Principled RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper proposes a new approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) that addresses challenges with heterogeneous feedback and individual preferences.
- The key ideas are to personalize the learning process for each user and aggregate feedback from multiple users to learn a shared preference model.
- The authors conduct experiments to evaluate their approach and compare it to existing RLHF methods.
Plain English Explanation
This paper focuses on a technique called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which is used to train AI systems by having humans provide feedback on the system's actions. The authors recognized that existing RLHF approaches have some limitations, such as not accounting for the fact that different people may have different preferences or ways of providing feedback.
To address this, the researchers developed a new RLHF method that personalizes the learning process for each individual user and also aggregates the feedback from multiple users to learn a shared preference model. The idea is that by understanding each user's unique preferences and combining feedback from many users, the AI system can learn to behave in a way that satisfies a wider range of people.
The researchers tested their new approach in experiments and compared it to other existing RLHF methods. Their results suggest that this personalized and aggregated approach can lead to better performance and more robust learning compared to previous techniques.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of this paper are:
-
Personalized RLHF: The authors develop a method to personalize the RLHF process for each individual user, modeling their unique preferences and feedback patterns.
-
Preference Aggregation: They also introduce a technique to aggregate feedback from multiple users to learn a shared preference model, allowing the AI system to balance the needs and desires of a diverse user base.
-
Experimental Evaluation: The authors conduct experiments to assess the performance of their personalized and aggregated RLHF approach, comparing it to existing methods on a range of tasks.
The personalized RLHF component uses Bayesian inference to model each user's preferences, while the preference aggregation builds on techniques from social choice theory to combine the feedback signals. The experiments demonstrate that this principled approach can outperform standard RLHF methods, particularly in scenarios with heterogeneous user preferences.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-reasoned and technically sound approach to addressing some of the key challenges in RLHF. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The personalization and aggregation techniques rely on strong assumptions about the structure of user preferences and the feedback process. In practice, these assumptions may not always hold, and the performance could be sensitive to violations.
- The experiments are conducted in relatively simple, synthetic environments. More research is needed to understand how well the approach scales to real-world, complex scenarios with noisy and ambiguous human feedback.
- The paper does not address the potential ethical and societal implications of developing more powerful RLHF systems, such as concerns around fairness, transparency, and the broader impacts on human-AI interaction.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the field of RLHF, but continued work is needed to fully realize the potential of this approach and address its limitations.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel RLHF method that personalizes the learning process for each user and aggregates feedback from multiple users to learn a shared preference model. The key innovations are the personalization and preference aggregation components, which allow the AI system to better account for heterogeneous user feedback and individual differences in preferences.
The experimental results suggest that this principled approach can outperform existing RLHF techniques, particularly in scenarios with diverse user preferences. While the paper identifies some potential limitations, it represents an important step forward in developing more robust and effective RLHF systems. As the use of AI systems in high-stakes applications continues to grow, techniques like the one presented here will become increasingly crucial for ensuring these systems behave in alignment with human values and preferences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Principled RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregation
Chanwoo Park, Mingyang Liu, Dingwen Kong, Kaiqing Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has been an effective technique for aligning AI systems with human values, with remarkable successes in fine-tuning large-language models recently. Most existing RLHF paradigms make the underlying assumption that human preferences are relatively homogeneous, and can be encoded by a single reward model. In this paper, we focus on addressing the issues due to the inherent heterogeneity in human preferences, as well as their potential strategic behavior in providing feedback. Specifically, we propose two frameworks to address heterogeneous human feedback in principled ways: personalization-based one and aggregation-based one. For the former, we propose two approaches based on representation learning and clustering, respectively, for learning multiple reward models that trades off the bias (due to preference heterogeneity) and variance (due to the use of fewer data for learning each model by personalization). We then establish sample complexity guarantees for both approaches. For the latter, we aim to adhere to the single-model framework, as already deployed in the current RLHF paradigm, by carefully aggregating diverse and truthful preferences from humans. We propose two approaches based on reward and preference aggregation, respectively: the former utilizes both utilitarianism and Leximin approaches to aggregate individual reward models, with sample complexity guarantees; the latter directly aggregates the human feedback in the form of probabilistic opinions. Under the probabilistic-opinion-feedback model, we also develop an approach to handle strategic human labelers who may bias and manipulate the aggregated preferences with untruthful feedback. Based on the ideas in mechanism design, our approach ensures truthful preference reporting, with the induced aggregation rule maximizing social welfare functions.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
Sriyash Poddar, Yanming Wan, Hamish Ivison, Abhishek Gupta, Natasha Jaques
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a powerful paradigm for aligning foundation models to human values and preferences. However, current RLHF techniques cannot account for the naturally occurring differences in individual human preferences across a diverse population. When these differences arise, traditional RLHF frameworks simply average over them, leading to inaccurate rewards and poor performance for individual subgroups. To address the need for pluralistic alignment, we develop a class of multimodal RLHF methods. Our proposed techniques are based on a latent variable formulation - inferring a novel user-specific latent and learning reward models and policies conditioned on this latent without additional user-specific data. While conceptually simple, we show that in practice, this reward modeling requires careful algorithmic considerations around model architecture and reward scaling. To empirically validate our proposed technique, we first show that it can provide a way to combat underspecification in simulated control problems, inferring and optimizing user-specific reward functions. Next, we conduct experiments on pluralistic language datasets representing diverse user preferences and demonstrate improved reward function accuracy. We additionally show the benefits of this probabilistic framework in terms of measuring uncertainty, and actively learning user preferences. This work enables learning from diverse populations of users with divergent preferences, an important challenge that naturally occurs in problems from robot learning to foundation model alignment.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
Ilgee Hong, Zichong Li, Alexander Bukharin, Yixiao Li, Haoming Jiang, Tianbao Yang, Tuo Zhao
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a prevalent approach to align AI systems with human values by learning rewards from human preference data. Due to various reasons, however, such data typically takes the form of rankings over pairs of trajectory segments, which fails to capture the varying strengths of preferences across different pairs. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive preference loss, underpinned by distributionally robust optimization (DRO), designed to address this uncertainty in preference strength. By incorporating an adaptive scaling parameter into the loss for each pair, our method increases the flexibility of the reward function. Specifically, it assigns small scaling parameters to pairs with ambiguous preferences, leading to more comparable rewards, and large scaling parameters to those with clear preferences for more distinct rewards. Computationally, our proposed loss function is strictly convex and univariate with respect to each scaling parameter, enabling its efficient optimization through a simple second-order algorithm. Our method is versatile and can be readily adapted to various preference optimization frameworks, including direct preference optimization (DPO). Our experiments with robotic control and natural language generation with large language models (LLMs) show that our method not only improves policy performance but also aligns reward function selection more closely with policy optimization, simplifying the hyperparameter tuning process.
Read more6/6/2024
🏅
0
Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback
Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, R'emi Munos
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.
Read more5/24/2024