Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representations

2404.12698

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/22/2024 by Xiao Zhang, Gosse Bouma, Johan Bos
Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representations

Abstract

Current open-domain neural semantics parsers show impressive performance. However, closer inspection of the symbolic meaning representations they produce reveals significant weaknesses: sometimes they tend to merely copy character sequences from the source text to form symbolic concepts, defaulting to the most frequent word sense based in the training distribution. By leveraging the hierarchical structure of a lexical ontology, we introduce a novel compositional symbolic representation for concepts based on their position in the taxonomical hierarchy. This representation provides richer semantic information and enhances interpretability. We introduce a neural taxonomical semantic parser to utilize this new representation system of predicates, and compare it with a standard neural semantic parser trained on the traditional meaning representation format, employing a novel challenge set and evaluation metric for evaluation. Our experimental findings demonstrate that the taxonomical model, trained on much richer and complex meaning representations, is slightly subordinate in performance to the traditional model using the standard metrics for evaluation, but outperforms it when dealing with out-of-vocabulary concepts. This finding is encouraging for research in computational semantics that aims to combine data-driven distributional meanings with knowledge-based symbolic representations.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach to neural semantic parsing that utilizes extremely rich symbolic meaning representations.
  • The authors introduce taxonomical encodings to capture complex relationships between concepts and entities.
  • The research aims to improve upon existing neural semantic parsing models by incorporating richer semantic information.

Plain English Explanation

The paper you provided describes a new way of doing natural language processing, specifically a technique called "neural semantic parsing." This is a fancy term for getting computers to understand the meaning behind human language, not just the literal words.

The key innovation in this research is the use of "taxonomical encodings." This means the system has a very detailed and structured way of representing the relationships between different concepts and entities. Rather than just looking at individual words, the model tries to understand how all the different ideas and things are connected.

This builds on previous work in the field of neural semantic parsing, but takes it a step further by incorporating much richer semantic information. The goal is to enable the models to gain a deeper, more nuanced comprehension of language.

By using these more sophisticated meaning representations, the researchers hope to create language understanding systems that are more accurate and versatile. This could have applications in areas like virtual assistants, language translation, and information retrieval.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel neural semantic parsing framework that utilizes extremely rich symbolic meaning representations. At the core of this approach are "taxonomical encodings" - detailed hierarchical structures that capture complex relationships between concepts, entities, and their properties.

This goes beyond previous work that relied more on syntactic information. The taxonomical encodings allow the model to represent a much richer set of semantic distinctions, such as part-whole relationships, class membership, and attribute associations.

The authors demonstrate this approach on a challenging multi-task semantic parsing benchmark, where the model must translate natural language into formal meaning representations. Experiments show that incorporating the taxonomical encodings leads to significant performance improvements compared to baseline neural semantic parsing models.

The paper also discusses ways to make the model more "white-box" - that is, more interpretable and transparent in terms of its internal reasoning. This is an important consideration for real-world deployment of such systems.

Critical Analysis

The authors make a compelling case for the benefits of using extremely rich symbolic meaning representations in neural semantic parsing. The taxonomical encodings appear to capture nuanced semantic relationships that are often missed by more conventional approaches.

However, a potential limitation is the scalability and generalizability of this approach. The taxonomical structures require significant manual curation and may not generalize well to open-ended language domains beyond the specific benchmarks evaluated.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a deep analysis of the types of errors the model makes or the specific linguistic phenomena it struggles with. Further investigation into the model's failure modes could yield valuable insights for future research.

Another area for exploration is the integration of this framework with other emerging techniques, such as the use of structured neural-symbolic reasoning. Combining rich semantic representations with more flexible, compositional reasoning mechanisms could lead to even more powerful language understanding capabilities.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents a promising direction for advancing neural semantic parsing by leveraging extremely detailed symbolic meaning representations. The taxonomical encodings demonstrate the potential benefits of incorporating richer semantic information into language models.

While there are still challenges to be addressed, such as scalability and interpretability, the research opens up exciting avenues for future work in this space. Continued exploration of these ideas could lead to significant improvements in the field of natural language understanding, with far-reaching applications in areas like conversational AI, information retrieval, and knowledge-based reasoning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ”—

How well do distributed representations convey contextual lexical semantics: a Thesis Proposal

Zhu Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Modern neural networks (NNs), trained on extensive raw sentence data, construct distributed representations by compressing individual words into dense, continuous, high-dimensional vectors. These representations are specifically designed to capture the varied meanings, including ambiguity, of word occurrences within context. In this thesis, our objective is to examine the efficacy of distributed representations from NNs in encoding lexical meaning. Initially, we identify four sources of ambiguity - homonymy, polysemy, semantic roles, and multifunctionality - based on the relatedness and similarity of meanings influenced by context. Subsequently, we aim to evaluate these sources by collecting or constructing multilingual datasets, leveraging various language models, and employing linguistic analysis tools.

Read more

6/4/2024

The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Models

The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Models

Kiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Yibo Jiang, Victor Veitch

YC

0

Reddit

0

Understanding how semantic meaning is encoded in the representation spaces of large language models is a fundamental problem in interpretability. In this paper, we study the two foundational questions in this area. First, how are categorical concepts, such as {'mammal', 'bird', 'reptile', 'fish'}, represented? Second, how are hierarchical relations between concepts encoded? For example, how is the fact that 'dog' is a kind of 'mammal' encoded? We show how to extend the linear representation hypothesis to answer these questions. We find a remarkably simple structure: simple categorical concepts are represented as simplices, hierarchically related concepts are orthogonal in a sense we make precise, and (in consequence) complex concepts are represented as polytopes constructed from direct sums of simplices, reflecting the hierarchical structure. We validate these theoretical results on the Gemma large language model, estimating representations for 957 hierarchically related concepts using data from WordNet.

Read more

6/4/2024

šŸŽÆ

Learning Visual-Semantic Subspace Representations for Propositional Reasoning

Gabriel Moreira, Alexander Hauptmann, Manuel Marques, Jo~ao Paulo Costeira

YC

0

Reddit

0

Learning representations that capture rich semantic relationships and accommodate propositional calculus poses a significant challenge. Existing approaches are either contrastive, lacking theoretical guarantees, or fall short in effectively representing the partial orders inherent to rich visual-semantic hierarchies. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for learning visual representations that not only conform to a specified semantic structure but also facilitate probabilistic propositional reasoning. Our approach is based on a new nuclear norm-based loss. We show that its minimum encodes the spectral geometry of the semantics in a subspace lattice, where logical propositions can be represented by projection operators.

Read more

5/28/2024

Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic

New!Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic

Kwanghee Choi, Ankita Pasad, Tomohiko Nakamura, Satoru Fukayama, Karen Livescu, Shinji Watanabe

YC

0

Reddit

0

Self-supervised speech models (S3Ms) have become an effective backbone for speech applications. Various analyses suggest that S3Ms encode linguistic properties. In this work, we seek a more fine-grained analysis of the word-level linguistic properties encoded in S3Ms. Specifically, we curate a novel dataset of near homophone (phonetically similar) and synonym (semantically similar) word pairs and measure the similarities between S3M word representation pairs. Our study reveals that S3M representations consistently and significantly exhibit more phonetic than semantic similarity. Further, we question whether widely used intent classification datasets such as Fluent Speech Commands and Snips Smartlights are adequate for measuring semantic abilities. Our simple baseline, using only the word identity, surpasses S3M-based models. This corroborates our findings and suggests that high scores on these datasets do not necessarily guarantee the presence of semantic content.

Read more

6/14/2024