Replacing Cryptopuzzles with Useful Computation in Blockchain Proof-of-Work Protocols

2404.15735

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/15/2024 by Andrea Merlina, Thiago Garrett, Roman Vitenberg

📈

Abstract

Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains have emerged as a robust and effective consensus mechanism in open environments, leading to widespread deployment with numerous cryptocurrency platforms and substantial investments. However, the commonly deployed PoW implementations are all based on solving cryptographic puzzles. Researchers have been pursuing the compelling idea of replacing cryptopuzzles with useful computing tasks for over a decade, in face of the substantial computational capacity of blockchain networks and the global pursuit of a more sustainable IT infrastructure. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the prerequisites for alternative classes of tasks. We provide insight into the effect of introducing usefulness and of transitioning to task classes other than cryptopuzzles. Having distilled the prerequisites, we use them to examine proposed designs from existing literature. Finally, we discuss pertinent techniques and present research gaps in the current state-of-the-art.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains have become a widely adopted consensus mechanism in open internet environments, powering numerous cryptocurrency platforms
  • Current PoW implementations primarily focus on validating the discovery of a winning nonce, which is an intensive computational task
  • Exploring the idea of replacing cryptographic puzzles with useful computing tasks is compelling, given the substantial computational capacity of blockchain networks and the push for a more sustainable IT infrastructure

Plain English Explanation

Blockchains are digital ledgers that record transactions in a secure and decentralized way. The Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism is commonly used to validate transactions and add new blocks to the blockchain. In a PoW system, computers on the network compete to solve complex mathematical puzzles, and the first to find the solution gets to add the next block.

This PoW system has been effective in open internet environments, leading to the widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies and significant investments in the technology. However, the current PoW implementation mainly focuses on verifying the discovery of a special number called a "nonce," which is an extremely computationally intensive task.

Researchers are now exploring the idea of replacing these cryptographic puzzles with "useful" computing tasks that can contribute to other important problems, like scientific research or sustainability efforts. This is appealing because blockchain networks have a massive amount of computing power that could be harnessed for more productive purposes, rather than just solving puzzles.

Technical Explanation

The paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of the requirements and constraints for alternative classes of tasks that could replace the traditional PoW cryptographic puzzles. The authors examine proposed designs from existing literature, distilling relevant techniques and addressing gaps in the current state-of-the-art.

The researchers explore ways to utilize the substantial computational capacity of blockchain networks for more useful computing tasks, beyond just validating nonce discoveries. They investigate the prerequisites and design considerations for alternative consensus mechanisms that could leverage this computational power for productive purposes, such as scientific research or sustainability initiatives.

The paper provides valuable insights into the evolution of consensus mechanisms beyond traditional PoW, highlighting potential approaches and addressing current limitations in the existing literature.

Critical Analysis

The paper thoroughly explores the idea of replacing PoW cryptographic puzzles with useful computing tasks, but it acknowledges that there are significant challenges and constraints to overcome. Some of the key issues mentioned include ensuring the tasks are genuinely useful, maintaining the security and integrity of the blockchain, and incentivizing participants to contribute their computing power.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive solution or a detailed design for a new consensus mechanism. It primarily focuses on outlining the prerequisites and design considerations, leaving the development of such a system to future research.

While the concept of leveraging blockchain computational power for productive tasks is compelling, there are potential risks and trade-offs that would need to be carefully evaluated. For example, the feasibility and scalability of integrating complex scientific computations or sustainability initiatives into the consensus process may be limited.

Overall, the paper provides a valuable exploration of this emerging research direction, but further work is needed to address the practical challenges and develop viable alternatives to traditional PoW that can balance usability, security, and sustainability.

Conclusion

This research paper examines the potential for replacing the traditional Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism in blockchains with alternative approaches that can harness the substantial computational capacity of these networks for more productive purposes.

The authors highlight the widespread adoption of PoW-based cryptocurrencies and the desire to develop a more sustainable IT infrastructure. By exploring the prerequisites and design considerations for alternative consensus mechanisms, the paper offers insights into the evolution of blockchain technology beyond the current PoW model.

While the concept of leveraging blockchain computing power for useful tasks is compelling, the paper acknowledges the significant challenges that need to be overcome. Ongoing research and development will be essential to address the practical limitations and create viable alternatives that can balance the competing priorities of security, usability, and sustainability.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security

Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security

Zishuo Zhao, Zhixuan Fang, Xuechao Wang, Xi Chen, Yuan Zhou

YC

0

Reddit

0

Most concurrent blockchain systems rely heavily on the Proof-of-Work (PoW) or Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanisms for decentralized consensus and security assurance. However, the substantial energy expenditure stemming from computationally intensive yet meaningless tasks has raised considerable concerns surrounding traditional PoW approaches, The PoS mechanism, while free of energy consumption, is subject to security and economic issues. Addressing these issues, the paradigm of Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW) seeks to employ challenges of practical significance as PoW, thereby imbuing energy consumption with tangible value. While previous efforts in Proof of Learning (PoL) explored the utilization of deep learning model training SGD tasks as PoUW challenges, recent research has revealed its vulnerabilities to adversarial attacks and the theoretical hardness in crafting a byzantine-secure PoL mechanism. In this paper, we introduce the concept of incentive-security that incentivizes rational provers to behave honestly for their best interest, bypassing the existing hardness to design a PoL mechanism with computational efficiency, a provable incentive-security guarantee and controllable difficulty. Particularly, our work is secure against two attacks to the recent work of Jia et al. [2021], and also improves the computational overhead from $Theta(1)$ to $O(frac{log E}{E})$. Furthermore, while most recent research assumes trusted problem providers and verifiers, our design also guarantees frontend incentive-security even when problem providers are untrusted, and verifier incentive-security that bypasses the Verifier's Dilemma. By incorporating ML training into blockchain consensus mechanisms with provable guarantees, our research not only proposes an eco-friendly solution to blockchain systems, but also provides a proposal for a completely decentralized computing power market in the new AI age.

Read more

6/6/2024

A Dual-functional Blockchain Framework for Solving Distributed Optimization

A Dual-functional Blockchain Framework for Solving Distributed Optimization

Weihang Cao, Xintong Ling, Jiaheng Wang, Xiqi Gao, Zhi Ding

YC

0

Reddit

0

Proof of Work (PoW) has been extensively utilized as the foundation of blockchain's security, consistency, and tamper-resistance. However, long has it been criticized for its tremendous and inefficient utilization of computational power and energy. In this work, we design a dual-functional blockchain framework that uses solving optimization problems to reach consensus as an alternative to PoW, channeling wasted resources into useful work. We model and analyze our framework by developing discrete Markov chains, and derive the security conditions to ensure that selfish miners behave honestly. Based on the security conditions, we derive a lower bound for the security overhead and analyze the trade-off between useful work efficiency and PoW safeguard. We further dive deep into the reward function design for the proposed dual-functional blockchain and provide practical design guidelines for reward functions assuming concavity and linearity respectively. Finally, simulation results are presented to validate and illustrate our analytical results.

Read more

5/30/2024

🌀

Saving proof-of-work by hierarchical block structure

Valdemar Melicher

YC

0

Reddit

0

We argue that the current POW based consensus algorithm of the Bitcoin network suffers from a fundamental economic discrepancy between the real world transaction (txn) costs incurred by miners and the wealth that is being transacted. Put simply, whether one transacts 1 satoshi or 1 bitcoin, the same amount of electricity is needed when including this txn into a block. The notorious Bitcoin blockchain problems such as its high energy usage per txn or its scalability issues are, either partially or fully, mere consequences of this fundamental economic inconsistency. We propose making the computational cost of securing the txns proportional to the wealth being transferred, at least temporarily. First, we present a simple incentive based model of Bitcoin's security. Then, guided by this model, we augment each txn by two parameters, one controlling the time spent securing this txn and the second determining the fraction of the network used to accomplish this. The current Bitcoin txns are naturally embedded into this parametrized space. Then we introduce a sequence of hierarchical block structures (HBSs) containing these parametrized txns. The first of those HBSs exploits only a single degree of freedom of the extended txn, namely the time investment, but it allows already for txns with a variable level of trust together with aligned network fees and energy usage. In principle, the last HBS should scale to tens of thousands timely txns per second while preserving what the previous HBSs achieved. We also propose a simple homotopy based transition mechanism which enables us to relatively safely and continuously introduce new HBSs into the existing blockchain. Our approach is constructive and as rigorous as possible and we attempt to analyze all aspects of these developments, al least at a conceptual level. The process is supported by evaluation on recent transaction data.

Read more

4/24/2024

🚀

The Security Performance Analysis of Blockchain System Based on Post-Quantum Cryptography -- A Case Study of Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Abel C. H. Chen

YC

0

Reddit

0

The current blockchain system for cryptocurrency exchanges primarily employs elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) for generating key pairs in wallets, and elliptic curve digital signature algorithms (ECDSA) for generating signatures in transactions. Consequently, with the maturation of quantum computing technology, the current blockchain system faces the risk of quantum computing attacks. Quantum computers may potentially counterfeit signatures produced by ECDSA. Therefore, this study analyzes the vulnerabilities of the current blockchain system to quantum computing attacks and proposes a post-quantum cryptography (PQC)-based blockchain system to enhance security by addressing and improving each identified weakness. Furthermore, this study proposes PQC-based wallets and PQC-based transactions, utilizing PQC digital signature algorithms to generate PQC-based signatures for the inputs in PQC-based transactions, thereby preventing signatures from being counterfeited by quantum computing. Experimental results demonstrate that the efficiency of the Dilithium algorithm, a PQC digital signature algorithm, in producing wallets, generating signatures, and verifying signatures surpasses that of ECDSA in the current blockchain system. Furthermore, the Dilithium algorithm also exhibits a higher security level.

Read more

4/29/2024