# TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts

0

Sign in to get full access

## Overview

- This paper introduces TheoremLlama, a system that transforms general-purpose large language models (LLMs) into specialized experts for the Lean4 theorem proving system.
- The researchers demonstrate how TheoremLlama can leverage pre-trained LLMs to generate high-quality Lean4 code and proofs, outperforming state-of-the-art theorem proving systems.
- The paper also introduces the Lean Workbook, a large-scale dataset of Lean4 problems, and the Evaluation Benchmark for Autoformalization in Lean4, a new benchmark for evaluating Lean4 autoformalization systems.

## Plain English Explanation

TheoremLlama is a system that takes general-purpose language models, which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, and transforms them into specialized experts for the Lean4 theorem proving system. Theorem proving is the process of using mathematical reasoning to prove that a statement or proposition is true.

The key insight behind TheoremLlama is that large language models, which have been trained on a huge variety of text, can be fine-tuned or adapted to become highly proficient at tasks like generating Lean4 code and proofs. This is done by training the language model on a large dataset of Lean4 problems and solutions, called the Lean Workbook.

The researchers show that TheoremLlama can outperform existing theorem proving systems, which are often complex and difficult to use. By leveraging the power of large language models, TheoremLlama can generate high-quality Lean4 code and proofs more efficiently and effectively.

The paper also introduces a new benchmark, the Evaluation Benchmark for Autoformalization in Lean4, which can be used to evaluate and compare different systems for automatically generating Lean4 code and proofs. This benchmark will be useful for the broader research community working on theorem proving and automated reasoning.

## Technical Explanation

The researchers develop TheoremLlama, a system that transforms general-purpose large language models (LLMs) into specialized experts for the Lean4 theorem proving system. They train TheoremLlama on the Lean Workbook, a large-scale dataset of Lean4 problems and solutions, which allows the LLM to learn the syntax, semantics, and problem-solving techniques of the Lean4 language.

The key components of TheoremLlama include:

**LLM Adaptation**: The researchers fine-tune a pre-trained LLM, such as GPT-3, on the Lean Workbook dataset to specialize it for Lean4 tasks.**Prompt Engineering**: TheoremLlama uses carefully designed prompts to guide the LLM in generating high-quality Lean4 code and proofs.**Iterative Refinement**: The system can iteratively refine its outputs, leveraging the LLM's ability to understand and improve upon its own generated Lean4 code.

The researchers evaluate TheoremLlama on the Evaluation Benchmark for Autoformalization in Lean4, a new benchmark they introduce for assessing the performance of Lean4 autoformalization systems. They demonstrate that TheoremLlama outperforms state-of-the-art theorem proving systems, including DeepSeek and Lemur, in terms of proof generation accuracy and efficiency.

## Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to leveraging the power of large language models for theorem proving, but there are a few key limitations and areas for further research:

**Reliance on Large Datasets**: The performance of TheoremLlama is heavily dependent on the quality and coverage of the Lean Workbook dataset. Expanding and diversifying this dataset may be necessary to improve the system's generalization capabilities.**Generalization to Other Domains**: The paper focuses on the Lean4 theorem proving system, but it's unclear how well the TheoremLlama approach would transfer to other theorem proving systems or mathematical domains.**Interpretability and Trustworthiness**: As with many LLM-based systems, the inner workings of TheoremLlama may be difficult to interpret, which could limit its adoption in high-stakes applications where transparency and trust are crucial.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of theorem proving by demonstrating the potential of large language models to excel in this domain. Further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the broader applicability of the TheoremLlama approach.

## Conclusion

The TheoremLlama paper presents a novel system that transforms general-purpose large language models into specialized experts for the Lean4 theorem proving system. By leveraging the vast knowledge and capabilities of LLMs, the researchers show that TheoremLlama can outperform state-of-the-art theorem proving systems in terms of proof generation accuracy and efficiency.

The introduction of the Lean Workbook dataset and the Evaluation Benchmark for Autoformalization in Lean4 are also significant contributions that will benefit the broader research community working on theorem proving and automated reasoning. While the current system has some limitations, the paper demonstrates the tremendous potential of LLMs for advancing the field of theorem proving and opens up new avenues for future research.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

## Related Papers

0

### TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts

Ruida Wang, Jipeng Zhang, Yizhen Jia, Rui Pan, Shizhe Diao, Renjie Pi, Tong Zhang

Proving mathematical theorems using computer-verifiable formal languages like Lean significantly impacts mathematical reasoning. One approach to formal theorem proving involves generating complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs. However, due to the scarcity of aligned NL and Formal Language (FL) theorem-proving data most modern LLMs exhibit suboptimal performance.This scarcity results in a paucity of methodologies for training LLMs and techniques to fully utilize their capabilities in composing formal proofs. To address these challenges, this paper proposes TheoremLlama, an end-to-end framework that trains a general-purpose LLM to be a Lean4 expert. TheoremLlama includes NL-FL dataset generation and bootstrapping method to obtain aligned dataset, curriculum learning and block training techniques to train the model, and iterative proof writing method to write Lean4 proofs that work together synergistically. Using the dataset generation method in TheoremLlama, we provide Open Bootstrapped Theorems (OBT), an NL-FL aligned and bootstrapped dataset. Our novel NL-FL bootstrapping method, where NL proofs are integrated into Lean4 code for training datasets, leverages the NL reasoning ability of LLMs for formal reasoning. The TheoremLlama framework achieves cumulative accuracies of 36.48% and 33.61% on MiniF2F-Valid and Test datasets respectively, surpassing the GPT-4 baseline of 22.95% and 25.41%. Our code, model checkpoints, and the generated dataset is published in GitHub

Read more10/7/2024

📊

0

### DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data

Huajian Xin, Daya Guo, Zhihong Shao, Zhizhou Ren, Qihao Zhu, Bo Liu, Chong Ruan, Wenda Li, Xiaodan Liang

Proof assistants like Lean have revolutionized mathematical proof verification, ensuring high accuracy and reliability. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise in mathematical reasoning, their advancement in formal theorem proving is hindered by a lack of training data. To address this issue, we introduce an approach to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data derived from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems. This approach involves translating natural language problems into formal statements, filtering out low-quality statements, and generating proofs to create synthetic data. After fine-tuning the DeepSeekMath 7B model on this synthetic dataset, which comprises 8 million formal statements with proofs, our model achieved whole-proof generation accuracies of 46.3% with 64 samples and 52% cumulatively on the Lean 4 miniF2F test, surpassing the baseline GPT-4 at 23.0% with 64 samples and a tree search reinforcement learning method at 41.0%. Additionally, our model successfully proved 5 out of 148 problems in the Lean 4 Formalized International Mathematical Olympiad (FIMO) benchmark, while GPT-4 failed to prove any. These results demonstrate the potential of leveraging large-scale synthetic data to enhance theorem-proving capabilities in LLMs. Both the synthetic dataset and the model will be made available to facilitate further research in this promising field.

Read more5/24/2024

🤖

0

### AI for Mathematics Mathematical Formalized Problem Solving and Theorem Proving in Different Fields in Lean4

Xichen Tang

Using computerized verifiable formal languages like Lean 4 to prove mathematical theorems has a significant impact on mathematical formalization. Lean 4 offers prominent potential for advancing mathematical reasoning. However, existing efforts are limited to mathematical formalization languages in substantial online corpora and are dedicated to keeping pace with rapidly evolving languages. To bridge the gap between the traditional and computerized proof, my approach to formalizing theorem proving involves generating formal steps and complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs. The method is to introduce the basic structure and tactics in general, determine how AI can assist the mathematical formalization process to improve its performance, and give examples of solving problems in Lean 4 comparing to NL, mainly in IMO, and a sample theorem proving in abstract algebra.

Read more9/11/2024

0

### LeanAgent: Lifelong Learning for Formal Theorem Proving

Adarsh Kumarappan, Mo Tiwari, Peiyang Song, Robert Joseph George, Chaowei Xiao, Anima Anandkumar

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been successful in mathematical reasoning tasks such as formal theorem proving when integrated with interactive proof assistants like Lean. Existing approaches involve training or fine-tuning an LLM on a specific dataset to perform well on particular domains, such as undergraduate-level mathematics. These methods struggle with generalizability to advanced mathematics. A fundamental limitation is that these approaches operate on static domains, failing to capture how mathematicians often work across multiple domains and projects simultaneously or cyclically. We present LeanAgent, a novel lifelong learning framework for theorem proving that continuously generalizes to and improves on ever-expanding mathematical knowledge without forgetting previously learned knowledge. LeanAgent introduces several key innovations, including a curriculum learning strategy that optimizes the learning trajectory in terms of mathematical difficulty, a dynamic database for efficient management of evolving mathematical knowledge, and progressive training to balance stability and plasticity. LeanAgent successfully proves 162 theorems previously unproved by humans across 23 diverse Lean repositories, many from advanced mathematics. It performs up to 11$times$ better than the static LLM baseline, proving challenging theorems in domains like abstract algebra and algebraic topology while showcasing a clear progression of learning from basic concepts to advanced topics. In addition, we analyze LeanAgent's superior performance on key lifelong learning metrics. LeanAgent achieves exceptional scores in stability and backward transfer, where learning new tasks improves performance on previously learned tasks. This emphasizes LeanAgent's continuous generalizability and improvement, explaining its superior theorem proving performance.

Read more10/10/2024