Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey

    Read original: arXiv:2402.11291 - Published 9/17/2024 by Panagiotis Giadikiaroglou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos Stamou
    Total Score

    0

    💬

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • This paper explores the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving puzzles, which provides critical insights into their potential and challenges in artificial intelligence (AI).
    • The researchers use a unique taxonomy to categorize puzzles into rule-based and rule-less types, and assess LLMs' performance through various methods like prompting techniques, neuro-symbolic approaches, and fine-tuning.
    • The paper reviews relevant datasets and benchmarks, identifying significant challenges for LLMs in complex puzzle scenarios that require advanced logical inference.
    • The findings highlight the disparity between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning, emphasizing the need for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance LLMs' puzzle-solving proficiency and contribute to AI's logical reasoning and creative problem-solving advancements.

    Plain English Explanation

    Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. Researchers in this paper wanted to see how well these LLMs can solve puzzles, which is a good way to test their ability to reason and problem-solve.

    The researchers divided puzzles into two main types: rule-based puzzles that have clear rules, and rule-less puzzles that are more open-ended. They then used different techniques to assess how well the LLMs could solve these puzzles, including prompting the models with specific instructions, using a combination of neural networks and symbolic reasoning, and fine-tuning the models on puzzle-solving tasks.

    By reviewing the performance of LLMs on various puzzle datasets and benchmarks, the researchers found that while the models can do well on simple puzzles, they struggle with more complex ones that require advanced logical thinking. This suggests that current LLMs still have a long way to go before they can match human-level reasoning and problem-solving abilities.

    The paper highlights the need for new strategies and more diverse puzzle datasets to help improve the logical reasoning and creative problem-solving capabilities of LLMs. Advancing these abilities in AI systems could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from scientific discovery to creative problem solving.

    Technical Explanation

    The paper presents a comprehensive survey on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving various types of puzzles, which serves as a proxy for assessing their logical reasoning and problem-solving abilities.

    The researchers leverage a unique taxonomy that categorizes puzzles into two main classes: rule-based and rule-less. This distinction allows for a more nuanced evaluation of LLM performance across different puzzle types, which require varying levels of logical inference and creative thinking.

    To assess LLM capabilities, the paper explores several methodologies, including:

    1. Prompting Techniques: Evaluating LLM performance on puzzles through carefully crafted prompts that provide instructions, context, or partial information to the models.
    2. Neuro-Symbolic Approaches: Combining the strengths of neural networks and symbolic reasoning to tackle puzzle-solving tasks that require both statistical and logical inference.
    3. Fine-Tuning: Adapting LLMs to specific puzzle-solving domains through additional training on relevant datasets and benchmarks.

    The paper's critical review of the literature covers a range of relevant datasets and benchmarks, such as mathematical reasoning, structured graph reasoning, and general reasoning capabilities. The analysis of LLM performance on these tasks reveals significant challenges, particularly in complex puzzle scenarios that require advanced logical inference.

    The survey's key findings highlight the substantial gap between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning, underscoring the necessity for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance LLMs' puzzle-solving proficiency. Addressing these limitations is crucial for driving AI's progress in logical reasoning and creative problem-solving domains.

    Critical Analysis

    The paper provides a valuable and comprehensive survey on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving various types of puzzles. The researchers' use of a unique taxonomy to categorize puzzles into rule-based and rule-less types is a particularly insightful approach, as it allows for a more nuanced assessment of LLM performance across different levels of complexity.

    While the paper's findings clearly demonstrate the current limitations of LLMs in tackling complex puzzle scenarios that require advanced logical inference, the authors acknowledge that this is an active area of research, and there is ample room for improvement.

    One potential limitation of the study is that it primarily focuses on LLM performance on existing puzzle datasets and benchmarks, which may not fully capture the breadth of real-world problem-solving challenges. Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs through the use of novel architectures or training strategies could be an important area for future research.

    Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or fairness implications of using LLMs for puzzle-solving tasks, which is an important consideration when deploying such systems in practical applications. Exploring these ethical and societal concerns could be a valuable direction for future work.

    Overall, this survey presents a well-designed and insightful analysis of LLM capabilities in puzzle solving, underscoring the critical need for continued advancements in AI's logical reasoning and creative problem-solving abilities. The findings and recommendations provided in this paper serve as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners working to push the boundaries of what LLMs can achieve.

    Conclusion

    This comprehensive survey on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving puzzles offers critical insights into the current state of AI's logical reasoning and problem-solving abilities. By leveraging a unique taxonomy to assess LLM performance across different puzzle types, the researchers have identified significant challenges for these models in complex scenarios that require advanced inference and creative thinking.

    The paper's findings highlight the substantial gap between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning, emphasizing the necessity for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance the puzzle-solving proficiency of these AI systems. Addressing these limitations is a crucial step towards developing AI that can tackle a wide range of logical and creative problem-solving tasks, with far-reaching implications for scientific discovery, technological innovation, and societal well-being.

    As the field of AI continues to evolve, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working to push the boundaries of what is possible with Large Language Models. By building on the insights and recommendations provided in this paper, the community can work towards closing the gap between AI and human-level reasoning, unlocking new frontiers of knowledge and problem-solving capabilities.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey

    Panagiotis Giadikiaroglou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos Stamou

    Exploring the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in puzzle solving unveils critical insights into their potential and challenges in AI, marking a significant step towards understanding their applicability in complex reasoning tasks. This survey leverages a unique taxonomy -- dividing puzzles into rule-based and rule-less categories -- to critically assess LLMs through various methodologies, including prompting techniques, neuro-symbolic approaches, and fine-tuning. Through a critical review of relevant datasets and benchmarks, we assess LLMs' performance, identifying significant challenges in complex puzzle scenarios. Our findings highlight the disparity between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning, particularly in those requiring advanced logical inference. The survey underscores the necessity for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance LLMs' puzzle-solving proficiency and contribute to AI's logical reasoning and creative problem-solving advancements.

    Read more

    9/17/2024

    Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
    Total Score

    0

    Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges

    Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng Yin

    Mathematical reasoning serves as a cornerstone for assessing the fundamental cognitive capabilities of human intelligence. In recent times, there has been a notable surge in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. However, the landscape of mathematical problem types is vast and varied, with LLM-oriented techniques undergoing evaluation across diverse datasets and settings. This diversity makes it challenging to discern the true advancements and obstacles within this burgeoning field. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions: i) a comprehensive exploration of the various mathematical problems and their corresponding datasets that have been investigated; ii) an examination of the spectrum of LLM-oriented techniques that have been proposed for mathematical problem-solving; iii) an overview of factors and concerns affecting LLMs in solving math; and iv) an elucidation of the persisting challenges within this domain. To the best of our knowledge, this survey stands as one of the first extensive examinations of the landscape of LLMs in the realm of mathematics, providing a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.

    Read more

    9/18/2024

    Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey
    Total Score

    0

    Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey

    Philipp Mondorf, Barbara Plank

    Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown impressive performance on tasks involving reasoning, leading to a lively debate on whether these models possess reasoning capabilities similar to humans. However, despite these successes, the depth of LLMs' reasoning abilities remains uncertain. This uncertainty partly stems from the predominant focus on task performance, measured through shallow accuracy metrics, rather than a thorough investigation of the models' reasoning behavior. This paper seeks to address this gap by providing a comprehensive review of studies that go beyond task accuracy, offering deeper insights into the models' reasoning processes. Furthermore, we survey prevalent methodologies to evaluate the reasoning behavior of LLMs, emphasizing current trends and efforts towards more nuanced reasoning analyses. Our review suggests that LLMs tend to rely on surface-level patterns and correlations in their training data, rather than on sophisticated reasoning abilities. Additionally, we identify the need for further research that delineates the key differences between human and LLM-based reasoning. Through this survey, we aim to shed light on the complex reasoning processes within LLMs.

    Read more

    8/7/2024

    Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey
    Total Score

    0

    Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey

    Aske Plaat, Annie Wong, Suzan Verberne, Joost Broekens, Niki van Stein, Thomas Back

    Scaling up language models to billions of parameters has opened up possibilities for in-context learning, allowing instruction tuning and few-shot learning on tasks that the model was not specifically trained for. This has achieved breakthrough performance on language tasks such as translation, summarization, and question-answering. Furthermore, in addition to these associative System 1 tasks, recent advances in Chain-of-thought prompt learning have demonstrated strong System 2 reasoning abilities, answering a question in the field of artificial general intelligence whether LLMs can reason. The field started with the question whether LLMs can solve grade school math word problems. This paper reviews the rapidly expanding field of prompt-based reasoning with LLMs. Our taxonomy identifies different ways to generate, evaluate, and control multi-step reasoning. We provide an in-depth coverage of core approaches and open problems, and we propose a research agenda for the near future. Finally, we highlight the relation between reasoning and prompt-based learning, and we discuss the relation between reasoning, sequential decision processes, and reinforcement learning. We find that self-improvement, self-reflection, and some metacognitive abilities of the reasoning processes are possible through the judicious use of prompts. True self-improvement and self-reasoning, to go from reasoning with LLMs to reasoning by LLMs, remains future work.

    Read more

    7/17/2024