Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves

2311.04205

YC

0

Reddit

9

Published 4/22/2024 by Yihe Deng, Weitong Zhang, Zixiang Chen, Quanquan Gu

💬

Abstract

Misunderstandings arise not only in interpersonal communication but also between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs). Such discrepancies can make LLMs interpret seemingly unambiguous questions in unexpected ways, yielding incorrect responses. While it is widely acknowledged that the quality of a prompt, such as a question, significantly impacts the quality of the response provided by LLMs, a systematic method for crafting questions that LLMs can better comprehend is still underdeveloped. In this paper, we present a method named `Rephrase and Respond' (RaR), which allows LLMs to rephrase and expand questions posed by humans and provide responses in a single prompt. This approach serves as a simple yet effective prompting method for improving performance. We also introduce a two-step variant of RaR, where a rephrasing LLM first rephrases the question and then passes the original and rephrased questions together to a different responding LLM. This facilitates the effective utilization of rephrased questions generated by one LLM with another. Our experiments demonstrate that our methods significantly improve the performance of different models across a wide range to tasks. We further provide a comprehensive comparison between RaR and the popular Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods, both theoretically and empirically. We show that RaR is complementary to CoT and can be combined with CoT to achieve even better performance. Our work not only contributes to enhancing LLM performance efficiently and effectively but also sheds light on a fair evaluation of LLM capabilities. Data and codes are available at https://github.com/uclaml/Rephrase-and-Respond.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper addresses the issue of misunderstandings that can arise between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs) when using seemingly unambiguous questions.
  • The authors present a method called "Rephrase and Respond" (RaR) that allows LLMs to rephrase and expand questions posed by humans, and then provide responses in a single prompt.
  • The paper also introduces a two-step variant of RaR, where one LLM rephrases the question and then a different LLM responds to the original and rephrased questions.
  • The authors demonstrate that their methods significantly improve the performance of different LLMs across a wide range of tasks, and compare RaR to the popular Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, even when humans ask seemingly clear questions, LLMs can sometimes interpret them in unexpected ways, leading to incorrect responses. The authors of this paper have developed a method called "Rephrase and Respond" (RaR) to help address this issue.

The RaR method allows an LLM to first rephrase the original question in its own words, and then provide a response to both the original and rephrased questions. This helps the LLM better understand the intended meaning of the question, leading to more accurate and relevant responses.

The authors also introduce a two-step version of RaR, where one LLM rephrases the question, and then a different LLM provides the final response. This approach allows the strengths of multiple LLMs to be combined, further improving the quality of the answers.

The researchers tested their RaR methods on a variety of tasks and found that they significantly outperformed other approaches, including the popular Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods. They also show that RaR can be used in conjunction with CoT to achieve even better performance.

Overall, this research helps to enhance the performance of LLMs and sheds light on ways to more accurately evaluate their capabilities. By bridging the gap between human questions and LLM interpretations, the RaR method represents an important step forward in the field of natural language processing.

Technical Explanation

The authors of this paper recognized that misunderstandings can arise not only in interpersonal communication, but also between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs). These discrepancies can cause LLMs to interpret seemingly unambiguous questions in unexpected ways, leading to incorrect responses.

To address this issue, the researchers developed a method called "Rephrase and Respond" (RaR). RaR allows an LLM to first rephrase the original question posed by the human and then provide a response to both the original and rephrased questions in a single prompt. This approach helps the LLM better understand the intended meaning of the question, leading to more accurate and relevant responses.

The authors also introduced a two-step variant of RaR, where one LLM rephrases the question and then a different LLM provides the final response. This facilitates the effective utilization of rephrased questions generated by one LLM with another, further improving the quality of the answers.

The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of their RaR methods across a wide range of tasks. Their results demonstrated that RaR significantly outperformed other approaches, including the popular Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods.

Additionally, the authors provided a comprehensive comparison between RaR and CoT, both theoretically and empirically. They showed that RaR is complementary to CoT and can be combined with CoT to achieve even better performance.

Critical Analysis

The authors of this paper have made a valuable contribution to the field of natural language processing by addressing the issue of misunderstandings between humans and LLMs. Their RaR method represents a practical and effective approach for improving the performance of LLMs in responding to human-generated questions.

However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the limitations of the RaR method. For example, it would be helpful to understand the types of questions or tasks where RaR may not perform as well, or the computational resources required to implement the method.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or ethical implications of the RaR method. As with any AI-based system, it is important to consider how the method might amplify or introduce biases in the responses provided by LLMs.

Overall, the RaR method represents a promising approach for enhancing the performance of LLMs and improving the accuracy of their responses to human-generated questions. The authors have made a valuable contribution to the field, but further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential implications of the method.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel method called "Rephrase and Respond" (RaR) that addresses the issue of misunderstandings between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs). By allowing LLMs to rephrase and expand questions posed by humans, and then provide responses to both the original and rephrased questions, the RaR method helps to bridge the gap between human intent and LLM interpretation.

The researchers demonstrate that their RaR methods significantly outperform other approaches, including the popular Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods, across a wide range of tasks. They also show that RaR can be combined with CoT to achieve even better performance, highlighting the complementary nature of the two approaches.

This research not only contributes to enhancing the performance of LLMs, but also sheds light on the importance of fair and accurate evaluation of LLM capabilities. By addressing the issue of misunderstandings, the RaR method represents an important step forward in the development of more reliable and trustworthy language AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

📶

Rethinking ChatGPT's Success: Usability and Cognitive Behaviors Enabled by Auto-regressive LLMs' Prompting

Xinzhe Li, Ming Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Over the last decade, a wide range of training and deployment strategies for Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged. Among these, the prompting paradigms of Auto-regressive LLMs (AR-LLMs) have catalyzed a significant surge in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This paper aims to emphasize the significance of utilizing free-form modalities (forms of input and output) and verbal free-form contexts as user-directed channels (methods for transforming modalities) for downstream deployment. Specifically, we analyze the structure of modalities within both two types of LLMs and six task-specific channels during deployment. From the perspective of users, our analysis introduces and applies the analytical metrics of task customizability, transparency, and complexity to gauge their usability, highlighting the superior nature of AR-LLMs' prompting paradigms. Moreover, we examine the stimulation of diverse cognitive behaviors in LLMs through the adoption of free-form text and verbal contexts, mirroring human linguistic expressions of such behaviors. We then detail four common cognitive behaviors to underscore how AR-LLMs' prompting successfully imitate human-like behaviors using this free-form modality and channel. Lastly, the potential for improving LLM deployment, both as autonomous agents and within multi-agent systems, is identified via cognitive behavior concepts and principles.

Read more

5/20/2024

Large Language Models are Contrastive Reasoners

Large Language Models are Contrastive Reasoners

Liang Yao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Prompting methods play a crucial role in enhancing the capabilities of pre-trained large language models (LLMs). We explore how contrastive prompting (CP) significantly improves the ability of large language models to perform complex reasoning. We demonstrate that LLMs are decent contrastive reasoners by simply adding Let's give a correct and a wrong answer. before LLMs provide answers. Experiments on various large language models show that zero-shot contrastive prompting improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks without any hand-crafted few-shot examples, such as increasing the accuracy on GSM8K from 35.9% to 88.8% and AQUA-RAT from 41.3% to 62.2% with the state-of-the-art GPT-4 model. Our method not only surpasses zero-shot CoT and few-shot CoT in most arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks but also can seamlessly integrate with existing prompting methods, resulting in improved or comparable results when compared to state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/yao8839836/cp

Read more

5/24/2024

R4: Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

R4: Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

Taolin Zhang, Dongyang Li, Qizhou Chen, Chengyu Wang, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue, Xiaofeng He, Jun Huang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) leverage relevant content retrieved by information retrieval systems to generate correct responses, aiming to alleviate the hallucination problem. However, existing retriever-responder methods typically append relevant documents to the prompt of LLMs to perform text generation tasks without considering the interaction of fine-grained structural semantics between the retrieved documents and the LLMs. This issue is particularly important for accurate response generation as LLMs tend to ``lose in the middle'' when dealing with input prompts augmented with lengthy documents. In this work, we propose a new pipeline named ``Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder'' (R$^4$) to learn document orderings for retrieval-augmented LLMs, thereby further enhancing their generation abilities while the large numbers of parameters of LLMs remain frozen. The reordering learning process is divided into two steps according to the quality of the generated responses: document order adjustment and document representation enhancement. Specifically, document order adjustment aims to organize retrieved document orderings into beginning, middle, and end positions based on graph attention learning, which maximizes the reinforced reward of response quality. Document representation enhancement further refines the representations of retrieved documents for responses of poor quality via document-level gradient adversarial learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed pipeline achieves better factual question-answering performance on knowledge-intensive tasks compared to strong baselines across various public datasets. The source codes and trained models will be released upon paper acceptance.

Read more

5/7/2024

Can Small Language Models Help Large Language Models Reason Better?: LM-Guided Chain-of-Thought

Can Small Language Models Help Large Language Models Reason Better?: LM-Guided Chain-of-Thought

Jooyoung Lee, Fan Yang, Thanh Tran, Qian Hu, Emre Barut, Kai-Wei Chang, Chengwei Su

YC

0

Reddit

0

We introduce a novel framework, LM-Guided CoT, that leverages a lightweight (i.e., 10B) LM in reasoning tasks. Specifically, the lightweight LM first generates a rationale for each input instance. The Frozen large LM is then prompted to predict a task output based on the rationale generated by the lightweight LM. Our approach is resource-efficient in the sense that it only requires training the lightweight LM. We optimize the model through 1) knowledge distillation and 2) reinforcement learning from rationale-oriented and task-oriented reward signals. We assess our method with multi-hop extractive question answering (QA) benchmarks, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultiHopQA. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all baselines regarding answer prediction accuracy. We also find that reinforcement learning helps the model to produce higher-quality rationales with improved QA performance.

Read more

4/5/2024