Semantically-correlated memories in a dense associative model

2404.07123

YC

0

Reddit

6

Published 4/12/2024 by Thomas F Burns
Semantically-correlated memories in a dense associative model

Abstract

I introduce a novel associative memory model named Correlated Dense Associative Memory (CDAM), which integrates both auto- and hetero-association in a unified framework for continuous-valued memory patterns. Employing an arbitrary graph structure to semantically link memory patterns, CDAM is theoretically and numerically analysed, revealing four distinct dynamical modes: auto-association, narrow hetero-association, wide hetero-association, and neutral quiescence. Drawing inspiration from inhibitory modulation studies, I employ anti-Hebbian learning rules to control the range of hetero-association, extract multi-scale representations of community structures in graphs, and stabilise the recall of temporal sequences. Experimental demonstrations showcase CDAM's efficacy in handling real-world data, replicating a classical neuroscience experiment, performing image retrieval, and simulating arbitrary finite automata.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper examines the neuroscience behind Transformer models, a type of deep learning architecture that has become widely used in natural language processing and other domains.
  • The authors investigate the similarities and differences between the attention mechanisms in Transformers and the biological attention processes observed in the human brain.
  • They explore how the architectural design of Transformers may be inspired by or reflect aspects of neural information processing in the brain.

Plain English Explanation

Transformer models are a type of artificial intelligence [AI] that have become very popular in recent years, especially for tasks like understanding and generating human language. These models are inspired by how the human brain processes information and pays attention to different parts of a problem.

The authors of this paper wanted to dig deeper into the connections between Transformer models and the way the brain works. They looked at the attention mechanisms used in Transformers and compared them to the attention processes that happen in the human brain. By understanding these parallels, the researchers hope to gain insights that can help improve the design and capabilities of Transformer models, as well as our overall understanding of how the brain computes and solves problems.

The paper explores the similarities and differences between the attention mechanisms in Transformers and the biological attention processes observed in the brain. It examines how the architectural design of Transformers may be influenced by or reflect certain aspects of neural information processing. This can lead to better AI systems that are more aligned with human intelligence and potentially even provide clues about how our own brains work.

Technical Explanation

The authors of this paper investigate the connections between the attention mechanisms used in Transformer models and the attention processes observed in the human brain. Transformer models, which have become widely adopted in natural language processing and other domains, rely on an attention mechanism that allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the input when making predictions.

The paper explores how the architectural design of Transformers, including the use of multi-head attention, may be inspired by or reflect aspects of neural information processing in the brain. The researchers analyze the similarities and differences between the computational principles underlying attention in Transformers and the biological mechanisms of attention in the human brain.

By drawing these parallels, the authors hope to gain insights that can lead to improvements in the design and capabilities of Transformer models, as well as a better understanding of the neural basis of attention and information processing in the brain. The paper provides a detailed technical analysis of the neuroscientific underpinnings of Transformer architectures.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-researched examination of the connections between Transformer models and the neuroscience of attention. The authors make a compelling case for the potential insights that can be gained by exploring these parallels, both for advancing AI systems and for enhancing our understanding of human cognition.

However, the paper also acknowledges several caveats and limitations in the current state of research. For example, the authors note that the attention mechanisms in Transformers are still relatively simple compared to the complex, multi-faceted attention processes observed in the brain. Additionally, the paper highlights the need for further empirical studies to validate the proposed connections and to investigate potential misalignments between artificial and biological attention.

While the paper offers valuable insights, it also raises important questions that warrant further investigation. For instance, the authors do not fully address how the architectural choices in Transformers may be influenced by other factors beyond neuroscientific principles, such as computational efficiency or engineering constraints. Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more critical examination of the limitations of using Transformer models as analogies for the brain, and the potential risks of overstating the connections between the two.

Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the emerging field of neuroscience of deep learning, and it provides a solid foundation for future research in this area. By encouraging a more nuanced and critical understanding of the relationships between artificial and biological attention, the authors pave the way for advancements in both AI and neuroscience.

Conclusion

This paper explores the neuroscience behind Transformer models, a type of deep learning architecture that has become widely used in natural language processing and other domains. The authors investigate the similarities and differences between the attention mechanisms in Transformers and the biological attention processes observed in the human brain.

By drawing these parallels, the researchers hope to gain insights that can lead to improvements in the design and capabilities of Transformer models, as well as a better understanding of the neural basis of attention and information processing in the brain. The paper provides a detailed technical analysis of the neuroscientific underpinnings of Transformer architectures and highlights the potential for cross-pollination between AI and neuroscience.

While the paper acknowledges several caveats and limitations, it makes a significant contribution to the emerging field of neuroscience of deep learning and paves the way for future research that can further elucidate the connections between artificial and biological attention processes. By fostering a more nuanced understanding of these relationships, the authors hope to drive advancements in both AI and our understanding of the human brain.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🧠

A Generic Shared Attention Mechanism for Various Backbone Neural Networks

Zhongzhan Huang, Senwei Liang, Mingfu Liang, Liang Lin

YC

0

Reddit

0

The self-attention mechanism has emerged as a critical component for improving the performance of various backbone neural networks. However, current mainstream approaches individually incorporate newly designed self-attention modules (SAMs) into each layer of the network for granted without fully exploiting their parameters' potential. This leads to suboptimal performance and increased parameter consumption as the network depth increases. To improve this paradigm, in this paper, we first present a counterintuitive but inherent phenomenon: SAMs tend to produce strongly correlated attention maps across different layers, with an average Pearson correlation coefficient of up to 0.85. Inspired by this inherent observation, we propose Dense-and-Implicit Attention (DIA), which directly shares SAMs across layers and employs a long short-term memory module to calibrate and bridge the highly correlated attention maps of different layers, thus improving the parameter utilization efficiency of SAMs. This design of DIA is also consistent with the neural network's dynamical system perspective. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our simple yet effective DIA can consistently enhance various network backbones, including ResNet, Transformer, and UNet, across tasks such as image classification, object detection, and image generation using diffusion models.

Read more

4/11/2024

Memory Mosaics

Memory Mosaics

Jianyu Zhang, Niklas Nolte, Ranajoy Sadhukhan, Beidi Chen, L'eon Bottou

YC

0

Reddit

0

Memory Mosaics are networks of associative memories working in concert to achieve a prediction task of interest. Like transformers, memory mosaics possess compositional capabilities and in-context learning capabilities. Unlike transformers, memory mosaics achieve these capabilities in comparatively transparent ways. We demonstrate these capabilities on toy examples and we also show that memory mosaics perform as well or better than transformers on medium-scale language modeling tasks.

Read more

5/15/2024

Do You Remember? Dense Video Captioning with Cross-Modal Memory Retrieval

Do You Remember? Dense Video Captioning with Cross-Modal Memory Retrieval

Minkuk Kim, Hyeon Bae Kim, Jinyoung Moon, Jinwoo Choi, Seong Tae Kim

YC

0

Reddit

0

There has been significant attention to the research on dense video captioning, which aims to automatically localize and caption all events within untrimmed video. Several studies introduce methods by designing dense video captioning as a multitasking problem of event localization and event captioning to consider inter-task relations. However, addressing both tasks using only visual input is challenging due to the lack of semantic content. In this study, we address this by proposing a novel framework inspired by the cognitive information processing of humans. Our model utilizes external memory to incorporate prior knowledge. The memory retrieval method is proposed with cross-modal video-to-text matching. To effectively incorporate retrieved text features, the versatile encoder and the decoder with visual and textual cross-attention modules are designed. Comparative experiments have been conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposed method on ActivityNet Captions and YouCook2 datasets. Experimental results show promising performance of our model without extensive pretraining from a large video dataset.

Read more

4/12/2024

🧠

Assembling Modular, Hierarchical Cognitive Map Learners with Hyperdimensional Computing

Nathan McDonald, Anthony Dematteo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Cognitive map learners (CML) are a collection of separate yet collaboratively trained single-layer artificial neural networks (matrices), which navigate an abstract graph by learning internal representations of the node states, edge actions, and edge action availabilities. A consequence of this atypical segregation of information is that the CML performs near-optimal path planning between any two graph node states. However, the CML does not learn when or why to transition from one node to another. This work created CMLs with node states expressed as high dimensional vectors consistent with hyperdimensional computing (HDC), a form of symbolic machine learning (ML). This work evaluated HDC-based CMLs as ML modules, capable of receiving external inputs and computing output responses which are semantically meaningful for other HDC-based modules. Several CMLs were prepared independently then repurposed to solve the Tower of Hanoi puzzle without retraining these CMLs and without explicit reference to their respective graph topologies. This work suggests a template for building levels of biologically plausible cognitive abstraction and orchestration.

Read more

5/1/2024