# ReasonAgain: Using Extractable Symbolic Programs to Evaluate Mathematical Reasoning

## Overview

- This paper introduces a novel model called \modelname that uses extractable symbolic programs to evaluate mathematical reasoning.
- The model aims to better understand the capabilities and limitations of large language models in solving mathematical problems.
- The key contributions are a method for encapsulating the reasoning process and generating perturbations of the original question.

## Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new AI model called \modelname that is designed to analyze how well large language models can perform mathematical reasoning.

The researchers developed a way to capture the step-by-step thought process that a model uses to solve a math problem. They call this the "reasoning process." The model also generates variations of the original math problem, similar to how a human might rephrase a question in different ways.

By examining how the language model responds to the original problem and the variations, the researchers can better understand the model's true mathematical reasoning capabilities, rather than just its ability to produce the correct final answer. This provides deeper insights into the strengths and limitations of current language models when it comes to solving math problems.

## Key Findings

- The \modelname model is able to extract the symbolic programs that represent the reasoning process used by language models to solve math problems.
- Analyzing the model's responses to the original and perturbed math problems reveals insights into the model's mathematical reasoning abilities.
- The findings from this work can help advance the development of language models that are more robust and capable at tasks requiring symbolic reasoning.

## Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the \modelname model, which aims to better evaluate the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models.

The first step is to "encapsulate the reasoning process" used by the language model to solve a given math problem. This involves extracting a symbolic program that represents the step-by-step logical reasoning the model employs.

Next, the researchers generate "perturbations" of the original math question. These are variations on the question that are semantically similar but have slightly different wording or structure. The language model is then asked to solve these perturbed versions of the problem.

By analyzing how the model responds to the original problem and the perturbations, the researchers can gain insights into the true mathematical reasoning abilities of the language model, beyond just its ability to produce the correct final answer. This provides a more nuanced evaluation compared to simply measuring the model's overall accuracy.

The results of this analysis can help advance the development of language models that are more robust and capable at tasks involving symbolic reasoning, a key limitation of current models.

## Critical Analysis

A key strength of this work is the novel approach of extracting the symbolic reasoning process used by language models, rather than just evaluating their final outputs. This provides a more detailed and insightful evaluation of their mathematical reasoning capabilities.

However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations of this approach. For example, the process of extracting the symbolic reasoning programs could itself introduce biases or inaccuracies. Additionally, the set of perturbations generated may not fully capture the breadth of variations a human would consider.

Further research is needed to refine the \modelname methodology and explore its broader applicability beyond mathematical reasoning. Extending this approach to other domains that require symbolic thinking could yield valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of large language models.

## Conclusion

This paper introduces the \modelname model, which uses extractable symbolic programs to deeply evaluate the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models. By analyzing how models respond to both the original problems and carefully generated perturbations, the researchers are able to gain nuanced insights into the models' true symbolic reasoning capabilities.

The findings from this work represent an important step forward in understanding the strengths and limitations of current language models, and can help guide the development of more robust and capable models in the future. This type of rigorous and multifaceted evaluation is crucial as language models become increasingly relied upon for high-stakes applications requiring logical reasoning.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

1