importance of pause tokens in human language. Pauses can indicate cognitive processes like planning, reflecting, or searching for the right words. Incorporating this information into language models could help them better mimic human-like speech patterns and potentially improve their performance on tasks like dialogue generation.
Pause-training
Pause Token Prediction
The core of the paper's approach is to train language models to predict when pause tokens should occur in the generated text. This is done by augmenting the training data with special pause tokens, which the model must learn to predict alongside the regular text.
Architectural Modifications
To enable pause token prediction, the researchers made some modifications to the language model architecture. This includes adding a separate output layer to predict the pause tokens, as well as incorporating additional context information, such as the speaker's identity or the dialogue history.
Evaluation
The paper evaluates the pause-trained language models on a range of tasks, including text generation, dialogue, and language understanding. The results show that the pause-trained models outperform standard language models on metrics like fluency, coherence, and engagement.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving language models by incorporating pause information. However, the researchers acknowledge some limitations, such as the need for more diverse training data and the challenge of defining and detecting pauses in written text.
Conclusion
Overall, this research demonstrates the potential benefits of teaching language models to "think before they speak" by predicting when pauses should occur. By modeling this aspect of human language, the models can generate more natural and coherent output, with implications for a wide range of language-based applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
107
Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens
Sachin Goyal, Ziwei Ji, Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Krishna Menon, Sanjiv Kumar, Vaishnavh Nagarajan
Language models generate responses by producing a series of tokens in immediate succession: the $(K+1)^{th}$ token is an outcome of manipulating $K$ hidden vectors per layer, one vector per preceding token. What if instead we were to let the model manipulate say, $K+10$ hidden vectors, before it outputs the $(K+1)^{th}$ token? We operationalize this idea by performing training and inference on language models with a (learnable) $textit{pause}$ token, a sequence of which is appended to the input prefix. We then delay extracting the model's outputs until the last pause token is seen, thereby allowing the model to process extra computation before committing to an answer. We empirically evaluate $textit{pause-training}$ on decoder-only models of 1B and 130M parameters with causal pretraining on C4, and on downstream tasks covering reasoning, question-answering, general understanding and fact recall. Our main finding is that inference-time delays show gains when the model is both pre-trained and finetuned with delays. For the 1B model, we witness gains on 8 of 9 tasks, most prominently, a gain of $18%$ EM score on the QA task of SQuAD, $8%$ on CommonSenseQA and $1%$ accuracy on the reasoning task of GSM8k. Our work raises a range of conceptual and practical future research questions on making delayed next-token prediction a widely applicable new paradigm.
Read more4/23/2024
3
Do language models plan ahead for future tokens?
Wilson Wu, John X. Morris, Lionel Levine
Do transformers think ahead during inference at a given position? It is known transformers prepare information in the hidden states of the forward pass at time step $t$ that is then used in future forward passes $t+tau$. We posit two explanations for this phenomenon: pre-caching, in which off-diagonal gradient terms present during training result in the model computing features at $t$ irrelevant to the present inference task but useful for the future, and breadcrumbs, in which features most relevant to time step $t$ are already the same as those that would most benefit inference at time $t+tau$. We test these hypotheses by training language models without propagating gradients to past timesteps, a scheme we formalize as myopic training. In a constructed synthetic data setting, we find clear evidence for pre-caching. In the autoregressive language modeling setting, our experiments are more suggestive of the breadcrumbs hypothesis, though pre-caching increases with model scale.
Read more8/6/2024
💬
209
Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction
Fabian Gloeckle, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Baptiste Rozi`ere, David Lopez-Paz, Gabriel Synnaeve
Large language models such as GPT and Llama are trained with a next-token prediction loss. In this work, we suggest that training language models to predict multiple future tokens at once results in higher sample efficiency. More specifically, at each position in the training corpus, we ask the model to predict the following n tokens using n independent output heads, operating on top of a shared model trunk. Considering multi-token prediction as an auxiliary training task, we measure improved downstream capabilities with no overhead in training time for both code and natural language models. The method is increasingly useful for larger model sizes, and keeps its appeal when training for multiple epochs. Gains are especially pronounced on generative benchmarks like coding, where our models consistently outperform strong baselines by several percentage points. Our 13B parameter models solves 12 % more problems on HumanEval and 17 % more on MBPP than comparable next-token models. Experiments on small algorithmic tasks demonstrate that multi-token prediction is favorable for the development of induction heads and algorithmic reasoning capabilities. As an additional benefit, models trained with 4-token prediction are up to 3 times faster at inference, even with large batch sizes.
Read more5/1/2024
0
Learning to Plan Long-Term for Language Modeling
Florian Mai, Nathan Cornille, Marie-Francine Moens
Modern language models predict the next token in the sequence by considering the past text through a powerful function such as attention. However, language models have no explicit mechanism that allows them to spend computation time for planning long-distance future text, leading to a suboptimal token prediction. In this paper, we propose a planner that predicts a latent plan for many sentences into the future. By sampling multiple plans at once, we condition the language model on an accurate approximation of the distribution of text continuations, which leads to better next token prediction accuracy. In effect, this allows trading computation time for prediction accuracy.
Read more9/4/2024