A Practical Multilevel Governance Framework for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

2404.13719

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/23/2024 by Lukas D. Pohler, Klaus Diepold, Wendell Wallach
A Practical Multilevel Governance Framework for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Autonomous and intelligent systems (AIS) facilitate a wide range of beneficial applications across a variety of different domains. However, technical characteristics such as unpredictability and lack of transparency, as well as potential unintended consequences, pose considerable challenges to the current governance infrastructure. Furthermore, the speed of development and deployment of applications outpaces the ability of existing governance institutions to put in place effective ethical-legal oversight. New approaches for agile, distributed and multilevel governance are needed. This work presents a practical framework for multilevel governance of AIS. The framework enables mapping actors onto six levels of decision-making including the international, national and organizational levels. Furthermore, it offers the ability to identify and evolve existing tools or create new tools for guiding the behavior of actors within the levels. Governance mechanisms enable actors to shape and enforce regulations and other tools, which when complemented with good practices contribute to effective and comprehensive governance.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a practical multilevel governance framework for autonomous and intelligent systems (AIS) to address the challenges and opportunities they bring.
  • The framework aims to ensure the responsible development and deployment of AIS while balancing individual, organizational, and societal needs.
  • It involves coordination across multiple levels of governance, including individual, organizational, and societal levels, to establish guidelines, standards, and accountability mechanisms.

Plain English Explanation

Autonomous and intelligent systems (AIS), such as self-driving cars or AI-powered decision-making tools, are becoming increasingly prevalent in our lives. While these technologies offer many benefits, they also raise complex ethical, legal, and social challenges. A Practical Multilevel Governance Framework for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems proposes a framework to help navigate these challenges and ensure the responsible development and use of AIS.

The key idea is to have a multilevel approach to governance, where guidelines, standards, and accountability mechanisms are established at the individual, organizational, and societal levels. At the individual level, this could involve things like user education and consent procedures. At the organizational level, it might include internal policies, testing protocols, and oversight mechanisms. And at the societal level, there could be regulations, industry standards, and public dialogue.

By coordinating across these different levels, the framework aims to balance the needs and interests of individuals, organizations, and society as a whole. This is important because AIS can have far-reaching impacts that extend beyond the immediate users or developers. Visibility into AI Agents and Distributed Artificial Intelligence as Means to Achieve Goals are examples of how AIS can have broad societal implications that need to be considered.

The ultimate goal is to unlock the tremendous potential of AIS while also ensuring they are developed and used responsibly, in a way that respects fundamental rights and values. This requires a nuanced, collaborative approach that brings together multiple stakeholders and perspectives. Data to Product: Multimodal Conceptual Framework to Enable Responsible AI and Automatic Authorities: Power of AI highlight the importance of such a comprehensive framework.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a multilevel governance framework for autonomous and intelligent systems (AIS) that involves coordination across three key levels: individual, organizational, and societal.

At the individual level, the framework focuses on user-centric mechanisms, such as clear consent procedures, transparency around system capabilities and limitations, and educational resources to empower individuals to make informed decisions about AIS.

The organizational level introduces internal policies, testing protocols, and oversight mechanisms to ensure AIS are developed and deployed responsibly within companies and other institutions. This includes measures to address potential biases, safety concerns, and accountability for the impacts of AIS.

At the societal level, the framework calls for the establishment of industry-wide standards, regulations, and public dialogue to align the development and use of AIS with broader social values and ethical principles. This could involve collaborative efforts between policymakers, domain experts, and affected communities.

By coordinating these three levels of governance, the authors aim to balance the interests and needs of individuals, organizations, and society as a whole. This multilevel approach is designed to unlock the benefits of AIS while mitigating risks and ensuring the responsible development and deployment of these technologies.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that implementing this multilevel governance framework will be a complex and ongoing challenge, requiring collaboration and alignment across diverse stakeholders. They note that existing legal and regulatory frameworks may need to be updated to effectively address the unique characteristics and impacts of AIS.

One potential limitation of the framework is that it relies heavily on voluntary adoption and self-regulation at the organizational level. While industry-led initiatives and internal policies can be valuable, there may be a need for stronger external oversight and enforcement mechanisms to ensure consistent standards are upheld across the AIS ecosystem.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms or processes for how the different levels of governance would be coordinated and integrated. Further research and pilot implementations may be necessary to refine the practical details of this framework.

Nevertheless, the authors make a compelling case for the importance of a multifaceted, multilevel approach to governing autonomous and intelligent systems. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more pervasive, such a comprehensive framework will be crucial for upholding fundamental rights, mitigating societal risks, and realizing the full potential of AIS in a responsible manner.

Conclusion

The paper presents a practical multilevel governance framework for autonomous and intelligent systems (AIS) that aims to balance individual, organizational, and societal needs. By coordinating guidelines, standards, and accountability mechanisms across these three levels, the framework seeks to unlock the benefits of AIS while mitigating the ethical, legal, and social challenges they pose.

While implementing this framework will be a complex undertaking, requiring collaboration and alignment across diverse stakeholders, the authors make a compelling case for the importance of a comprehensive, multifaceted approach to governing AIS. As these technologies become increasingly pervasive, such a framework will be essential for ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AIS in a way that respects fundamental rights and values.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔍

Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies

Johannes Schneider, Rene Abraham, Christian Meske

YC

0

Reddit

0

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), specifically large language models like ChatGPT, has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Despite extensive debates on GenAI's transformative nature and regulatory measures, limited research addresses organizational governance, encompassing technical and business perspectives. Our review paper fills this gap by surveying recent works with the purpose of developing a framework for GenAI governance within companies. This framework outlines the scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms tailored to harness business opportunities as well as mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. Our research contributes a focused approach to GenAI governance, offering practical insights for companies navigating the challenges of GenAI adoption and highlighting research gaps.

Read more

6/11/2024

Towards an Ethical and Inclusive Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Multidimensional Framework

Towards an Ethical and Inclusive Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Multidimensional Framework

Ernesto Giralt Hern'andez

YC

0

Reddit

0

This article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on contemporary society and the importance of adopting an ethical approach to its development and implementation within organizations. It examines the technocritical perspective of some philosophers and researchers, who warn of the risks of excessive technologization that could undermine human autonomy. However, the article also acknowledges the active role that various actors, such as governments, academics, and civil society, can play in shaping the development of AI aligned with human and social values. A multidimensional approach is proposed that combines ethics with regulation, innovation, and education. It highlights the importance of developing detailed ethical frameworks, incorporating ethics into the training of professionals, conducting ethical impact audits, and encouraging the participation of stakeholders in the design of AI. In addition, four fundamental pillars are presented for the ethical implementation of AI in organizations: 1) Integrated values, 2) Trust and transparency, 3) Empowering human growth, and 4) Identifying strategic factors. These pillars encompass aspects such as alignment with the company's ethical identity, governance and accountability, human-centered design, continuous training, and adaptability to technological and market changes. The conclusion emphasizes that ethics must be the cornerstone of any organization's strategy that seeks to incorporate AI, establishing a solid framework that ensures that technology is developed and used in a way that respects and promotes human values.

Read more

5/6/2024

🤖

Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance

Anka Reuel, Trond Arne Undheim

YC

0

Reddit

0

Because of the speed of its development, broad scope of application, and its ability to augment human performance, generative AI challenges the very notions of governance, trust, and human agency. The technology's capacity to mimic human knowledge work, feedback loops including significant uptick in users, research, investor, policy, and media attention, data and compute resources, all lead to rapidly increasing capabilities. For those reasons, adaptive governance, where AI governance and AI co-evolve, is essential for governing generative AI. In sharp contrast to traditional governance's regulatory regimes that are based on a mix of rigid one-and-done provisions for disclosure, registration and risk management, which in the case of AI carry the potential for regulatory misalignment, this paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance. We define adaptive governance in the context of AI and outline an adaptive AI governance framework. We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities. We further provide examples of how the framework could be operationalized in practice. We then explain that the adaptive AI governance stance is not without its risks and limitations, such as insufficient oversight, insufficient depth, regulatory uncertainty, and regulatory capture, and provide potential approaches to fix these shortcomings.

Read more

6/10/2024

🎯

Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI

Meredith Ringel Morris, Jascha Sohl-dickstein, Noah Fiedel, Tris Warkentin, Allan Dafoe, Aleksandra Faust, Clement Farabet, Shane Legg

YC

0

Reddit

0

We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI. To develop our framework, we analyze existing definitions of AGI, and distill six principles that a useful ontology for AGI should satisfy. With these principles in mind, we propose Levels of AGI based on depth (performance) and breadth (generality) of capabilities, and reflect on how current systems fit into this ontology. We discuss the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models against these levels. Finally, we discuss how these levels of AGI interact with deployment considerations such as autonomy and risk, and emphasize the importance of carefully selecting Human-AI Interaction paradigms for responsible and safe deployment of highly capable AI systems.

Read more

6/7/2024