On Subjective Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration in Natural Language Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenge of quantifying and calibrating subjective uncertainty in natural language generation (NLG) models.
- It investigates techniques to assess the reliability and trustworthiness of the uncertainty estimates produced by these models.
- The research aims to improve the transparency and interpretability of NLG systems, which is crucial for their safe and effective deployment.
Plain English Explanation
Natural language generation (NLG) models are AI systems that can produce human-like text, such as summaries, stories, or answers to questions. However, these models don't always know how confident they are in the text they generate. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/generating-confidence-uncertainty-quantification-black-box-large">This can lead to issues if the model's output is used for important decisions without understanding its reliability</a>.
The researchers in this paper looked at ways to quantify and "calibrate" the uncertainty of NLG models. Calibration means ensuring that the model's estimated uncertainty matches the actual accuracy of its predictions. For example, if the model says it's 80% confident in its output, the output should be correct 80% of the time.
By developing better ways to measure and calibrate uncertainty, the researchers aim to make NLG systems more transparent and trustworthy. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/to-believe-or-not-to-believe-your">This is crucial as these models are increasingly used in high-stakes applications like medical diagnosis or financial planning</a>, where it's important to understand the model's limitations and confidence levels.
Technical Explanation
The researchers explored several techniques to quantify and calibrate the subjective uncertainty in NLG models:
-
Uncertainty Quantification: They investigated different metrics, such as <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/uncertainty-language-models-assessment-through-rank-calibration">rank calibration</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/semantic-density-uncertainty-quantification-semantic-space-large">semantic density</a>, to measure the model's uncertainty in its generated text.
-
Uncertainty Calibration: The researchers explored techniques to adjust the model's uncertainty estimates to match the actual accuracy of its predictions. This involved methods like temperature scaling and Platt scaling.
-
Evaluation: The researchers designed experiments to assess the effectiveness of their uncertainty quantification and calibration approaches. They used both automatic metrics and human evaluations to gauge the reliability and interpretability of the models' uncertainty estimates.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough investigation of the challenges in quantifying and calibrating subjective uncertainty in NLG models. The researchers acknowledge that their techniques are not perfect and that further research is needed, especially in <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/epistemic-uncertainty-quantification-pre-trained-neural-network">addressing the epistemic uncertainty</a> (uncertainty about the model's own knowledge) in these systems.
One potential limitation is that the experiments were conducted on a relatively narrow set of NLG tasks and datasets. Expanding the evaluation to a wider range of applications and scenarios could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed methods.
Additionally, the paper focuses on improving the transparency and interpretability of uncertainty estimates, but it does not delve into the potential ethical implications of deploying these calibrated NLG systems in high-stakes decision-making contexts. Further research on the societal impact and responsible use of these technologies would be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper makes important contributions to the field of uncertainty quantification and calibration in natural language generation. By developing techniques to better measure and adjust the subjective uncertainty of NLG models, the researchers are helping to improve the transparency and trustworthiness of these systems.
As NLG models become more widely adopted, especially in safety-critical applications, the ability to understand and communicate their limitations is crucial. The insights from this research can pave the way for more reliable and interpretable natural language generation, with significant implications for the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On Subjective Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration in Natural Language Generation
Ziyu Wang, Chris Holmes
Applications of large language models often involve the generation of free-form responses, in which case uncertainty quantification becomes challenging. This is due to the need to identify task-specific uncertainties (e.g., about the semantics) which appears difficult to define in general cases. This work addresses these challenges from a perspective of Bayesian decision theory, starting from the assumption that our utility is characterized by a similarity measure that compares a generated response with a hypothetical true response. We discuss how this assumption enables principled quantification of the model's subjective uncertainty and its calibration. We further derive a measure for epistemic uncertainty, based on a missing data perspective and its characterization as an excess risk. The proposed measures can be applied to black-box language models. We demonstrate the proposed methods on question answering and machine translation tasks, where they extract broadly meaningful uncertainty estimates from GPT and Gemini models and quantify their calibration.
Read more6/11/2024
💬
0
Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
Large language models (LLMs) specializing in natural language generation (NLG) have recently started exhibiting promising capabilities across a variety of domains. However, gauging the trustworthiness of responses generated by LLMs remains an open challenge, with limited research on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NLG. Furthermore, existing literature typically assumes white-box access to language models, which is becoming unrealistic either due to the closed-source nature of the latest LLMs or computational constraints. In this work, we investigate UQ in NLG for *black-box* LLMs. We first differentiate *uncertainty* vs *confidence*: the former refers to the ``dispersion'' of the potential predictions for a fixed input, and the latter refers to the confidence on a particular prediction/generation. We then propose and compare several confidence/uncertainty measures, applying them to *selective NLG* where unreliable results could either be ignored or yielded for further assessment. Experiments were carried out with several popular LLMs on question-answering datasets (for evaluation purposes). Results reveal that a simple measure for the semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of the quality of LLM responses, providing valuable insights for practitioners on uncertainty management when adopting LLMs. The code to replicate our experiments is available at https://github.com/zlin7/UQ-NLG.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Question Rephrasing for Quantifying Uncertainty in Large Language Models: Applications in Molecular Chemistry Tasks
Zizhang Chen, Pengyu Hong, Sandeep Madireddy
Uncertainty quantification enables users to assess the reliability of responses generated by large language models (LLMs). We present a novel Question Rephrasing technique to evaluate the input uncertainty of LLMs, which refers to the uncertainty arising from equivalent variations of the inputs provided to LLMs. This technique is integrated with sampling methods that measure the output uncertainty of LLMs, thereby offering a more comprehensive uncertainty assessment. We validated our approach on property prediction and reaction prediction for molecular chemistry tasks.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Multi-group Uncertainty Quantification for Long-form Text Generation
Terrance Liu, Zhiwei Steven Wu
While large language models are rapidly moving towards consumer-facing applications, they are often still prone to factual errors and hallucinations. In order to reduce the potential harms that may come from these errors, it is important for users to know to what extent they can trust an LLM when it makes a factual claim. To this end, we study the problem of uncertainty quantification of factual correctness in long-form natural language generation. Given some output from a large language model, we study both uncertainty at the level of individual claims contained within the output (via calibration) and uncertainty across the entire output itself (via conformal prediction). Moreover, we invoke multicalibration and multivalid conformal prediction to ensure that such uncertainty guarantees are valid both marginally and across distinct groups of prompts. Using the task of biography generation, we demonstrate empirically that having access to and making use of additional group attributes for each prompt improves both overall and group-wise performance. As the problems of calibration, conformal prediction, and their multi-group counterparts have not been extensively explored previously in the context of long-form text generation, we consider these empirical results to form a benchmark for this setting.
Read more8/1/2024