Subtoxic Questions: Dive Into Attitude Change of LLM's Response in Jailbreak Attempts

2404.08309

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/15/2024 by Tianyu Zhang, Zixuan Zhao, Jiaqi Huang, Jingyu Hua, Sheng Zhong
Subtoxic Questions: Dive Into Attitude Change of LLM's Response in Jailbreak Attempts

Abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) of Prompt Jailbreaking are getting more and more attention, it is of great significance to raise a generalized research paradigm to evaluate attack strengths and a basic model to conduct subtler experiments. In this paper, we propose a novel approach by focusing on a set of target questions that are inherently more sensitive to jailbreak prompts, aiming to circumvent the limitations posed by enhanced LLM security. Through designing and analyzing these sensitive questions, this paper reveals a more effective method of identifying vulnerabilities in LLMs, thereby contributing to the advancement of LLM security. This research not only challenges existing jailbreaking methodologies but also fortifies LLMs against potential exploits.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the "subtoxic question" phenomenon, where language models (LLMs) may exhibit changes in their responses when faced with jailbreak attempts.
  • The researchers investigate how LLMs' attitudes and behaviors can shift in response to subtoxic questions, which are designed to circumvent safety measures and push the model towards undesirable actions.
  • The paper introduces the GAC (Generalized Attitude Change) model, a framework for understanding and predicting attitude changes in LLMs during jailbreak attempts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines a problem called "subtoxic questions" that can affect how language models (LLMs) respond when people try to "jailbreak" or bypass the model's safety features. Jailbreaking refers to attempts to get an LLM to do something it's not supposed to do, like saying harmful things.

The researchers use the GAC (Generalized Attitude Change) model to understand how an LLM's attitudes and behaviors can change when faced with subtoxic questions. Subtoxic questions are designed to trick the model into changing its responses in undesirable ways, even if the questions don't seem overtly harmful.

The goal is to better understand how LLMs can be influenced by subtle prompts and to find ways to make them more robust against these types of jailbreak attempts.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of "subtoxic questions" and how they can impact the responses of language models (LLMs) during jailbreak attempts. Jailbreaking refers to techniques used to bypass an LLM's safety features and get it to produce undesirable outputs.

The researchers propose the GAC (Generalized Attitude Change) model as a framework for understanding and predicting how an LLM's attitudes and behaviors can shift in response to subtoxic questions. The GAC model suggests that LLMs can exhibit complex attitude changes, including polarization, when faced with subtle prompts designed to circumvent safety measures.

The paper also discusses the JailbreakV benchmark, which is used to assess the robustness of LLMs against various jailbreak techniques, including Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts. Additionally, the authors explore strategies for making LLMs more resilient to jailbreak attempts.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable framework for understanding the complex dynamics of how LLMs can be influenced by subtoxic questions during jailbreak attempts. The GAC model offers a promising approach for predicting and mitigating these attitude changes, but it would be helpful to see more empirical validation and testing of the model's accuracy and generalizability.

One limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on language-based jailbreak attempts, while LLMs are increasingly being used in multimodal settings. It would be valuable to explore how subtoxic prompts and attitude changes might manifest in these more complex, multi-input environments.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of these findings. As LLMs become more ubiquitous, it will be crucial to consider the societal impacts of subtle techniques that can influence their behavior, both for good and for ill.

Conclusion

This paper sheds light on the important issue of subtoxic questions and their potential to influence the responses of language models during jailbreak attempts. The GAC model provides a valuable framework for understanding and predicting these attitude changes, which could inform the development of more robust and resilient LLMs.

As the use of LLMs continues to expand, it will be crucial to address the challenges posed by subtoxic questions and other jailbreak techniques. The insights from this research can help guide the development of safety-focused AI systems that are better equipped to withstand subtle attempts to undermine their intended behaviors and outputs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models

A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models

Zihao Xu, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Stjepan Picek

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMS) have increasingly become central to generating content with potential societal impacts. Notably, these models have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. To mitigate these risks, researchers have adopted safety training techniques to align model outputs with societal values to curb the generation of malicious content. However, the phenomenon of jailbreaking, where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models, persists as a significant challenge. This research conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. We meticulously investigate nine attack techniques and seven defense techniques applied across three distinct language models: Vicuna, LLama, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of these attack and defense techniques. Our findings reveal that existing white-box attacks underperform compared to universal techniques and that including special tokens in the input significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. This research highlights the need to concentrate on the security facets of LLMs. Additionally, we contribute to the field by releasing our datasets and testing framework, aiming to foster further research into LLM security. We believe these contributions will facilitate the exploration of security measures within this domain.

Read more

5/20/2024

💬

Do Anything Now: Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models

Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen, Yang Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

The misuse of large language models (LLMs) has drawn significant attention from the general public and LLM vendors. One particular type of adversarial prompt, known as jailbreak prompt, has emerged as the main attack vector to bypass the safeguards and elicit harmful content from LLMs. In this paper, employing our new framework JailbreakHub, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of 1,405 jailbreak prompts spanning from December 2022 to December 2023. We identify 131 jailbreak communities and discover unique characteristics of jailbreak prompts and their major attack strategies, such as prompt injection and privilege escalation. We also observe that jailbreak prompts increasingly shift from online Web communities to prompt-aggregation websites and 28 user accounts have consistently optimized jailbreak prompts over 100 days. To assess the potential harm caused by jailbreak prompts, we create a question set comprising 107,250 samples across 13 forbidden scenarios. Leveraging this dataset, our experiments on six popular LLMs show that their safeguards cannot adequately defend jailbreak prompts in all scenarios. Particularly, we identify five highly effective jailbreak prompts that achieve 0.95 attack success rates on ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and GPT-4, and the earliest one has persisted online for over 240 days. We hope that our study can facilitate the research community and LLM vendors in promoting safer and regulated LLMs.

Read more

5/16/2024

Towards Understanding Jailbreak Attacks in LLMs: A Representation Space Analysis

Towards Understanding Jailbreak Attacks in LLMs: A Representation Space Analysis

Yuping Lin, Pengfei He, Han Xu, Yue Xing, Makoto Yamada, Hui Liu, Jiliang Tang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to a type of attack known as jailbreaking, which misleads LLMs to output harmful contents. Although there are diverse jailbreak attack strategies, there is no unified understanding on why some methods succeed and others fail. This paper explores the behavior of harmful and harmless prompts in the LLM's representation space to investigate the intrinsic properties of successful jailbreak attacks. We hypothesize that successful attacks share some similar properties: They are effective in moving the representation of the harmful prompt towards the direction to the harmless prompts. We leverage hidden representations into the objective of existing jailbreak attacks to move the attacks along the acceptance direction, and conduct experiments to validate the above hypothesis using the proposed objective. We hope this study provides new insights into understanding how LLMs understand harmfulness information.

Read more

6/18/2024

JailbreakLens: Visual Analysis of Jailbreak Attacks Against Large Language Models

JailbreakLens: Visual Analysis of Jailbreak Attacks Against Large Language Models

Yingchaojie Feng, Zhizhang Chen, Zhining Kang, Sijia Wang, Minfeng Zhu, Wei Zhang, Wei Chen

YC

0

Reddit

0

The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has underscored concerns regarding their security vulnerabilities, notably against jailbreak attacks, where adversaries design jailbreak prompts to circumvent safety mechanisms for potential misuse. Addressing these concerns necessitates a comprehensive analysis of jailbreak prompts to evaluate LLMs' defensive capabilities and identify potential weaknesses. However, the complexity of evaluating jailbreak performance and understanding prompt characteristics makes this analysis laborious. We collaborate with domain experts to characterize problems and propose an LLM-assisted framework to streamline the analysis process. It provides automatic jailbreak assessment to facilitate performance evaluation and support analysis of components and keywords in prompts. Based on the framework, we design JailbreakLens, a visual analysis system that enables users to explore the jailbreak performance against the target model, conduct multi-level analysis of prompt characteristics, and refine prompt instances to verify findings. Through a case study, technical evaluations, and expert interviews, we demonstrate our system's effectiveness in helping users evaluate model security and identify model weaknesses.

Read more

4/16/2024