0
0
Thermodynamics-inspired Explanations of Artificial Intelligence
Overview
- Predictive machine learning models have become widely used, but their "black-box" nature makes it challenging to trust their accuracy.
- Explanation techniques that help humans understand the reasoning behind these models' predictions could help build trust.
- Assessing the human interpretability of these explanations is a nontrivial problem.
- This paper introduces a new method called TERP to generate accurate and human-interpretable explanations for black-box models across various domains.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models have become very powerful at making predictions, but they can sometimes be like "black boxes" - it's not always clear how they arrive at their conclusions. This can make it hard to trust these models, especially in important applications.
One way to build trust is to use "explanation techniques" that help humans understand the reasoning behind a model's predictions. But figuring out how well these explanations can be understood by people is a tricky challenge.
In this paper, the researchers introduce a new method called TERP that can generate explanations for black-box models that are both accurate and easy for humans to understand. They show how TERP can be used to explain different types of machine learning models, like neural networks and deep learning models, across a variety of fields like molecular simulations, text, and image classification.
Technical Explanation
The researchers introduce a new concept called "interpretation entropy" as a way to measure how easy it is for humans to understand the explanations generated for black-box machine learning models. They then present the TERP (Thermodynamics-inspired Explainable Representations of AI and other black-box Paradigms) method, which uses this interpretation entropy concept to produce accurate and interpretable explanations in a model-agnostic way.
TERP works by first training a separate "explanation model" that tries to mimic the behavior of the original black-box model. This explanation model is designed to be as simple and interpretable as possible, while still making accurate predictions. The researchers then use the interpretation entropy metric to ensure the explanations generated by this model are easy for humans to understand.
To demonstrate the versatility of TERP, the researchers apply it to explain the predictions of various complex machine learning models, including deep learning autoencoders, recurrent neural networks, and convolutional neural networks, across diverse domains like molecular simulations, text, and image classification.
Critical Analysis
The TERP method proposed in this paper represents a promising approach to the challenge of making black-box machine learning models more interpretable and trustworthy. By using an interpretability metric based on thermodynamic principles, the researchers have developed a systematic way to generate human-understandable explanations for complex model predictions.
One potential limitation of the work is that the interpretation entropy metric, while theoretically grounded, may not always align perfectly with human intuitions about interpretability. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest further user studies to validate the approach.
Additionally, while TERP is described as model-agnostic, it's unclear how well the method would scale to extremely large and complex models, such as very deep neural networks or transformer-based language models. The computational overhead of training the separate explanation model may become prohibitive for such architectures.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI, demonstrating a novel and principled approach to the interpretability challenge. The TERP method is an important step forward in building trust and understanding around the increasingly influential role of black-box machine learning models in scientific and real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new method called TERP that can generate accurate and human-interpretable explanations for the predictions of black-box machine learning models. By using a thermodynamics-inspired concept called "interpretation entropy," TERP is able to produce explanations that are easy for humans to understand, while still capturing the essential reasoning of the original complex models.
The researchers demonstrate the broad applicability of TERP by using it to explain the predictions of various types of neural networks across diverse domains, from molecular simulations to text and image classification. This work represents an important step forward in building trust and transparency around the growing use of powerful but opaque machine learning techniques in high-stakes applications.
As machine learning continues to have an ever-greater impact on scientific research and real-world decision-making, methods like TERP will become increasingly crucial for ensuring these models are not treated as black boxes, but are understood and accepted by the humans who rely on their outputs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
0
Trustworthy Conceptual Explanations for Neural Networks in Robot Decision-Making
Som Sagar, Aditya Taparia, Harsh Mankodiya, Pranav Bidare, Yifan Zhou, Ransalu Senanayake
Black box neural networks are an indispensable part of modern robots. Nevertheless, deploying such high-stakes systems in real-world scenarios poses significant challenges when the stakeholders, such as engineers and legislative bodies, lack insights into the neural networks' decision-making process. Presently, explainable AI is primarily tailored to natural language processing and computer vision, falling short in two critical aspects when applied in robots: grounding in decision-making tasks and the ability to assess trustworthiness of their explanations. In this paper, we introduce a trustworthy explainable robotics technique based on human-interpretable, high-level concepts that attribute to the decisions made by the neural network. Our proposed technique provides explanations with associated uncertainty scores by matching neural network's activations with human-interpretable visualizations. To validate our approach, we conducted a series of experiments with various simulated and real-world robot decision-making models, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach as a post-hoc, human-friendly robot learning diagnostic tool.
Read more9/18/2024
0
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
Read more5/29/2024
🧠
0
Explaining Explaining
Sergei Nirenburg, Marjorie McShane, Kenneth W. Goodman, Sanjay Oruganti
Explanation is key to people having confidence in high-stakes AI systems. However, machine-learning-based systems -- which account for almost all current AI -- can't explain because they are usually black boxes. The explainable AI (XAI) movement hedges this problem by redefining explanation. The human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI) movement identifies the explanation-oriented needs of users but can't fulfill them because of its commitment to machine learning. In order to achieve the kinds of explanations needed by real people operating in critical domains, we must rethink how to approach AI. We describe a hybrid approach to developing cognitive agents that uses a knowledge-based infrastructure supplemented by data obtained through machine learning when applicable. These agents will serve as assistants to humans who will bear ultimate responsibility for the decisions and actions of the human-robot team. We illustrate the explanatory potential of such agents using the under-the-hood panels of a demonstration system in which a team of simulated robots collaborate on a search task assigned by a human.
Read more9/30/2024
0
Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review
Leonard Bereska, Efstratios Gavves
Understanding AI systems' inner workings is critical for ensuring value alignment and safety. This review explores mechanistic interpretability: reverse engineering the computational mechanisms and representations learned by neural networks into human-understandable algorithms and concepts to provide a granular, causal understanding. We establish foundational concepts such as features encoding knowledge within neural activations and hypotheses about their representation and computation. We survey methodologies for causally dissecting model behaviors and assess the relevance of mechanistic interpretability to AI safety. We examine benefits in understanding, control, alignment, and risks such as capability gains and dual-use concerns. We investigate challenges surrounding scalability, automation, and comprehensive interpretation. We advocate for clarifying concepts, setting standards, and scaling techniques to handle complex models and behaviors and expand to domains such as vision and reinforcement learning. Mechanistic interpretability could help prevent catastrophic outcomes as AI systems become more powerful and inscrutable.
Read more8/27/2024