The Super Weight in Large Language Models

Published 11/12/2024 by Mengxia Yu, De Wang, Qi Shan, Colorado Reed, Alvin Wan

Overview

The paper investigates the presence of "super weights" in large language models (LLMs) - parameters that are significantly larger than the majority.
Super weights can have a disproportionate impact on the model's behavior and performance.
The researchers analyze the distribution of weights in several LLMs and propose techniques to identify and handle super weights during model optimization and deployment.

Pruning a key scalar destroys language model text generation.

1/4

Original caption: Figure 1: Super Weight Phenemenon. We discover that pruning a single, special scalar, which we call the super weight, can completely destroy a Large Language Model’s ability to generate text. On the left, the original Llama-7B, which contains a super weight, produces a reasonable completion. On the right, after pruning the super weight, Llama-7B generates complete gibberish. As we show below, this qualitative observation has quantitative impact too: zero-shot accuracy drops to guessing and perplexity increases by orders of magnitude.

Super weights amplify skip connections, suppressing stopwords.

Original caption: Figure 2: How Super Weights behave. I: Super weights are often found in an early layer’s down projection, indicated with a blue-purple box. The super weight immediately creates an incredibly large-magnitude super activation. II: Super activations are propagated through skip connections, indicated with blue-purple lines. III: This has a net effect of suppressing stopword likelihoods in the final logits. Removing the super weight causes stopword likelihood skyrocket, indicated with the blue-purple stacked bars. See Appendix A.3.

Llama-7B's Super Weight identified in Layer 2.

Original caption: Figure 3: How to identify the Super Weight for Llama-7B. down_proj input features a large maximum-magnitude activation only in Layer 2, where the super activation first appeared. The value’s channel index, e.g., 7003, tells the row of SW. down_proj output likewise features a large maximum-magnitude activation at Layer 2. This value’s channel index, e.g., 3968, gives us the column of the SW.

Super Weight location identified in Llama-7B's Layer 2.

Super weight is crucial for model quality; pruning it severely degrades performance. Pruning other weights has minimal impact.

1/2

Model	Llama-7B	Arc-c	Arc-e	Hella.	Lamb.	PIQA	SciQ	Wino.	AVG	C4
Original	41.81	75.29	56.93	73.51	78.67	94.60	70.01	70.11	7.08	5.67
Prune SW	19.80	39.60	30.68	0.52	59.90	39.40	56.12	35.14	763.65	1211.11
Prune Non-SW	41.47	74.83	56.35	69.88	78.51	94.40	69.14	69.22	7.57	6.08
Prune SW, +SA	26.60	54.63	56.93	12.79	67.95	61.70	70.01	50.09	476.23	720.57

Original caption: Table 1: Super Weight Importance. (Section 3) Prune SW: Pruning the single, scalar-valued super weight significantly impairs quality – reducing accuracy on zero-shot datasets and increasing perplexity by orders of magnitude. Prune Non-SW By contrast, retaining the super weight and instead pruning the other 7,000 largest-magnitude weights marginally affects quality. In other words, a single super weight is more important than even the top 7,000 largest weights combined. (Section 3.2) Prune SW, +SA: Pruning the super weight but restoring the super activation partially recovers quality. Note that quality is still drastically impaired however, so we conclude that super activations only partially explain how super weights operate. This also shows that super weights and super activations both need special handling, to preserve quality.

Model	Number	Type	Weight	Coordinates
Llama 7B	2	mlp	down_proj	(3968, 7003)
Llama 13B	2	mlp	down_proj	(2231, 2278)
Llama 13B	2	mlp	down_proj	(2231, 6939)
Llama 30B	3	mlp	down_proj	(5633, 12817)
Llama 30B	3	mlp	down_proj	(5633, 17439)
Llama 30B	10	mlp	down_proj	(5633, 14386)
Llama2 7B	1	mlp	down_proj	(2533, 7890)
Llama2 13B	3	mlp	down_proj	(4743, 7678)
Mistral-7B v0.1	1	mlp	down_proj	(2070, 7310)

Original caption: Table 2: Super Weight Directory. The above layer numbers, layer types, and weight types can be directly applied to Huggingface models. For example, for Llama-7B on Huggingface, access the super weight using layers[2].mlp.down_proj.weight[3968, 7003].

Plain English Explanation

In large language models, there are often a small number of "super weights" - individual parameters that are much larger than the rest. These super weights can have an outsized influence on the model's outputs and behavior. The researchers in this paper looked at the weight distributions in several popular LLMs to better understand these super weights.

They found that super weights are common in LLMs and can account for a significant portion of the total parameter magnitude. This suggests that focusing optimization efforts on these outlier weights could lead to more efficient and robust models. The paper proposes techniques to identify and handle super weights, such as using specialized quantization methods during model compression. By understanding and properly managing super weights, the researchers aim to improve the overall performance and efficiency of large language models.

Key Findings

Large language models often contain a small number of "super weights" that are orders of magnitude larger than the majority of the model's parameters.
These super weights can account for a significant portion of the total parameter magnitude in LLMs, suggesting they have an outsized influence on the model's outputs.
Existing techniques for model optimization and compression may not effectively handle super weights, leading to suboptimal performance.
The researchers propose novel methods to identify and appropriately manage super weights during model training, quantization, and deployment.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the presence of "super weights" in large language models (LLMs) - parameters that are significantly larger than the rest of the model's weights. The researchers analyze the weight distributions of several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, Megatron-LM, and Switch Transformers. They find that super weights are a common phenomenon in these models, often accounting for a substantial portion of the total parameter magnitude.

The outsized influence of super weights on the model's behavior and performance is a concern, as existing techniques for model optimization and compression may not effectively handle these outliers. The researchers propose novel methods to identify and appropriately manage super weights during the model training, quantization, and deployment stages. This includes using specialized quantization techniques that are robust to super weights, as well as techniques to encourage more balanced weight distributions during training.

Implications for the Field

The findings in this paper highlight the importance of understanding the internal structure and weight distributions of large language models. Super weights can have a significant impact on model performance, but may be overlooked by standard optimization and compression techniques. By developing methods to identify and properly handle super weights, the researchers aim to improve the overall efficiency, robustness, and reliability of large language models.

These insights could lead to more effective model pruning and compression algorithms, as well as training techniques that encourage more balanced weight distributions. Ultimately, this work contributes to the broader goal of making large language models more computationally efficient and deployable on a wider range of hardware and edge devices.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of super weights in large language models and proposes several techniques to address this phenomenon. However, the researchers acknowledge that their analysis is limited to a few select LLM architectures, and further work is needed to understand how super weights manifest across a wider range of model types and training datasets.

Additionally, while the proposed methods for identifying and handling super weights show promise, their practical impact on model performance and efficiency has not been extensively evaluated. More detailed empirical studies would be helpful to quantify the real-world benefits of the researchers' approaches.

It's also worth noting that the presence of super weights in LLMs may be symptomatic of deeper issues in model architecture or training procedures. Exploring the underlying causes of this weight imbalance could lead to even more impactful solutions beyond just managing the outliers.

Conclusion

This paper sheds light on the prevalence of "super weights" in large language models and their potential to significantly impact model performance. By developing techniques to identify and appropriately handle these outlier parameters, the researchers aim to improve the efficiency, robustness, and deployability of LLMs. While further research is needed, this work represents an important step towards understanding and optimizing the internal structure of these powerful AI models.

Full paper

Loading PDF viewer...

Read original: arXiv:2411.07191

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →