A Survey in Mathematical Language Processing

2205.15231

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/9/2024 by Jordan Meadows, Andre Freitas

💬

Abstract

Informal mathematical text underpins real-world quantitative reasoning and communication. Developing sophisticated methods of retrieval and abstraction from this dual modality is crucial in the pursuit of the vision of automating discovery in quantitative science and mathematics. We track the development of informal mathematical language processing approaches across five strategic sub-areas in recent years, highlighting the prevailing successful methodological elements along with existing limitations.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Informal mathematical text is crucial for quantitative reasoning and communication in the real world.
  • Developing sophisticated methods to retrieve and abstract information from this dual modality (text and mathematical content) is key to automating discovery in quantitative science and mathematics.
  • This paper tracks the development of approaches for processing informal mathematical language across five strategic sub-areas in recent years, highlighting both successes and limitations.

Plain English Explanation

Mathematical concepts and reasoning are often expressed in informal, natural language rather than formal, symbolic representations. This informal mathematical text is critical for how quantitative information is understood and communicated in the real world.

To automate the process of scientific and mathematical discovery, researchers need to develop advanced techniques to extract and abstract key information from this dual modality of text and mathematical content.

This paper examines the progress made in this area over recent years, looking at five key sub-topics. It identifies the methodological elements that have been most successful, as well as the limitations that still exist in this rapidly evolving field.

Technical Explanation

The paper tracks the development of approaches for processing informal mathematical language across five strategic sub-areas:

  1. Recognizing and extracting mathematical expressions from text
  2. Interpreting the semantics and logical structure of informal mathematical content
  3. Aligning informal mathematical text with formal representations
  4. Generating natural language explanations of mathematical concepts and procedures
  5. Applying language models to automate mathematical reasoning and problem-solving

For each sub-area, the authors highlight the prevailing successful methodological elements, such as the use of large language models and advanced natural language processing techniques. They also discuss the existing limitations and challenges that researchers continue to grapple with.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the progress made in processing informal mathematical language using modern AI and natural language processing techniques. However, it also acknowledges the significant challenges that remain, particularly in areas like semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and generating human-like explanations of mathematical concepts.

One potential limitation is that the review is focused on recent research, so it may not capture the full historical context and evolution of this field. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific architectural choices, training approaches, or evaluation methodologies used in the various studies it cites.

Overall, this paper serves as a valuable snapshot of the current state of the art in using large language models for mathematical de-formalization and naturalization, highlighting both the exciting progress and the substantial work that remains to be done in this important area of research.

Conclusion

Informal mathematical text is a crucial component of real-world quantitative reasoning and communication. Developing effective methods to retrieve and abstract information from this dual modality of text and mathematical content is crucial for automating scientific and mathematical discovery.

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of recent research progress in this area, identifying both successful methodological elements and persistent limitations. While significant strides have been made, particularly through the use of large language models, substantial challenges remain in areas like semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and generating human-like explanations of mathematical concepts.

Overcoming these challenges will be key to realizing the vision of AI systems that can truly assist and collaborate with humans in the pursuit of quantitative knowledge and insights.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges

Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges

Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng Yin

YC

0

Reddit

0

Mathematical reasoning serves as a cornerstone for assessing the fundamental cognitive capabilities of human intelligence. In recent times, there has been a notable surge in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. However, the landscape of mathematical problem types is vast and varied, with LLM-oriented techniques undergoing evaluation across diverse datasets and settings. This diversity makes it challenging to discern the true advancements and obstacles within this burgeoning field. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions: i) a comprehensive exploration of the various mathematical problems and their corresponding datasets that have been investigated; ii) an examination of the spectrum of LLM-oriented techniques that have been proposed for mathematical problem-solving; iii) an overview of factors and concerns affecting LLMs in solving math; and iv) an elucidation of the persisting challenges within this domain. To the best of our knowledge, this survey stands as one of the first extensive examinations of the landscape of LLMs in the realm of mathematics, providing a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.

Read more

4/8/2024

Mathematical Entities: Corpora and Benchmarks

Mathematical Entities: Corpora and Benchmarks

Jacob Collard, Valeria de Paiva, Eswaran Subrahmanian

YC

0

Reddit

0

Mathematics is a highly specialized domain with its own unique set of challenges. Despite this, there has been relatively little research on natural language processing for mathematical texts, and there are few mathematical language resources aimed at NLP. In this paper, we aim to provide annotated corpora that can be used to study the language of mathematics in different contexts, ranging from fundamental concepts found in textbooks to advanced research mathematics. We preprocess the corpora with a neural parsing model and some manual intervention to provide part-of-speech tags, lemmas, and dependency trees. In total, we provide 182397 sentences across three corpora. We then aim to test and evaluate several noteworthy natural language processing models using these corpora, to show how well they can adapt to the domain of mathematics and provide useful tools for exploring mathematical language. We evaluate several neural and symbolic models against benchmarks that we extract from the corpus metadata to show that terminology extraction and definition extraction do not easily generalize to mathematics, and that additional work is needed to achieve good performance on these metrics. Finally, we provide a learning assistant that grants access to the content of these corpora in a context-sensitive manner, utilizing text search and entity linking. Though our corpora and benchmarks provide useful metrics for evaluating mathematical language processing, further work is necessary to adapt models to mathematics in order to provide more effective learning assistants and apply NLP methods to different mathematical domains.

Read more

6/18/2024

🧠

New!The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble that of spatial cognition more than natural language processing

Yuannan Li, Shan Xu, Jia Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

The ability to manipulate logical-mathematical symbols (LMS), encompassing tasks such as calculation, reasoning, and programming, is a cognitive skill arguably unique to humans. Considering the relatively recent emergence of this ability in human evolutionary history, it has been suggested that LMS processing may build upon more fundamental cognitive systems, possibly through neuronal recycling. Previous studies have pinpointed two primary candidates, natural language processing and spatial cognition. Existing comparisons between these domains largely relied on task-level comparison, which may be confounded by task idiosyncrasy. The present study instead compared the neural correlates at the domain level with both automated meta-analysis and synthesized maps based on three representative LMS tasks, reasoning, calculation, and mental programming. Our results revealed a more substantial cortical overlap between LMS processing and spatial cognition, in contrast to language processing. Furthermore, in regions activated by both spatial and language processing, the multivariate activation pattern for LMS processing exhibited greater multivariate similarity to spatial cognition than to language processing. A hierarchical clustering analysis further indicated that typical LMS tasks were indistinguishable from spatial cognition tasks at the neural level, suggesting an inherent connection between these two cognitive processes. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that spatial cognition is likely the basis of LMS processing, which may shed light on the limitations of large language models in logical reasoning, particularly those trained exclusively on textual data without explicit emphasis on spatial content.

Read more

6/21/2024

Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks

Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks

Avinash Anand, Mohit Gupta, Kritarth Prasad, Navya Singla, Sanjana Sanjeev, Jatin Kumar, Adarsh Raj Shivam, Rajiv Ratn Shah

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rapid progress in the field of natural language processing (NLP) systems and the expansion of large language models (LLMs) have opened up numerous opportunities in the field of education and instructional methods. These advancements offer the potential for tailored learning experiences and immediate feedback, all delivered through accessible and cost-effective services. One notable application area for this technological advancement is in the realm of solving mathematical problems. Mathematical problem-solving not only requires the ability to decipher complex problem statements but also the skill to perform precise arithmetic calculations at each step of the problem-solving process. However, the evaluation of the arithmetic capabilities of large language models remains an area that has received relatively little attention. In response, we introduce an extensive mathematics dataset called MathQuest sourced from the 11th and 12th standard Mathematics NCERT textbooks. This dataset encompasses mathematical challenges of varying complexity and covers a wide range of mathematical concepts. Utilizing this dataset, we conduct fine-tuning experiments with three prominent LLMs: LLaMA-2, WizardMath, and MAmmoTH. These fine-tuned models serve as benchmarks for evaluating their performance on our dataset. Our experiments reveal that among the three models, MAmmoTH-13B emerges as the most proficient, achieving the highest level of competence in solving the presented mathematical problems. Consequently, MAmmoTH-13B establishes itself as a robust and dependable benchmark for addressing NCERT mathematics problems.

Read more

4/23/2024