Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries

    Read original: arXiv:2409.12640 - Published 9/23/2024 by Kiran Vodrahalli, Santiago Ontanon, Nilesh Tripuraneni, Kelvin Xu, Sanil Jain, Rakesh Shivanna, Jeffrey Hui, Nishanth Dikkala, Mehran Kazemi, Bahare Fatemi and 14 others
    Total Score

    15

    Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries is a research paper that explores new evaluation tasks and methods for assessing the performance of language models on long-context understanding.
    • The paper proposes a novel framework called Michelangelo that goes beyond standard "haystack" benchmarks and focuses on evaluating language models' ability to grasp the latent structure and semantics of long-form text.
    • Key aspects include designing new evaluation tasks, leveraging latent representations, and enabling fine-grained analysis of language model capabilities.

    Plain English Explanation

    The paper introduces a new approach called Michelangelo for evaluating how well language models can understand and reason about long passages of text. Traditional benchmarks often rely on short, isolated snippets of text, which may not fully capture a model's ability to grasp the deeper meaning and structure of longer, more complex documents.

    Michelangelo aims to move beyond these "haystack" scenarios and design more challenging evaluation tasks that require the model to extract and leverage the latent, semantic relationships within the text. For example, one task might ask the model to identify the key arguments or storyline that spans multiple paragraphs, rather than just answering questions about individual sentences.

    By focusing on the model's ability to capture the latent structure of the text, the researchers hope to gain a more nuanced understanding of the model's true language understanding capabilities. This could reveal strengths or weaknesses that are obscured by standard benchmarks, ultimately helping to drive progress in building more sophisticated and versatile language AI.

    Technical Explanation

    The core innovation of the Michelangelo framework is its focus on evaluating language models' ability to grasp the latent structure and semantics of long-form text, rather than just their performance on isolated, short-context tasks.

    The paper introduces a suite of new evaluation tasks that go beyond traditional "haystack" benchmarks. These tasks are designed to probe the model's capacity to:

    To enable this level of analysis, the researchers propose new evaluation metrics and methods that go beyond simple accuracy or perplexity scores. These include techniques for probing the model's internal representations, tracking its reasoning process, and measuring its ability to generalize beyond the training data.

    By focusing on the model's capacity to grasp the latent structure of long-form text, the Michelangelo framework aims to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced assessment of language understanding capabilities. This could help drive the development of more powerful and versatile language AI systems.

    Critical Analysis

    The Michelangelo framework represents an important step forward in evaluating language models beyond the limitations of traditional "haystack" benchmarks. By shifting the focus to long-context understanding and latent structure, the researchers are addressing a key gap in existing evaluation methods.

    However, the paper acknowledges that designing effective evaluation tasks for this domain is inherently challenging. Accurately measuring a model's ability to grasp complex, high-level semantic relationships requires carefully crafted test sets and evaluation metrics. The researchers note that further research is needed to refine and validate these methods.

    Additionally, while the paper highlights the potential benefits of the Michelangelo approach, it does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other long-context evaluation frameworks, such as Babilon or Loogle. A more thorough benchmarking study could help establish the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

    Overall, the Michelangelo framework represents an important contribution to the field of language model evaluation. By shifting the focus to long-context understanding and latent structure, it has the potential to drive significant progress in building more sophisticated and capable language AI systems. However, continued research and refinement will be necessary to fully realize the potential of this approach.

    Conclusion

    The Michelangelo paper introduces a novel framework for evaluating language models on their ability to understand and reason about the latent structure and semantics of long-form text. By moving beyond traditional "haystack" benchmarks, the researchers aim to gain a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment of language understanding capabilities.

    The key innovations of Michelangelo include the design of new evaluation tasks, the use of latent representations, and the development of fine-grained analysis techniques. This approach has the potential to reveal important insights about the strengths and limitations of current language models, ultimately leading to the development of more powerful and versatile AI systems.

    While the paper acknowledges the inherent challenges in this domain, the Michelangelo framework represents an important step forward in the field of language model evaluation. As researchers continue to refine and validate these methods, they may pave the way for significant advancements in natural language understanding and reasoning.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries
    Total Score

    15

    Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries

    Kiran Vodrahalli, Santiago Ontanon, Nilesh Tripuraneni, Kelvin Xu, Sanil Jain, Rakesh Shivanna, Jeffrey Hui, Nishanth Dikkala, Mehran Kazemi, Bahare Fatemi, Rohan Anil, Ethan Dyer, Siamak Shakeri, Roopali Vij, Harsh Mehta, Vinay Ramasesh, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Yifeng Lu, Orhan Firat, Angeliki Lazaridou, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Nithya Attaluri, Kate Olszewska

    We introduce Michelangelo: a minimal, synthetic, and unleaked long-context reasoning evaluation for large language models which is also easy to automatically score. This evaluation is derived via a novel, unifying framework for evaluations over arbitrarily long contexts which measure the model's ability to do more than retrieve a single piece of information from its context. The central idea of the Latent Structure Queries framework (LSQ) is to construct tasks which require a model to ``chisel away'' the irrelevant information in the context, revealing a latent structure in the context. To verify a model's understanding of this latent structure, we query the model for details of the structure. Using LSQ, we produce three diagnostic long-context evaluations across code and natural-language domains intended to provide a stronger signal of long-context language model capabilities. We perform evaluations on several state-of-the-art models and demonstrate both that a) the proposed evaluations are high-signal and b) that there is significant room for improvement in synthesizing long-context information.

    Read more

    9/23/2024

    Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA
    Total Score

    0

    Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA

    Minzheng Wang, Longze Chen, Cheng Fu, Shengyi Liao, Xinghua Zhang, Bingli Wu, Haiyang Yu, Nan Xu, Lei Zhang, Run Luo, Yunshui Li, Min Yang, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li

    Long-context modeling capabilities have garnered widespread attention, leading to the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) with ultra-context windows. Meanwhile, benchmarks for evaluating long-context LLMs are gradually catching up. However, existing benchmarks employ irrelevant noise texts to artificially extend the length of test cases, diverging from the real-world scenarios of long-context applications. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel long-context benchmark, Loong, aligning with realistic scenarios through extended multi-document question answering (QA). Unlike typical document QA, in Loong's test cases, each document is relevant to the final answer, ignoring any document will lead to the failure of the answer. Furthermore, Loong introduces four types of tasks with a range of context lengths: Spotlight Locating, Comparison, Clustering, and Chain of Reasoning, to facilitate a more realistic and comprehensive evaluation of long-context understanding. Extensive experiments indicate that existing long-context language models still exhibit considerable potential for enhancement. Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) achieves poor performance, demonstrating that Loong can reliably assess the model's long-context modeling capabilities.

    Read more

    10/4/2024

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?

    Jiaqi Li, Mengmeng Wang, Zilong Zheng, Muhan Zhang

    Large language models (LLMs), despite their impressive performance in various language tasks, are typically limited to processing texts within context-window size. This limitation has spurred significant research efforts to enhance LLMs' long-context understanding with high-quality long-sequence benchmarks. However, prior datasets in this regard suffer from shortcomings, such as short context length compared to the context window of modern LLMs; outdated documents that have data leakage problems; and an emphasis on short dependency tasks rather than long dependency tasks. In this paper, we present LooGLE, a Long Context Generic Language Evaluation benchmark for LLMs' long context understanding. LooGLE features relatively new documents post-2022, with over 24,000 tokens per document and 6,000 newly generated questions spanning diverse domains. Human annotators meticulously crafted more than 1,100 high-quality question-answer pairs to meet the long dependency requirements. These pairs underwent thorough cross-validation, yielding the most precise assessment of LLMs' long dependency capabilities. The evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs on LooGLE revealed key findings: (i) commercial models outperformed open-sourced models; (ii) LLMs excelled in short dependency tasks like short question-answering and cloze tasks but struggled with more intricate long dependency tasks; (iii) in-context learning and chaining thoughts offered only marginal improvements; (iv) retrieval-based techniques demonstrated substantial benefits for short question-answering, while strategies for extending context window length had limited impact on long context understanding. As such, LooGLE not only provides a systematic and comprehensive evaluation schema on long-context LLMs, but also sheds light on future development of enhanced models towards true long-context understanding.

    Read more

    9/9/2024

    Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?
    Total Score

    0

    Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?

    Jinhyuk Lee, Anthony Chen, Zhuyun Dai, Dheeru Dua, Devendra Singh Sachan, Michael Boratko, Yi Luan, S'ebastien M. R. Arnold, Vincent Perot, Siddharth Dalmia, Hexiang Hu, Xudong Lin, Panupong Pasupat, Aida Amini, Jeremy R. Cole, Sebastian Riedel, Iftekhar Naim, Ming-Wei Chang, Kelvin Guu

    Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. Leveraging LCLMs' ability to natively ingest and process entire corpora of information offers numerous advantages. It enhances user-friendliness by eliminating the need for specialized knowledge of tools, provides robust end-to-end modeling that minimizes cascading errors in complex pipelines, and allows for the application of sophisticated prompting techniques across the entire system. To assess this paradigm shift, we introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks. However, LCLMs still face challenges in areas like compositional reasoning that are required in SQL-like tasks. Notably, prompting strategies significantly influence performance, emphasizing the need for continued research as context lengths grow. Overall, LOFT provides a rigorous testing ground for LCLMs, showcasing their potential to supplant existing paradigms and tackle novel tasks as model capabilities scale.

    Read more

    6/21/2024