Planning In Natural Language Improves LLM Search For Code Generation
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how using natural language planning can improve the search capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for code generation.
- The researchers developed a framework called LILA (Language-Integrated Learning and Attainment) that combines language models with planning modules to enhance code generation performance.
- The key insight is that explicitly modeling the planning process in natural language can guide the language model to more effectively search for relevant code.
Plain English Explanation
Generating code from natural language instructions is a challenging task for AI systems. Large language models (LLMs) trained on vast amounts of text data can attempt to generate code, but their search process is often inefficient.
The researchers in this paper hypothesized that explicitly modeling the planning process in natural language could help guide the language model to more effectively search for and generate the desired code. They developed a framework called LILA (Language-Integrated Learning and Attainment) that combines an LLM with a separate planning module.
The planning module takes the natural language instructions and breaks them down into a structured plan, which is then used to inform the LLM's code generation. This allows the LLM to focus its search on the most relevant code snippets, rather than blindly generating code without a clear strategy.
The researchers found that this natural language planning approach improved the performance of the LLM on code generation tasks compared to a standard LLM-only approach. By incorporating the planning process explicitly, the system was able to generate more accurate and relevant code.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a framework called LILA (Language-Integrated Learning and Attainment) that combines a large language model (LLM) with a separate planning module to enhance code generation capabilities.
The planning module takes the natural language instructions as input and generates a structured plan represented in natural language. This plan is then used to guide the code generation module (the LLM) to focus its search on the most relevant code snippets.
The key innovation of LILA is the integration of the planning process into the code generation workflow. By explicitly modeling the planning step in natural language, the system can leverage the inherent planning capabilities of language models to better understand the high-level intent behind the code request and strategize the search and generation process accordingly.
The researchers evaluated LILA on a range of code generation tasks and found that it outperformed a standard LLM-only approach in terms of code quality, task completion rate, and other metrics. The natural language planning step helped the LLM generate more accurate and relevant code by guiding its search and generation process.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work in their research:
- The current planning module is relatively simple and could be improved with more advanced natural language processing techniques.
- The evaluation focused on a limited set of code generation tasks, and further testing is needed to assess the generalizability of the approach.
- The integration between the planning and code generation modules could be tightened, for example by allowing the LLM to provide feedback to refine the planning process.
Additionally, some potential concerns that could be further explored include:
- The computational overhead of the planning step and its impact on the overall efficiency of the system.
- The robustness of the approach to more complex or ambiguous natural language instructions.
- The scalability of the framework to handle increasingly sophisticated code generation requirements.
Overall, the authors have presented a promising approach that demonstrates the benefits of explicitly modeling the planning process in natural language for enhancing LLM-based code generation. Further research and development in this direction could lead to significant advancements in the field of AI-assisted software development.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework called LILA that combines large language models with natural language planning to improve code generation capabilities. By explicitly modeling the planning process in natural language, the system can guide the language model to more effectively search for and generate the desired code.
The researchers found that this planning-based approach outperformed a standard LLM-only method on a range of code generation tasks. This suggests that incorporating the planning process into the language model's workflow can be a valuable strategy for enhancing AI-driven software development.
While the current implementation has some limitations, the authors have laid the groundwork for further research and development in this promising area. Advancements in natural language processing and the continued progress of large language models could lead to even more powerful AI-assisted code generation systems in the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
Planning In Natural Language Improves LLM Search For Code Generation
Evan Wang, Federico Cassano, Catherine Wu, Yunfeng Bai, Will Song, Vaskar Nath, Ziwen Han, Sean Hendryx, Summer Yue, Hugh Zhang
While scaling training compute has led to remarkable improvements in large language models (LLMs), scaling inference compute has not yet yielded analogous gains. We hypothesize that a core missing component is a lack of diverse LLM outputs, leading to inefficient search due to models repeatedly sampling highly similar, yet incorrect generations. We empirically demonstrate that this lack of diversity can be mitigated by searching over candidate plans for solving a problem in natural language. Based on this insight, we propose PLANSEARCH, a novel search algorithm which shows strong results across HumanEval+, MBPP+, and LiveCodeBench (a contamination-free benchmark for competitive coding). PLANSEARCH generates a diverse set of observations about the problem and then uses these observations to construct plans for solving the problem. By searching over plans in natural language rather than directly over code solutions, PLANSEARCH explores a significantly more diverse range of potential solutions compared to baseline search methods. Using PLANSEARCH on top of Claude 3.5 Sonnet achieves a state-of-the-art pass@200 of 77.0% on LiveCodeBench, outperforming both the best score achieved without search (pass@1 = 41.4%) and using standard repeated sampling (pass@200 = 60.6%). Finally, we show that, across all models, search algorithms, and benchmarks analyzed, we can accurately predict performance gains due to search as a direct function of the diversity over generated ideas.
Read more9/6/2024
0
Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Bernd Bohnet, Azade Nova, Aaron T Parisi, Kevin Swersky, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai, Dale Schuurmans, Noah Fiedel, Hanie Sedghi
We seek to elevate the planning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)investigating four main directions. First, we construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning domains and natural language scenarios. This suite includes algorithms to generate instances with varying levels of difficulty, allowing for rigorous and systematic evaluation of LLM performance. Second, we investigate the use of in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM planning, exploring the direct relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance. Third, we demonstrate the positive impact of fine-tuning LLMs on optimal planning paths, as well as the effectiveness of incorporating model-driven search procedures. Finally, we investigate the performance of the proposed methods in out-of-distribution scenarios, assessing the ability to generalize to novel and unseen planning challenges.
Read more6/21/2024
0
NATURAL PLAN: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural Language Planning
Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Swaroop Mishra, Hugh Zhang, Xinyun Chen, Minmin Chen, Azade Nova, Le Hou, Heng-Tze Cheng, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi, Denny Zhou
We introduce NATURAL PLAN, a realistic planning benchmark in natural language containing 3 key tasks: Trip Planning, Meeting Planning, and Calendar Scheduling. We focus our evaluation on the planning capabilities of LLMs with full information on the task, by providing outputs from tools such as Google Flights, Google Maps, and Google Calendar as contexts to the models. This eliminates the need for a tool-use environment for evaluating LLMs on Planning. We observe that NATURAL PLAN is a challenging benchmark for state of the art models. For example, in Trip Planning, GPT-4 and Gemini 1.5 Pro could only achieve 31.1% and 34.8% solve rate respectively. We find that model performance drops drastically as the complexity of the problem increases: all models perform below 5% when there are 10 cities, highlighting a significant gap in planning in natural language for SoTA LLMs. We also conduct extensive ablation studies on NATURAL PLAN to further shed light on the (in)effectiveness of approaches such as self-correction, few-shot generalization, and in-context planning with long-contexts on improving LLM planning.
Read more6/10/2024
0
CodePlan: Unlocking Reasoning Potential in Large Langauge Models by Scaling Code-form Planning
Jiaxin Wen, Jian Guan, Hongning Wang, Wei Wu, Minlie Huang
Despite the remarkable success of large language models (LLMs) on traditional natural language processing tasks, their planning ability remains a critical bottleneck in tackling complex multi-step reasoning tasks. Existing approaches mainly rely on prompting or task-specific fine-tuning, often suffering from poor robustness and cross-task generalization. To address the limitation, we introduce CodePlan, a scalable framework that empowers LLMs to generate and follow textit{code-form plans} -- pseudocode that outlines high-level, structured reasoning processes. By leveraging the structured and versatile nature of code, CodePlan effectively captures the rich semantics and control flows inherent to sophisticated reasoning tasks. Importantly, CodePlan allows automatic extraction of code-form plans from massive, wide-ranging text corpora without the need for curated, task-specific datasets. This enables it to scale up efficiently and improve LLM's reasoning capabilities across diverse scenarios. To train CodePlan, we construct a large-scale dataset of 2M examples that integrate code-form plans with standard prompt-response pairs from existing corpora. With minimal computation overhead during both training and inference, CodePlan achieves a 25.1% relative improvement compared with directly generating responses, averaged across 13 challenging multi-step reasoning benchmarks, spanning mathematical reasoning, symbolic reasoning, instruction-following, multi-hop QA, and decision-making tasks. Further analysis reveals CodePlan's increasing performance gains on more complex reasoning tasks, as well as significant data efficiency thanks to its generalization ability.
Read more10/7/2024