The Multiple Dimensions of Spuriousness in Machine Learning

Published 12/2/2024 by Samuel J. Bell, Skyler Wang

Overview

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research often involves finding patterns and correlations in data.
However, this approach can be vulnerable to capturing unintended or spurious correlations.
Researchers are increasingly interested in understanding and addressing this issue of spuriousness in machine learning.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) systems often work by finding patterns and correlations in large datasets. This allows them to automatically discover relationships and make predictions. However, this approach can sometimes lead to the identification of spurious correlations - relationships that appear in the data but don't actually reflect any meaningful underlying connection.

Researchers are becoming more interested in understanding and addressing this issue of spuriousness in machine learning. Rather than just looking for any correlations, they want to ensure the models are only using relevant, generalizable, human-like, and harmless patterns. This goes beyond just looking at whether a correlation is causal or not.

By examining how researchers think about and address the challenge of spuriousness, we can better understand the complexities involved in developing responsible and robust AI systems.

Key Findings

Spuriousness in machine learning goes beyond the simple causal/non-causal distinction.
Researchers conceptualize multiple dimensions of spuriousness, including relevance, generalizability, human-likeness, and harmfulness.
The different ways researchers interpret and approach the issue of spuriousness can meaningfully influence the development of machine learning technologies.

Technical Explanation

This paper examines how machine learning (ML) researchers make sense of the concept of "spuriousness" - when an observed correlation in data does not reflect a meaningful underlying relationship.

While the conventional statistical definition of spuriousness refers to non-causal observations due to coincidence or confounding variables, the authors find that ML researchers have expanded this understanding. They identify four key dimensions of spuriousness in ML:

Relevance: Models should only use correlations that are relevant to the specific task at hand, not just any patterns that happen to be present in the data.
Generalizability: Models should only rely on correlations that will generalize to unseen data, not just fit the training data.
Human-likeness: Models should only use correlations that a human would also recognize as meaningful to perform the same task.
Harmfulness: Models should avoid using correlations that could lead to harmful or undesirable outcomes, even if they appear statistically significant.

By examining how this fundamental challenge is interpreted and negotiated within ML research contexts, the authors contribute to ongoing discussions about responsible practices in AI development.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a nuanced perspective on the issue of spuriousness in machine learning, going beyond the simplistic causal/non-causal dichotomy. By highlighting the multiple dimensions that researchers consider, it underscores the complexities involved in ensuring ML models only learn and rely on meaningful, generalizable, and safe patterns.

However, the paper does not delve into specific techniques or methodologies that researchers employ to address spuriousness. It would be helpful to see more concrete examples of how these different dimensions of spuriousness are identified and mitigated in practice.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the research community's understanding of spuriousness, but does not extensively discuss the potential real-world impacts of spurious correlations being incorporated into deployed AI systems. Further exploration of the societal implications would strengthen the analysis.

Overall, this paper offers a valuable conceptual framework for understanding the evolving perspectives on spuriousness in machine learning. Continued research and discussion in this area are crucial for developing responsible and robust AI technologies.

Conclusion

This paper explores how the concept of "spuriousness" is understood and addressed within machine learning research. It goes beyond the traditional statistical definition to identify multiple dimensions, including relevance, generalizability, human-likeness, and harmfulness.

By examining these nuanced interpretations, the authors shed light on the complexities involved in ensuring machine learning models only capture meaningful, generalizable, and safe patterns in data. This work contributes to ongoing debates about responsible practices in AI development, underscoring the importance of carefully scrutinizing the patterns that AI systems learn and rely upon.

Full paper

Loading PDF viewer...

Read original: arXiv:2411.04696

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Spurious Correlations in Machine Learning: A Survey

Wenqian Ye, Guangtao Zheng, Xu Cao, Yunsheng Ma, Aidong Zhang

Machine learning systems are known to be sensitive to spurious correlations between non-essential features of the inputs (e.g., background, texture, and secondary objects) and the corresponding labels. These features and their correlations with the labels are known as spurious because they tend to change with shifts in real-world data distributions, which can negatively impact the model's generalization and robustness. In this paper, we provide a review of this issue, along with a taxonomy of current state-of-the-art methods for addressing spurious correlations in machine learning models. Additionally, we summarize existing datasets, benchmarks, and metrics to aid future research. The paper concludes with a discussion of the recent advancements and future challenges in this field, aiming to provide valuable insights for researchers in the related domains.

5/20/2024

Revisiting Spurious Correlation in Domain Generalization

Bin Qin, Jiangmeng Li, Yi Li, Xuesong Wu, Yupeng Wang, Wenwen Qiang, Jianwen Cao

Without loss of generality, existing machine learning techniques may learn spurious correlation dependent on the domain, which exacerbates the generalization of models in out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. To address this issue, recent works build a structural causal model (SCM) to describe the causality within data generation process, thereby motivating methods to avoid the learning of spurious correlation by models. However, from the machine learning viewpoint, such a theoretical analysis omits the nuanced difference between the data generation process and representation learning process, resulting in that the causal analysis based on the former cannot well adapt to the latter. To this end, we explore to build a SCM for representation learning process and further conduct a thorough analysis of the mechanisms underlying spurious correlation. We underscore that adjusting erroneous covariates introduces bias, thus necessitating the correct selection of spurious correlation mechanisms based on practical application scenarios. In this regard, we substantiate the correctness of the proposed SCM and further propose to control confounding bias in OOD generalization by introducing a propensity score weighted estimator, which can be integrated into any existing OOD method as a plug-and-play module. The empirical results comprehensively demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on synthetic and large-scale real OOD datasets.

6/18/2024

Spuriousness-Aware Meta-Learning for Learning Robust Classifiers

Guangtao Zheng, Wenqian Ye, Aidong Zhang

Spurious correlations are brittle associations between certain attributes of inputs and target variables, such as the correlation between an image background and an object class. Deep image classifiers often leverage them for predictions, leading to poor generalization on the data where the correlations do not hold. Mitigating the impact of spurious correlations is crucial towards robust model generalization, but it often requires annotations of the spurious correlations in data -- a strong assumption in practice. In this paper, we propose a novel learning framework based on meta-learning, termed SPUME -- SPUriousness-aware MEta-learning, to train an image classifier to be robust to spurious correlations. We design the framework to iteratively detect and mitigate the spurious correlations that the classifier excessively relies on for predictions. To achieve this, we first propose to utilize a pre-trained vision-language model to extract text-format attributes from images. These attributes enable us to curate data with various class-attribute correlations, and we formulate a novel metric to measure the degree of these correlations' spuriousness. Then, to mitigate the reliance on spurious correlations, we propose a meta-learning strategy in which the support (training) sets and query (test) sets in tasks are curated with different spurious correlations that have high degrees of spuriousness. By meta-training the classifier on these spuriousness-aware meta-learning tasks, our classifier can learn to be invariant to the spurious correlations. We demonstrate that our method is robust to spurious correlations without knowing them a priori and achieves the best on five benchmark datasets with different robustness measures.

6/18/2024

Out of spuriousity: Improving robustness to spurious correlations without group annotations

Phuong Quynh Le, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert

Machine learning models are known to learn spurious correlations, i.e., features having strong relations with class labels but no causal relation. Relying on those correlations leads to poor performance in the data groups without these correlations and poor generalization ability. To improve the robustness of machine learning models to spurious correlations, we propose an approach to extract a subnetwork from a fully trained network that does not rely on spurious correlations. The subnetwork is found by the assumption that data points with the same spurious attribute will be close to each other in the representation space when training with ERM, then we employ supervised contrastive loss in a novel way to force models to unlearn the spurious connections. The increase in the worst-group performance of our approach contributes to strengthening the hypothesis that there exists a subnetwork in a fully trained dense network that is responsible for using only invariant features in classification tasks, therefore erasing the influence of spurious features even in the setup of multi spurious attributes and no prior knowledge of attributes labels.

7/23/2024