Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security

2404.09005

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/6/2024 by Zishuo Zhao, Zhixuan Fang, Xuechao Wang, Xi Chen, Yuan Zhou
Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Security

Abstract

Most concurrent blockchain systems rely heavily on the Proof-of-Work (PoW) or Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanisms for decentralized consensus and security assurance. However, the substantial energy expenditure stemming from computationally intensive yet meaningless tasks has raised considerable concerns surrounding traditional PoW approaches, The PoS mechanism, while free of energy consumption, is subject to security and economic issues. Addressing these issues, the paradigm of Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW) seeks to employ challenges of practical significance as PoW, thereby imbuing energy consumption with tangible value. While previous efforts in Proof of Learning (PoL) explored the utilization of deep learning model training SGD tasks as PoUW challenges, recent research has revealed its vulnerabilities to adversarial attacks and the theoretical hardness in crafting a byzantine-secure PoL mechanism. In this paper, we introduce the concept of incentive-security that incentivizes rational provers to behave honestly for their best interest, bypassing the existing hardness to design a PoL mechanism with computational efficiency, a provable incentive-security guarantee and controllable difficulty. Particularly, our work is secure against two attacks to the recent work of Jia et al. [2021], and also improves the computational overhead from $Theta(1)$ to $O(frac{log E}{E})$. Furthermore, while most recent research assumes trusted problem providers and verifiers, our design also guarantees frontend incentive-security even when problem providers are untrusted, and verifier incentive-security that bypasses the Verifier's Dilemma. By incorporating ML training into blockchain consensus mechanisms with provable guarantees, our research not only proposes an eco-friendly solution to blockchain systems, but also provides a proposal for a completely decentralized computing power market in the new AI age.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper proposes a "Proof-of-Learning" consensus mechanism for blockchains, which incentivizes participants to learn and contribute useful knowledge to the network.
  • It explores how this approach can help address issues of centralization and incentive alignment in existing blockchain consensus models like Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake.
  • The authors analyze the game-theoretic properties of the Proof-of-Learning model and show how it can achieve security and incentive alignment without relying on resource-intensive mining or unequal token distribution.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to manage and validate transactions on a blockchain network, called "Proof-of-Learning." The key idea is to incentivize participants to actively learn and contribute useful knowledge to the network, rather than just expending computing power or holding tokens.

In traditional blockchains, the consensus process relies on Proof-of-Work (mining) or Proof-of-Stake (token ownership). These approaches can lead to centralization, as large players with more resources dominate the network. The Proof-of-Learning model aims to create a more decentralized and equitable system.

Under this new model, participants are rewarded for demonstrating that they have learned and can apply relevant knowledge. This could involve passing quizzes, solving problems, or generating insights that are valuable to the network. By encouraging learning and contribution, the system aligns the incentives of participants with the overall health and progress of the blockchain.

The researchers analyze how this Proof-of-Learning approach can achieve security and incentive compatibility, without the downsides of existing consensus mechanisms. This could help create more sustainable and inclusive blockchain networks that foster knowledge sharing and collective intelligence, rather than just raw computing power or wealth.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel "Proof-of-Learning" consensus mechanism for blockchains, which aims to address issues of centralization and incentive alignment in existing models like Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake.

In the Proof-of-Learning model, participants are rewarded for demonstrating their knowledge and contributing valuable insights to the network. This could involve passing quizzes, solving problems, or generating novel solutions that are then validated by the community. By aligning incentives with learning and contribution, rather than just raw computing power or token holdings, the authors argue that this approach can promote a more decentralized and sustainable blockchain ecosystem.

The paper provides a game-theoretic analysis of the Proof-of-Learning model, showing how it can achieve security and incentive compatibility without the drawbacks of traditional consensus mechanisms. The authors also discuss how this model relates to and builds upon concepts from learning-based resource allocation and decentralized storage frameworks.

Critical Analysis

The Proof-of-Learning concept presented in the paper is an intriguing approach to addressing some of the shortcomings of existing blockchain consensus models. By incentivizing learning and knowledge contribution, rather than just raw computational power or token wealth, the authors argue that this model can promote a more decentralized and sustainable blockchain ecosystem.

However, the paper does not fully address potential challenges in implementing and scaling such a system. For example, it is unclear how the network would reliably assess and validate the knowledge and contributions of participants, especially at large scales. There may also be concerns around the potential for gaming or manipulation of the learning-based incentive system.

Additionally, the game-theoretic analysis provided in the paper, while insightful, does not fully consider the complexity of human behavior and the potential for unanticipated strategic dynamics to emerge in a real-world deployment.

Further research and experimentation would be needed to understand the practical feasibility and long-term viability of the Proof-of-Learning approach, especially in comparison to other emerging consensus models like Proof-of-Stake and Proof-of-Stake. The authors acknowledge these limitations and suggest avenues for future work.

Conclusion

The Proof-of-Learning consensus mechanism proposed in this paper represents a novel and thought-provoking approach to addressing some of the key challenges facing blockchain networks, such as centralization and incentive alignment. By shifting the focus from raw computational power or token wealth to the active learning and contribution of participants, the authors aim to create a more decentralized and sustainable blockchain ecosystem.

While the technical analysis and game-theoretic modeling provide valuable insights, further research and real-world experimentation would be needed to fully assess the practical viability and long-term implications of the Proof-of-Learning model. Nonetheless, this paper contributes an important conceptual framework for rethinking the fundamental incentive structures underlying blockchain consensus, with potentially far-reaching implications for the future of decentralized technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

A Dual-functional Blockchain Framework for Solving Distributed Optimization

A Dual-functional Blockchain Framework for Solving Distributed Optimization

Weihang Cao, Xintong Ling, Jiaheng Wang, Xiqi Gao, Zhi Ding

YC

0

Reddit

0

Proof of Work (PoW) has been extensively utilized as the foundation of blockchain's security, consistency, and tamper-resistance. However, long has it been criticized for its tremendous and inefficient utilization of computational power and energy. In this work, we design a dual-functional blockchain framework that uses solving optimization problems to reach consensus as an alternative to PoW, channeling wasted resources into useful work. We model and analyze our framework by developing discrete Markov chains, and derive the security conditions to ensure that selfish miners behave honestly. Based on the security conditions, we derive a lower bound for the security overhead and analyze the trade-off between useful work efficiency and PoW safeguard. We further dive deep into the reward function design for the proposed dual-functional blockchain and provide practical design guidelines for reward functions assuming concavity and linearity respectively. Finally, simulation results are presented to validate and illustrate our analytical results.

Read more

5/30/2024

📈

Replacing Cryptopuzzles with Useful Computation in Blockchain Proof-of-Work Protocols

Andrea Merlina, Thiago Garrett, Roman Vitenberg

YC

0

Reddit

0

Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains have emerged as a robust and effective consensus mechanism in open environments, leading to widespread deployment with numerous cryptocurrency platforms and substantial investments. However, the commonly deployed PoW implementations are all based on solving cryptographic puzzles. Researchers have been pursuing the compelling idea of replacing cryptopuzzles with useful computing tasks for over a decade, in face of the substantial computational capacity of blockchain networks and the global pursuit of a more sustainable IT infrastructure. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the prerequisites for alternative classes of tasks. We provide insight into the effect of introducing usefulness and of transitioning to task classes other than cryptopuzzles. Having distilled the prerequisites, we use them to examine proposed designs from existing literature. Finally, we discuss pertinent techniques and present research gaps in the current state-of-the-art.

Read more

5/15/2024

Proof of Quality: A Costless Paradigm for Trustless Generative AI Model Inference on Blockchains

Proof of Quality: A Costless Paradigm for Trustless Generative AI Model Inference on Blockchains

Zhenjie Zhang, Yuyang Rao, Hao Xiao, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin Yang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Generative AI models, such as GPT-4 and Stable Diffusion, have demonstrated powerful and disruptive capabilities in natural language and image tasks. However, deploying these models in decentralized environments remains challenging. Unlike traditional centralized deployment, systematically guaranteeing the integrity of AI model services in fully decentralized environments, particularly on trustless blockchains, is both crucial and difficult. In this paper, we present a new inference paradigm called emph{proof of quality} (PoQ) to enable the deployment of arbitrarily large generative models on blockchain architecture. Unlike traditional approaches based on validating inference procedures, such as ZKML or OPML, our PoQ paradigm focuses on the outcome quality of model inference. Using lightweight BERT-based cross-encoders as our underlying quality evaluation model, we design and implement PQML, the first practical protocol for real-world NLP generative model inference on blockchains, tailored for popular open-source models such as Llama 3 and Mixtral. Our analysis demonstrates that our protocol is robust against adversarial but rational participants in ecosystems, where lazy or dishonest behavior results in fewer benefits compared to well-behaving participants. The computational overhead of validating the quality evaluation is minimal, allowing quality validators to complete the quality check within a second, even using only a CPU. Preliminary simulation results show that PoQ consensus is generated in milliseconds, 1,000 times faster than any existing scheme.

Read more

5/31/2024

🌀

Saving proof-of-work by hierarchical block structure

Valdemar Melicher

YC

0

Reddit

0

We argue that the current POW based consensus algorithm of the Bitcoin network suffers from a fundamental economic discrepancy between the real world transaction (txn) costs incurred by miners and the wealth that is being transacted. Put simply, whether one transacts 1 satoshi or 1 bitcoin, the same amount of electricity is needed when including this txn into a block. The notorious Bitcoin blockchain problems such as its high energy usage per txn or its scalability issues are, either partially or fully, mere consequences of this fundamental economic inconsistency. We propose making the computational cost of securing the txns proportional to the wealth being transferred, at least temporarily. First, we present a simple incentive based model of Bitcoin's security. Then, guided by this model, we augment each txn by two parameters, one controlling the time spent securing this txn and the second determining the fraction of the network used to accomplish this. The current Bitcoin txns are naturally embedded into this parametrized space. Then we introduce a sequence of hierarchical block structures (HBSs) containing these parametrized txns. The first of those HBSs exploits only a single degree of freedom of the extended txn, namely the time investment, but it allows already for txns with a variable level of trust together with aligned network fees and energy usage. In principle, the last HBS should scale to tens of thousands timely txns per second while preserving what the previous HBSs achieved. We also propose a simple homotopy based transition mechanism which enables us to relatively safely and continuously introduce new HBSs into the existing blockchain. Our approach is constructive and as rigorous as possible and we attempt to analyze all aspects of these developments, al least at a conceptual level. The process is supported by evaluation on recent transaction data.

Read more

4/24/2024