Model Merging and Safety Alignment: One Bad Model Spoils the Bunch
Overview
- This paper explores the risks of merging multiple machine learning models, particularly in the context of safety-critical systems.
- The authors argue that even a single "bad" model can undermine the safety and reliability of a merged model, leading to unintended and potentially harmful behaviors.
- The paper examines the challenges of ensuring safety alignment across diverse models and proposes strategies for mitigating these risks.
Plain English Explanation
When you combine multiple machine learning models, there's a risk that a single "bad" model can spoil the whole bunch. Even if most of the models are well-behaved and safe, the inclusion of a single problematic model can compromise the safety and reliability of the merged system.
This is a particular concern in safety-critical applications, where the consequences of model failures can be severe. The authors of this paper explore the challenges of ensuring that the combined model remains safe and aligned with intended goals, even when individual components may have flaws or undesirable behaviors.
They propose strategies for mitigating these risks, such as careful vetting of individual models, robust testing procedures, and techniques for aligning the objectives and behaviors of the merged system. By addressing these challenges, the researchers aim to help ensure that model merging can be done safely and reliably, particularly in high-stakes domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the risks associated with merging multiple machine learning models, particularly in the context of safety-critical applications. The authors argue that even a single "bad" model - one that exhibits undesirable or unsafe behaviors - can undermine the safety and reliability of the merged system.
The researchers explore the challenges of ensuring safety alignment across diverse models, which may have been trained on different data, optimized for different objectives, or developed by different teams. They propose strategies for mitigating these risks, including:
- Rigorous vetting and testing of individual models before merging
- Techniques for aligning the objectives and behaviors of the merged system
- Robust monitoring and control mechanisms to detect and respond to safety breaches
The paper also discusses the importance of comprehensive testing and validation procedures to ensure that the combined model behaves as intended, even in edge cases or unexpected situations.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the risks of model merging, particularly in safety-critical domains. The authors make a compelling case that even a single "bad" model can have a disproportionate impact on the safety and reliability of a merged system.
However, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific types of safety issues that can arise, as well as the potential sources of model misalignment. Additionally, the proposed mitigation strategies could be further elaborated, with more details on their implementation and effectiveness.
The paper also does not address the practical challenges of model vetting and alignment, such as the computational and technical resources required, or the challenges of aligning models with diverse architectures and training regimes.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable starting point for understanding the risks of model merging and the importance of safety alignment. However, more research is needed to develop robust and scalable solutions to these challenges, particularly as machine learning systems become increasingly complex and ubiquitous.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the significant risks associated with merging machine learning models, particularly in safety-critical applications. The authors make a strong case that even a single "bad" model can undermine the safety and reliability of a merged system, leading to unintended and potentially harmful behaviors.
By addressing the challenges of ensuring safety alignment across diverse models, the researchers aim to help developers and operators of safety-critical systems mitigate these risks. The proposed strategies, such as rigorous vetting and testing, objective alignment, and robust monitoring, offer promising approaches for enhancing the safety and reliability of model merging.
As machine learning systems become increasingly complex and widely deployed, the insights and recommendations provided in this paper will be crucial for ensuring that the benefits of these technologies are realized while the risks are effectively managed. Continued research and innovation in this area will be essential for building a future where AI systems can be trusted to operate safely and reliably, even in high-stakes environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
0
Model Merging and Safety Alignment: One Bad Model Spoils the Bunch
Hasan Abed Al Kader Hammoud, Umberto Michieli, Fabio Pizzati, Philip Torr, Adel Bibi, Bernard Ghanem, Mete Ozay
Merging Large Language Models (LLMs) is a cost-effective technique for combining multiple expert LLMs into a single versatile model, retaining the expertise of the original ones. However, current approaches often overlook the importance of safety alignment during merging, leading to highly misaligned models. This work investigates the effects of model merging on alignment. We evaluate several popular model merging techniques, demonstrating that existing methods do not only transfer domain expertise but also propagate misalignment. We propose a simple two-step approach to address this problem: (i) generating synthetic safety and domain-specific data, and (ii) incorporating these generated data into the optimization process of existing data-aware model merging techniques. This allows us to treat alignment as a skill that can be maximized in the resulting merged LLM. Our experiments illustrate the effectiveness of integrating alignment-related data during merging, resulting in models that excel in both domain expertise and alignment.
Read more6/21/2024
0
New!Combining Domain and Alignment Vectors to Achieve Better Knowledge-Safety Trade-offs in LLMs
Megh Thakkar, Yash More, Quentin Fournier, Matthew Riemer, Pin-Yu Chen, Amal Zouaq, Payel Das, Sarath Chandar
There is a growing interest in training domain-expert LLMs that excel in specific technical fields compared to their general-purpose instruction-tuned counterparts. However, these expert models often experience a loss in their safety abilities in the process, making them capable of generating harmful content. As a solution, we introduce an efficient and effective merging-based alignment method called textsc{MergeAlign} that interpolates the domain and alignment vectors, creating safer domain-specific models while preserving their utility. We apply textsc{MergeAlign} on Llama3 variants that are experts in medicine and finance, obtaining substantial alignment improvements with minimal to no degradation on domain-specific benchmarks. We study the impact of model merging through model similarity metrics and contributions of individual models being merged. We hope our findings open new research avenues and inspire more efficient development of safe expert LLMs.
Read more11/12/2024
0
ABC Align: Large Language Model Alignment for Safety & Accuracy
Gareth Seneque, Lap-Hang Ho, Ariel Kuperman, Nafise Erfanian Saeedi, Jeffrey Molendijk
Alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) remains an unsolved problem. Human preferences are highly distributed and can be captured at multiple levels of abstraction, from the individual to diverse populations. Organisational preferences, represented by standards and principles, are defined to mitigate reputational risk or meet legislative obligations. In this paper, we present ABC Align, a novel alignment methodology for LLMs that enables integration of the standards and preferences of a large media organisation into the LLM itself. We combine a set of data and methods that build on recent breakthroughs in synthetic data generation, preference optimisation, and post-training model quantisation. Our unified approach mitigates bias and improves accuracy, while preserving reasoning capability, as measured against standard benchmarks.
Read more8/2/2024
🖼️
0
Aligners: Decoupling LLMs and Alignment
Lilian Ngweta, Mayank Agarwal, Subha Maity, Alex Gittens, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail Yurochkin
Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be aligned with human expectations to ensure their safety and utility in most applications. Alignment is challenging, costly, and needs to be repeated for every LLM and alignment criterion. We propose to decouple LLMs and alignment by training aligner models that can be used to align any LLM for a given criteria on an as-needed basis, thus also reducing the potential negative impacts of alignment on performance. Our recipe for training the aligner models solely relies on synthetic data generated with a (prompted) LLM and can be easily adjusted for a variety of alignment criteria. We use the same synthetic data to train inspectors, binary miss-alignment classification models to guide a squad of multiple aligners. Our empirical results demonstrate consistent improvements when applying aligner squad to various LLMs, including chat-aligned models, across several instruction-following and red-teaming datasets.
Read more10/7/2024