Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach to estimating the uncertainty of large language models (LLMs) by shifting the attention mechanism to focus on the relevance of the input.
- The researchers developed a technique called Relevance-Attention (R-Attention) that can be integrated into existing LLM architectures to quantify the uncertainty of model outputs.
- The paper presents experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of R-Attention in improving uncertainty estimation for various natural language tasks compared to existing uncertainty quantification methods.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful at generating human-like text. However, these models can be uncertain or even make mistakes in their outputs, which can be problematic in high-stakes applications. Harnessing the Power of Large Language Model Uncertainty Aware and Uncertainty Quantification in Context Learning for Large Language Models are two other papers that explore ways to quantify the uncertainty of LLMs.
The key insight in this paper is that LLMs can be improved by shifting their attention to focus more on the relevance of the input, rather than just trying to generate the most likely output. The authors developed a technique called Relevance-Attention (R-Attention) that can be integrated into existing LLM architectures to better estimate the uncertainty of the model's predictions.
In simple terms, R-Attention helps the model identify which parts of the input are most important for its output, and then uses that information to provide a measure of how confident the model is in its prediction. This allows the model to be more transparent about its uncertainty, which can be crucial in applications where mistakes could have serious consequences.
The researchers demonstrate through various experiments that R-Attention outperforms other existing methods for quantifying uncertainty in LLMs, particularly for natural language tasks like text classification and question answering. This suggests that shifting attention to relevance could be a promising approach for making LLMs more reliable and trustworthy.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called Relevance-Attention (R-Attention) that aims to improve the uncertainty estimation of large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to shift the attention mechanism of the LLM to focus more on the relevance of the input, rather than just trying to predict the most likely output.
The R-Attention module is designed to be integrated into existing LLM architectures, such as Transformer-based models. It consists of two main components:
-
Relevance Scorer: This component takes the input text and the current hidden state of the LLM and outputs a relevance score for each token in the input. The relevance score represents how important each token is for the model's prediction.
-
Relevance-Weighted Attention: The standard attention mechanism is modified to use the relevance scores as weights, so that the model pays more attention to the most relevant parts of the input when generating the output.
The researchers evaluate the R-Attention approach on various natural language tasks, including text classification, question answering, and natural language inference. They compare the performance of LLMs with and without the R-Attention module, as well as with other existing uncertainty quantification methods like LUQ and SDUQ.
The results show that the R-Attention module consistently improves the uncertainty estimation of the LLMs across the different tasks, outperforming the baseline models and other uncertainty quantification techniques. The authors also provide analyses to understand the behavior and inner workings of the R-Attention mechanism.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to improving the uncertainty estimation of large language models. The key strengths of the work include:
-
Relevance-Focused Attention: The idea of shifting the attention mechanism to focus on the relevance of the input is a novel and promising approach. It aligns with the intuition that understanding which parts of the input are most important for the model's prediction can lead to better uncertainty estimation.
-
Comprehensive Evaluation: The researchers have conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the R-Attention approach across a range of natural language tasks, demonstrating its consistent performance improvements over existing methods.
-
Interpretability: The paper includes detailed analyses of the R-Attention mechanism, providing insights into how it works and why it is effective, which can be valuable for further research and development.
However, the paper also has a few potential limitations:
-
Generalization to Other Domains: The experiments in the paper focus on natural language tasks, and it would be interesting to see how the R-Attention approach performs on other domains, such as image or multimodal tasks.
-
Real-World Deployment: While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of R-Attention in controlled experiments, further research may be needed to understand how it would perform in real-world, high-stakes applications where uncertainty estimation is critical.
-
Computational Overhead: The addition of the R-Attention module may come with some computational overhead, and the researchers could explore ways to optimize its implementation for efficient deployment.
Overall, this paper presents a compelling and well-executed approach to improving the uncertainty estimation of large language models, and the insights and techniques developed here could have significant implications for the safe and reliable deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel technique called Relevance-Attention (R-Attention) that aims to improve the uncertainty estimation of large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to shift the attention mechanism of the LLM to focus more on the relevance of the input, rather than just trying to predict the most likely output.
The R-Attention module integrates seamlessly with existing LLM architectures and has been shown to consistently outperform other uncertainty quantification methods across a range of natural language tasks. The paper's comprehensive evaluation and detailed analyses provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and inner workings of the R-Attention approach.
While the paper focuses on natural language applications, the principles and techniques developed here could potentially be extended to other domains, such as image or multimodal tasks, where uncertainty estimation is critical for the safe and reliable deployment of large AI models. Further research on optimizing the computational efficiency of R-Attention and exploring its performance in real-world, high-stakes applications would be valuable next steps.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the growing body of research on uncertainty quantification for large language models, which is crucial for enhancing the trustworthiness and transparency of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Models
Jinhao Duan, Hao Cheng, Shiqi Wang, Alex Zavalny, Chenan Wang, Renjing Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Kaidi Xu
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promising results in language generation and instruction following but frequently hallucinate, making their outputs less reliable. Despite Uncertainty Quantification's (UQ) potential solutions, implementing it accurately within LLMs is challenging. Our research introduces a simple heuristic: not all tokens in auto-regressive LLM text equally represent the underlying meaning, as linguistic redundancy often allows a few keywords to convey the essence of long sentences. However, current methods underestimate this inequality when assessing uncertainty, causing tokens with limited semantics to be equally or excessively weighted in UQ. To correct this, we propose Shifting Attention to more Relevant (SAR) components at both token- and sentence-levels for better UQ. We conduct extensive experiments involving a range of popular off-the-shelf LLMs, such as Vicuna, WizardLM, and LLaMA-2-chat, with model sizes extending up to 33B parameters. We evaluate various free-form question-answering tasks, encompassing domains such as reading comprehension, science Q&A, and medical Q&A. Our experimental results, coupled with a comprehensive demographic analysis, demonstrate the superior performance of SAR. The code is available at https://github.com/jinhaoduan/SAR.
Read more5/30/2024
🔍
0
LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs
Caiqi Zhang, Fangyu Liu, Marco Basaldella, Nigel Collier
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in a variety of NLP tasks. However, LLMs are also prone to generate nonfactual content. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is pivotal in enhancing our understanding of a model's confidence on its generation, thereby aiding in the mitigation of nonfactual outputs. Existing research on UQ predominantly targets short text generation, typically yielding brief, word-limited responses. However, real-world applications frequently necessitate much longer responses. Our study first highlights the limitations of current UQ methods in handling long text generation. We then introduce textsc{Luq} and its two variations, a series of novel sampling-based UQ approaches specifically designed for long text. Our findings reveal that textsc{Luq} outperforms existing baseline methods in correlating with the model's factuality scores (negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro). To further improve the factuality of LLM responses, we propose textsc{Luq-Ensemble}, a method that ensembles responses from multiple models and selects the response with the lowest uncertainty. The ensembling method greatly improves the response factuality upon the best standalone LLM.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Unconditional Truthfulness: Learning Conditional Dependency for Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models
Artem Vazhentsev, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Rui Xing, Alexander Panchenko, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin, Maxim Panov, Artem Shelmanov
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a perspective approach to detecting Large Language Model (LLM) hallucinations and low quality output. In this work, we address one of the challenges of UQ in generation tasks that arises from the conditional dependency between the generation steps of an LLM. We propose to learn this dependency from data. We train a regression model, which target variable is the gap between the conditional and the unconditional generation confidence. During LLM inference, we use this learned conditional dependency model to modulate the uncertainty of the current generation step based on the uncertainty of the previous step. Our experimental evaluation on nine datasets and three LLMs shows that the proposed method is highly effective for uncertainty quantification, achieving substantial improvements over rivaling approaches.
Read more8/21/2024
💬
0
Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
Large language models (LLMs) specializing in natural language generation (NLG) have recently started exhibiting promising capabilities across a variety of domains. However, gauging the trustworthiness of responses generated by LLMs remains an open challenge, with limited research on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NLG. Furthermore, existing literature typically assumes white-box access to language models, which is becoming unrealistic either due to the closed-source nature of the latest LLMs or computational constraints. In this work, we investigate UQ in NLG for *black-box* LLMs. We first differentiate *uncertainty* vs *confidence*: the former refers to the ``dispersion'' of the potential predictions for a fixed input, and the latter refers to the confidence on a particular prediction/generation. We then propose and compare several confidence/uncertainty measures, applying them to *selective NLG* where unreliable results could either be ignored or yielded for further assessment. Experiments were carried out with several popular LLMs on question-answering datasets (for evaluation purposes). Results reveal that a simple measure for the semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of the quality of LLM responses, providing valuable insights for practitioners on uncertainty management when adopting LLMs. The code to replicate our experiments is available at https://github.com/zlin7/UQ-NLG.
Read more5/21/2024