Painful intelligence: What AI can tell us about human suffering
2
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This book uses artificial intelligence (AI) to understand human suffering or mental pain.
- Both humans and AI agents process information to achieve goals and obtain rewards, so AI can model the human brain and mind.
- The book aims to make this theory accessible to a general audience with some relevant scientific background.
Plain English Explanation
The book starts with the idea that suffering is mainly caused by frustration. Frustration means failing to achieve a goal or reward that an agent (whether AI or human) wanted or expected. Frustration is inevitable because the world is overwhelmingly complex, computational resources are limited, and good data is scarce. These limitations mean that agents acting in the real world must cope with uncontrollability, unpredictability, and uncertainty, all of which lead to frustration.
The book explores how learning or adaptation to the environment is fundamental to this modeling. While AI uses machine learning, humans and animals adapt through a combination of evolutionary mechanisms and ordinary learning. Even frustration is an error signal that the system uses for learning. The book examines various aspects and limitations of learning algorithms and their implications for suffering.
Finally, the computational theory is used to derive interventions or training methods that can reduce suffering in humans. The amount of frustration is expressed by a simple equation, which indicates how it can be reduced. These interventions are similar to those proposed by Buddhist and Stoic philosophy, including mindfulness meditation. The book can be seen as an exposition of a computational theory that justifies why such philosophies and meditation can reduce human suffering.
Technical Explanation
The paper uses the modern theory of artificial intelligence (AI) as a model for understanding human suffering or mental pain. The core idea is that both humans and sophisticated AI agents process information about the world in order to achieve goals and obtain rewards. This means that AI can be used as a model of the human brain and mind.
The book starts by assuming that suffering is mainly caused by frustration, which is the failure of an agent (whether AI or human) to achieve a goal or reward that it wanted or expected. Frustration is inevitable due to the overwhelming complexity of the world, limited computational resources, and scarcity of good data. These limitations mean that agents acting in the real world must cope with uncontrollability, unpredictability, and uncertainty, all of which lead to frustration.
Fundamental to this modeling is the idea of learning or adaptation to the environment. While AI uses machine learning, humans and animals adapt through a combination of evolutionary mechanisms and ordinary learning. Even frustration is an error signal that the system uses for learning. The book explores various aspects and limitations of learning algorithms and their implications regarding suffering.
In the final part of the book, the computational theory is used to derive various interventions or training methods that can reduce suffering in humans. The amount of frustration is expressed by a simple equation, which indicates how it can be reduced. Interestingly, the ensuing interventions are very similar to those proposed by Buddhist and Stoic philosophy, including mindfulness meditation. Therefore, the book can be interpreted as an exposition of a computational theory that justifies why such philosophies and meditation can reduce human suffering.
Critical Analysis
The book's use of AI as a model for understanding human suffering is an interesting and potentially valuable approach. By framing suffering in terms of frustration and the limitations of information processing, the book offers a novel perspective on this complex issue. The focus on learning and adaptation also highlights important connections between human and artificial intelligence.
However, it's important to consider the limitations and potential issues with this computational theory. While the model may capture some aspects of suffering, it's unclear how well it can account for the full breadth and depth of human emotional experiences. The book's emphasis on frustration and goal-achievement may overlook other important factors, such as social, cultural, and existential dimensions of suffering.
Additionally, the proposed interventions, while intriguing, may not be a panacea for all forms of human suffering. The book's parallels to Buddhist and Stoic philosophies are interesting, but it's crucial to consider the unique contexts and histories of these traditions, and how they may or may not translate to modern, technological societies.
Ultimately, while the book's use of AI as a model for understanding suffering is thought-provoking, readers should approach the conclusions with a critical eye. The book may be most valuable as a starting point for further exploration and discussion, rather than a definitive solution to the complex problem of human suffering.
Conclusion
This book uses the modern theory of artificial intelligence (AI) as a model for understanding human suffering or mental pain. The core idea is that both humans and sophisticated AI agents process information about the world in order to achieve goals and obtain rewards, which is why AI can be used as a model of the human brain and mind.
The book explores how frustration, or the failure to achieve a goal or reward, is a primary cause of suffering. It argues that frustration is inevitable due to the complexity of the world, limited computational resources, and scarcity of good data. The book also examines the role of learning and adaptation in this computational theory of suffering.
Finally, the book uses the computational model to derive interventions and training methods that can potentially reduce human suffering. Interestingly, these interventions are similar to those proposed by Buddhist and Stoic philosophy, including mindfulness meditation. The book can be seen as an exposition of a computational theory that justifies why such philosophies and practices may be effective in alleviating suffering.
While the book's use of AI as a model for understanding suffering is thought-provoking, readers should approach the conclusions with a critical eye. The model may not capture the full breadth of human emotional experiences, and the proposed interventions may not be a panacea for all forms of suffering. Nevertheless, the book offers a unique perspective and a starting point for further exploration and discussion on this complex and important issue.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
2
Painful intelligence: What AI can tell us about human suffering
Aapo Hyvarinen
This book uses the modern theory of artificial intelligence (AI) to understand human suffering or mental pain. Both humans and sophisticated AI agents process information about the world in order to achieve goals and obtain rewards, which is why AI can be used as a model of the human brain and mind. This book intends to make the theory accessible to a relatively general audience, requiring only some relevant scientific background. The book starts with the assumption that suffering is mainly caused by frustration. Frustration means the failure of an agent (whether AI or human) to achieve a goal or a reward it wanted or expected. Frustration is inevitable because of the overwhelming complexity of the world, limited computational resources, and scarcity of good data. In particular, such limitations imply that an agent acting in the real world must cope with uncontrollability, unpredictability, and uncertainty, which all lead to frustration. Fundamental in such modelling is the idea of learning, or adaptation to the environment. While AI uses machine learning, humans and animals adapt by a combination of evolutionary mechanisms and ordinary learning. Even frustration is fundamentally an error signal that the system uses for learning. This book explores various aspects and limitations of learning algorithms and their implications regarding suffering. At the end of the book, the computational theory is used to derive various interventions or training methods that will reduce suffering in humans. The amount of frustration is expressed by a simple equation which indicates how it can be reduced. The ensuing interventions are very similar to those proposed by Buddhist and Stoic philosophy, and include mindfulness meditation. Therefore, this book can be interpreted as an exposition of a computational theory justifying why such philosophies and meditation reduce human suffering.
Read more9/6/2024
🖼️
0
A social path to human-like artificial intelligence
Edgar A. Du'e~nez-Guzm'an, Suzanne Sadedin, Jane X. Wang, Kevin R. McKee, Joel Z. Leibo
Traditionally, cognitive and computer scientists have viewed intelligence solipsistically, as a property of unitary agents devoid of social context. Given the success of contemporary learning algorithms, we argue that the bottleneck in artificial intelligence (AI) progress is shifting from data assimilation to novel data generation. We bring together evidence showing that natural intelligence emerges at multiple scales in networks of interacting agents via collective living, social relationships and major evolutionary transitions, which contribute to novel data generation through mechanisms such as population pressures, arms races, Machiavellian selection, social learning and cumulative culture. Many breakthroughs in AI exploit some of these processes, from multi-agent structures enabling algorithms to master complex games like Capture-The-Flag and StarCraft II, to strategic communication in Diplomacy and the shaping of AI data streams by other AIs. Moving beyond a solipsistic view of agency to integrate these mechanisms suggests a path to human-like compounding innovation through ongoing novel data generation.
Read more5/28/2024
🤖
0
AI and Social Theory
Jakob Mokander, Ralph Schroeder
In this paper, we sketch a programme for AI driven social theory. We begin by defining what we mean by artificial intelligence (AI) in this context. We then lay out our model for how AI based models can draw on the growing availability of digital data to help test the validity of different social theories based on their predictive power. In doing so, we use the work of Randall Collins and his state breakdown model to exemplify that, already today, AI based models can help synthesize knowledge from a variety of sources, reason about the world, and apply what is known across a wide range of problems in a systematic way. However, we also find that AI driven social theory remains subject to a range of practical, technical, and epistemological limitations. Most critically, existing AI systems lack three essential capabilities needed to advance social theory in ways that are cumulative, holistic, open-ended, and purposeful. These are (1) semanticization, i.e., the ability to develop and operationalize verbal concepts to represent machine-manipulable knowledge, (2) transferability, i.e., the ability to transfer what has been learned in one context to another, and (3) generativity, i.e., the ability to independently create and improve on concepts and models. We argue that if the gaps identified here are addressed by further research, there is no reason why, in the future, the most advanced programme in social theory should not be led by AI-driven cumulative advances.
Read more7/10/2024
🤖
0
Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations
Herman Cappelen, Josh Dever
Can humans and artificial intelligences share concepts and communicate? 'Making AI Intelligible' shows that philosophical work on the metaphysics of meaning can help answer these questions. Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever use the externalist tradition in philosophy to create models of how AIs and humans can understand each other. In doing so, they illustrate ways in which that philosophical tradition can be improved. The questions addressed in the book are not only theoretically interesting, but the answers have pressing practical implications. Many important decisions about human life are now influenced by AI. In giving that power to AI, we presuppose that AIs can track features of the world that we care about (for example, creditworthiness, recidivism, cancer, and combatants). If AIs can share our concepts, that will go some way towards justifying this reliance on AI. This ground-breaking study offers insight into how to take some first steps towards achieving Interpretable AI.
Read more6/13/2024