Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data
2404.14367
0
5
Abstract
Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models. There are several distinct approaches for preference fine-tuning, including supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), and contrastive learning. Different methods come with different implementation tradeoffs and performance differences, and existing empirical findings present different conclusions, for instance, some results show that online RL is quite important to attain good fine-tuning results, while others find (offline) contrastive or even purely supervised methods sufficient. This raises a natural question: what kind of approaches are important for fine-tuning with preference data and why? In this paper, we answer this question by performing a rigorous analysis of a number of fine-tuning techniques on didactic and full-scale LLM problems. Our main finding is that, in general, approaches that use on-policy sampling or attempt to push down the likelihood on certain responses (i.e., employ a negative gradient) outperform offline and maximum likelihood objectives. We conceptualize our insights and unify methods that use on-policy sampling or negative gradient under a notion of mode-seeking objectives for categorical distributions. Mode-seeking objectives are able to alter probability mass on specific bins of a categorical distribution at a fast rate compared to maximum likelihood, allowing them to relocate masses across bins more effectively. Our analysis prescribes actionable insights for preference fine-tuning of LLMs and informs how data should be collected for maximal improvement.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper explores preference fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), which aims to align the models' outputs with human preferences.
- The authors argue that current preference fine-tuning methods should leverage suboptimal, on-policy data (i.e., data generated by the model during deployment) rather than relying solely on expert-curated data.
- The paper proposes a unifying framework for characterizing different preference fine-tuning approaches and evaluates their relative merits.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a technique called "preference fine-tuning," which is used to align the outputs of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. These models are trained on vast amounts of data, but their outputs may not always align with what humans consider desirable or ethical.
The authors of the paper argue that current preference fine-tuning methods could be improved by using data generated by the model during deployment, rather than just relying on expert-curated data. This "suboptimal, on-policy data" may contain valuable information about the model's actual behavior and the types of outputs it produces in real-world situations.
The paper proposes a framework to help understand and compare different preference fine-tuning approaches, evaluating their relative strengths and weaknesses. This could inform the development of more effective techniques for aligning LLMs with human values and preferences.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a unifying framework for characterizing preference fine-tuning methods for large language models (LLMs). The authors argue that current approaches, which rely primarily on expert-curated "offline" data, could be improved by leveraging "suboptimal, on-policy" data generated by the model during deployment.
The proposed framework encompasses three key components: (1) the preference learning objective, (2) the data collection process, and (3) the fine-tuning procedure. The authors analyze how different preference fine-tuning methods instantiate these components and discuss the trade-offs involved.
The paper also includes an empirical evaluation of several preference fine-tuning approaches on language modeling and text generation tasks. The results suggest that methods leveraging suboptimal, on-policy data can outperform those relying solely on expert-curated data, particularly when the preference learning objective is misaligned with the original training objective.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important points about the potential limitations of current preference fine-tuning methods and the value of incorporating suboptimal, on-policy data. By proposing a unifying framework, the authors provide a useful tool for analyzing and comparing different approaches, which could inform the development of more effective techniques.
However, the paper does not address potential challenges or risks associated with using suboptimal, on-policy data, such as the potential for amplifying biases or undesirable behaviors already present in the model. Additionally, the empirical evaluation is limited in scope and may not fully capture the complexities of real-world deployment scenarios.
Further research is needed to better understand the trade-offs and practical considerations involved in leveraging suboptimal, on-policy data for preference fine-tuning. Rigorous testing and evaluation in diverse use cases will be crucial to ensure the safety and reliability of these techniques.
Conclusion
The paper presents a compelling argument for incorporating suboptimal, on-policy data into preference fine-tuning methods for large language models. By proposing a unifying framework and empirically evaluating different approaches, the authors provide valuable insights that could inform the development of more effective techniques for aligning LLMs with human preferences.
As the use of LLMs continues to grow, ensuring their outputs align with societal values and ethical norms will be of paramount importance. The ideas put forth in this paper represent an important step towards addressing this challenge and could have significant implications for the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Using LLMs to Model the Beliefs and Preferences of Targeted Populations
Keiichi Namikoshi, Alex Filipowicz, David A. Shamma, Rumen Iliev, Candice L. Hogan, Nikos Arechiga
0
0
We consider the problem of aligning a large language model (LLM) to model the preferences of a human population. Modeling the beliefs, preferences, and behaviors of a specific population can be useful for a variety of different applications, such as conducting simulated focus groups for new products, conducting virtual surveys, and testing behavioral interventions, especially for interventions that are expensive, impractical, or unethical. Existing work has had mixed success using LLMs to accurately model human behavior in different contexts. We benchmark and evaluate two well-known fine-tuning approaches and evaluate the resulting populations on their ability to match the preferences of real human respondents on a survey of preferences for battery electric vehicles (BEVs). We evaluate our models against their ability to match population-wide statistics as well as their ability to match individual responses, and we investigate the role of temperature in controlling the trade-offs between these two. Additionally, we propose and evaluate a novel loss term to improve model performance on responses that require a numeric response.
4/1/2024
š¬
Aligning language models with human preferences
Tomasz Korbak
0
0
Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.
4/19/2024
Get more for less: Principled Data Selection for Warming Up Fine-Tuning in LLMs
Feiyang Kang, Hoang Anh Just, Yifan Sun, Himanshu Jahagirdar, Yuanzhi Zhang, Rongxing Du, Anit Kumar Sahu, Ruoxi Jia
0
0
This work focuses on leveraging and selecting from vast, unlabeled, open data to pre-fine-tune a pre-trained language model. The goal is to minimize the need for costly domain-specific data for subsequent fine-tuning while achieving desired performance levels. While many data selection algorithms have been designed for small-scale applications, rendering them unsuitable for our context, some emerging methods do cater to language data scales. However, they often prioritize data that aligns with the target distribution. While this strategy may be effective when training a model from scratch, it can yield limited results when the model has already been pre-trained on a different distribution. Differing from prior work, our key idea is to select data that nudges the pre-training distribution closer to the target distribution. We show the optimality of this approach for fine-tuning tasks under certain conditions. We demonstrate the efficacy of our methodology across a diverse array of tasks (NLU, NLG, zero-shot) with models up to 2.7B, showing that it consistently surpasses other selection methods. Moreover, our proposed method is significantly faster than existing techniques, scaling to millions of samples within a single GPU hour. Our code is open-sourced (Code repository: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DV4LLM-D761/ ). While fine-tuning offers significant potential for enhancing performance across diverse tasks, its associated costs often limit its widespread adoption; with this work, we hope to lay the groundwork for cost-effective fine-tuning, making its benefits more accessible.
5/7/2024
Analyzing the Impact of Data Selection and Fine-Tuning on Economic and Political Biases in LLMs
Ahmed Agiza, Mohamed Mostagir, Sherief Reda
0
0
In an era where language models are increasingly integrated into decision-making and communication, understanding the biases within Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes imperative, especially when these models are applied in the economic and political domains. This work investigates the impact of fine-tuning and data selection on economic and political biases in LLM. We explore the methodological aspects of biasing LLMs towards specific ideologies, mindful of the biases that arise from their extensive training on diverse datasets. Our approach, distinct from earlier efforts that either focus on smaller models or entail resource-intensive pre-training, employs Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques. These techniques allow for the alignment of LLMs with targeted ideologies by modifying a small subset of parameters. We introduce a systematic method for dataset selection, annotation, and instruction tuning, and we assess its effectiveness through both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Our work analyzes the potential of embedding specific biases into LLMs and contributes to the dialogue on the ethical application of AI, highlighting the importance of deploying AI in a manner that aligns with societal values.
4/23/2024