Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Models

2405.00402

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/2/2024 by Leonardo Ranaldi, Andr`e Freitas
Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Models

Abstract

The alignments of reasoning abilities between smaller and larger Language Models are largely conducted via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) using demonstrations generated from robust Large Language Models (LLMs). Although these approaches deliver more performant models, they do not show sufficiently strong generalization ability as the training only relies on the provided demonstrations. In this paper, we propose the Self-refine Instruction-tuning method that elicits Smaller Language Models to self-refine their abilities. Our approach is based on a two-stage process, where reasoning abilities are first transferred between LLMs and Small Language Models (SLMs) via Instruction-tuning on demonstrations provided by LLMs, and then the instructed models Self-refine their abilities through preference optimization strategies. In particular, the second phase operates refinement heuristics based on the Direct Preference Optimization algorithm, where the SLMs are elicited to deliver a series of reasoning paths by automatically sampling the generated responses and providing rewards using ground truths from the LLMs. Results obtained on commonsense and math reasoning tasks show that this approach significantly outperforms Instruction-tuning in both in-domain and out-domain scenarios, aligning the reasoning abilities of Smaller and Larger Language Models.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper proposes a method called "Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning" to improve the reasoning abilities of large language models.
  • The key idea is to fine-tune the model on a dataset of instructions and their associated reasoning steps, and then have the model refine its own reasoning process through self-evaluation and iterative refinement.
  • The goal is to develop language models that can better understand and follow complex instructions while also explaining their reasoning in a more transparent and aligned way.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers are trying to create language models that can not only understand and follow complex instructions, but also explain their reasoning in a clear and transparent way. They call their approach "Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning".

The basic idea is to first train the language model on a dataset of instructions and the associated reasoning steps needed to complete those instructions. This helps the model learn how to break down and understand complicated tasks.

But the key innovation is the "self-refine" part. After this initial training, the model is then asked to evaluate its own reasoning process and iteratively refine it. So the model is essentially learning to "think about its own thinking" and improve its reasoning abilities over time.

This is important because it can help make the model's decision-making more transparent and aligned with what a human would consider "reasonable" or "logical" reasoning. Rather than just outputting an answer, the model can explain how it arrived at that conclusion.

The researchers believe this type of "self-refining" capability could be very valuable for building AI systems that can reliably follow complex instructions and explain their actions in a way that builds trust and understanding with human users. It represents an important step towards more "aligned" and interpretable AI models.

Technical Explanation

The core of the "Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning" method is a multi-stage fine-tuning process:

  1. Instruction-Tuning: The base language model is first fine-tuned on a dataset of instructions and their associated reasoning steps. This helps the model learn how to break down and understand complex tasks.

  2. Self-Refine: After the initial instruction-tuning, the model is then asked to evaluate its own reasoning process for a given instruction and iteratively refine its response. This self-evaluation and refinement allows the model to improve its reasoning abilities over time.

  3. Alignment Objectives: The researchers incorporate various "alignment" objectives during the self-refine stage, such as maximizing the coherence and faithfulness of the model's reasoning, in order to make its decision-making more transparent and aligned with human-like logic.

The authors test this approach on a range of instruction-following and reasoning benchmarks, and find that models trained with the "Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning" method significantly outperform standard instruction-tuned models in terms of task performance and the quality/interpretability of their reasoning.

Importantly, the self-refine process allows the model to go beyond just outputting answers, and instead provide step-by-step explanations of its reasoning. This addresses a key limitation of many current language models.

Critical Analysis

The "Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning" approach represents an important advance in efforts to build more "aligned" and interpretable language models. The ability for models to self-evaluate and iteratively refine their reasoning is a promising direction for imbuing AI systems with greater transparency and human-like logic.

However, the paper does not fully address some key challenges and potential limitations of this approach:

  • The self-refine process relies on carefully designed "alignment objectives" to shape the model's reasoning. Determining the right set of objectives, and ensuring they truly capture "human-aligned" reasoning, is a significant challenge.
  • The success of the self-refine process may be highly dependent on the quality and coverage of the initial instruction-tuning dataset. Gaps or biases in the training data could undermine the model's ability to reason reliably.
  • Scaling the self-refine process to more complex, open-ended reasoning tasks remains an open question. The experiments in the paper focus on relatively constrained, step-by-step instructions.

Further research is needed to address these challenges and fully realize the potential of "self-refining" language models. But this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to develop AI systems that can reliably understand and explain their reasoning in a way that builds trust and accountability.

Conclusion

The "Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning" method proposed in this paper is a significant advancement in efforts to create more "aligned" and interpretable language models. By fine-tuning models on instruction-following tasks and then having them iteratively refine their own reasoning, the approach aims to develop AI systems that can not only complete complex tasks, but also explain their decision-making in a transparent and human-understandable way.

While the paper does not fully resolve all the challenges in this area, it represents an important step forward. Continued research on self-evaluation, reasoning alignment, and scaling transparent decision-making to more open-ended domains will be crucial for building AI assistants that can reliably follow instructions, explain their actions, and earn the trust of human users. The insights and techniques introduced in this work are likely to have a significant impact on the future development of advanced language models and AI systems more broadly.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve by Learning from Language Feedback

New!Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve by Learning from Language Feedback

Chi Hu, Yimin Hu, Hang Cao, Tong Xiao, Jingbo Zhu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intentions and values is crucial yet challenging. Current methods primarily rely on human preferences, which are costly and insufficient in capturing nuanced feedback expressed in natural language. In this paper, we present Self-Refinement Tuning (SRT), a method that leverages model feedback for alignment, thereby reducing reliance on human annotations. SRT uses a base language model (e.g., Tulu2) to generate initial responses, which are critiqued and refined by a more advanced model (e.g., GPT-4-Turbo). This process enables the base model to self-evaluate and improve its outputs, facilitating continuous learning. SRT further optimizes the model by learning from its self-generated feedback and refinements, creating a feedback loop that promotes model improvement. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that SRT significantly outperforms strong baselines across diverse tasks and model sizes. When applied to a 70B parameter model, SRT increases the win rate from 9.6% to 25.8% on the AlpacaEval 2.0 benchmark, surpassing well-established systems such as GPT-4-0314, Claude 2, and Gemini. Our analysis highlights the crucial role of language feedback in the success of SRT, suggesting potential for further exploration in this direction.

Read more

6/12/2024

šŸ’¬

Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision

Yongqi Tong, Sizhe Wang, Dawei Li, Yifan Wang, Simeng Han, Zi Lin, Chengsong Huang, Jiaxin Huang, Jingbo Shang

YC

0

Reddit

0

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in handling complex queries, much of the past work has depended on extensively annotated datasets by human experts. However, this reliance on fully-supervised annotations poses scalability challenges, particularly as models and data requirements grow. To mitigate this, we explore the potential of enhancing LLMs' reasoning abilities with minimal human supervision. In this work, we introduce self-reinforcement, which begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of the model using a small collection of annotated questions. Then it iteratively improves LLMs by learning from the differences in responses from the SFT and unfinetuned models on unlabeled questions. Our approach provides an efficient approach without relying heavily on extensive human-annotated explanations. However, current reasoning benchmarks typically only include golden-reference answers or rationales. Therefore, we present textsc{PuzzleBen}, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales across various domains, such as brainteasers, puzzles, riddles, parajumbles, and critical reasoning tasks. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities. Our experiments underscore the significance of textsc{PuzzleBen}, as well as the effectiveness of our methodology as a promising direction in future endeavors. Our dataset and code will be published soon on texttt{Anonymity Link}.

Read more

5/8/2024

Self-Explore to Avoid the Pit: Improving the Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Fine-grained Rewards

Self-Explore to Avoid the Pit: Improving the Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Fine-grained Rewards

Hyeonbin Hwang, Doyoung Kim, Seungone Kim, Seonghyeon Ye, Minjoon Seo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Training on large amounts of rationales (i.e., CoT Fine-tuning) is effective at improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, acquiring human-authored rationales or augmenting rationales from proprietary models is costly and not scalable. In this paper, we study the problem of whether LLMs could self-improve their reasoning capabilities. To this end, we propose Self-Explore, where the LLM is tasked to explore the first wrong step (i.e., the first pit) within the rationale and use such signals as fine-grained rewards for further improvement. On the GSM8K and MATH test set, Self-Explore achieves 11.57% and 2.89% improvement on average across three LLMs compared to supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Our code is available at https://github.com/hbin0701/Self-Explore.

Read more

5/17/2024

Self-Tuning: Instructing LLMs to Effectively Acquire New Knowledge through Self-Teaching

Self-Tuning: Instructing LLMs to Effectively Acquire New Knowledge through Self-Teaching

Xiaoying Zhang, Baolin Peng, Ye Tian, Jingyan Zhou, Yipeng Zhang, Haitao Mi, Helen Meng

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) often struggle to provide up-to-date information due to their one-time training and the constantly evolving nature of the world. To keep LLMs current, existing approaches typically involve continued pre-training on new documents. However, they frequently face difficulties in extracting stored knowledge. Motivated by the remarkable success of the Feynman Technique in efficient human learning, we introduce Self-Tuning, a learning framework aimed at improving an LLM's ability to effectively acquire new knowledge from raw documents through self-teaching. Specifically, we develop a Self-Teaching strategy that augments the documents with a set of knowledge-intensive tasks created in a self-supervised manner, focusing on three crucial aspects: memorization, comprehension, and self-reflection. Additionally, we introduce three Wiki-Newpages-2023-QA datasets to facilitate an in-depth analysis of an LLM's knowledge acquisition ability concerning memorization, extraction, and reasoning. Extensive experimental results on Llama2 family models reveal that Self-Tuning consistently exhibits superior performance across all knowledge acquisition tasks and excels in preserving previous knowledge.

Read more

6/12/2024