Mentions of Prejudice in News Media -- An International Comparison

2304.01596

YC

3

Reddit

0

Published 5/6/2024 by David Rozado

šŸ·ļø

Abstract

Previous research has identified a post-2010 sharp increase of terms used to denounce prejudice (i.e. racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, etc.) in U.S. and U.K. news media content. Here, we extend previous analysis to an international sample of news media organizations. Thus, we quantify the prevalence of prejudice-denouncing terms and social justice associated terminology (diversity, inclusion, equality, etc.) in over 98 million news and opinion articles across 124 popular news media outlets from 36 countries representing 6 different world regions: English-speaking West, continental Europe, Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, Persian Gulf region and Asia. We find that the post-2010 increasing prominence in news media of the studied terminology is not circumscribed to the U.S. and the U.K. but rather appears to be a mostly global phenomenon starting in the first half of the 2010s decade in pioneering countries yet largely prevalent around the globe post-2015. However, different world regions' news media emphasize distinct types of prejudice with varying degrees of intensity. We find no evidence of U.S. news media having been first in the world in increasing the frequency of prejudice coverage in their content. The large degree of temporal synchronicity with which the studied set of terms increased in news media across a vast majority of countries raises important questions about the root causes driving this phenomenon.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This research examines the increasing prevalence of terms used to denounce prejudice (e.g., racism, sexism, homophobia) and social justice-related terminology (e.g., diversity, inclusion, equality) in news media content across 36 countries and 6 world regions.
  • The study quantifies the usage of these terms in over 98 million news and opinion articles from 124 popular news outlets.
  • The findings suggest that the post-2010 rise in prejudice-denouncing and social justice terminology is not limited to the U.S. and U.K. but is a largely global phenomenon, with varying degrees of emphasis across different regions.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers investigated the use of certain words and phrases in news articles from around the world. These words and phrases are often used to call out or condemn prejudice, such as racism, sexism, and discrimination against specific groups. The researchers also looked at words and phrases related to social justice, like "diversity," "inclusion," and "equality."

The researchers found that the use of these types of terms has increased significantly in news media since around 2010, and this trend is not just limited to the United States and United Kingdom. It appears to be a global phenomenon, with news outlets in different regions of the world emphasizing different types of prejudice to varying degrees.

Interestingly, the researchers did not find evidence that U.S. news media were the first in the world to increase their coverage of prejudice-related issues. The widespread and synchronous increase in this type of language across many countries raises important questions about what might be driving this shift in news reporting. It could be related to broader societal changes and debates around issues of discrimination and social justice.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a quantitative analysis of the prevalence of prejudice-denouncing terms (e.g., racism, sexism, homophobia) and social justice-associated terminology (e.g., diversity, inclusion, equality) in news and opinion articles from 124 popular media outlets across 36 countries and 6 world regions.

They compiled a corpus of over 98 million articles published between 2000 and 2020 and used computational text analysis techniques to measure the frequency of the studied terms. The analysis revealed a sharp increase in the usage of these terms starting in the early 2010s, which was not limited to the U.S. and U.K. but rather appeared to be a global phenomenon.

The researchers found that different regions emphasized distinct types of prejudice with varying degrees of intensity. For example, news media in the Persian Gulf region focused more on anti-Semitism, while outlets in sub-Saharan Africa placed greater emphasis on racism. Contrary to popular perception, the researchers did not find evidence that U.S. news media were the first in the world to increase their coverage of prejudice-related issues.

The high degree of temporal synchronicity in the increased usage of the studied terminology across a vast majority of countries raises important questions about the underlying drivers of this phenomenon. It could be linked to broader societal shifts and debates around diversity, inclusion, and social justice, which may have influenced news reporting practices globally.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their study does not delve into the nuances of how the identified terminology is used in news articles, such as the context, framing, and overall sentiment. Further research would be needed to better understand the implications of the observed trends and their connection to real-world events and societal changes.

Additionally, the analysis is limited to a specific set of terms related to prejudice and social justice, and it is possible that other relevant terminology was not captured. The researchers also note that the news media outlets included in the study may not be fully representative of the global news landscape, as they focused on popular and influential outlets.

While the findings suggest a widespread and synchronous increase in the usage of the studied terminology, it is important to consider potential confounding factors, such as changes in journalistic practices, editorial policies, and audience preferences, which could also contribute to the observed trends.

Conclusion

This research provides valuable insights into the global evolution of news media coverage related to prejudice, discrimination, and social justice issues. The study's key finding is that the post-2010 increase in the use of prejudice-denouncing and social justice-associated terminology is not exclusive to the U.S. and U.K. but rather appears to be a largely global phenomenon, with varying degrees of emphasis across different world regions.

The synchronous nature of this trend across many countries raises intriguing questions about the underlying drivers, which could be linked to broader societal shifts and debates around diversity, inclusion, and social justice. Further research is needed to better understand the nuances and implications of these changes in news reporting practices and their potential impact on public discourse and societal perceptions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Inclusive content reduces racial and gender biases, yet non-inclusive content dominates popular media outlets

Inclusive content reduces racial and gender biases, yet non-inclusive content dominates popular media outlets

Nouar AlDahoul, Hazem Ibrahim, Minsu Park, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki

YC

0

Reddit

0

Images are often termed as representations of perceived reality. As such, racial and gender biases in popular media imagery could play a vital role in shaping people's perceptions of society. While inquiries into such biases have examined the frequency at which different racial and gender groups appear in different forms of media, the literature still lacks a large-scale longitudinal study that further examines the manner in which these groups are portrayed. To fill this gap, we examine three media forms, namely fashion magazines, movie posters, and advertisements. To do so, we collect a large dataset comprising over 300,000 images spanning over five decades and utilize state-of-the-art machine learning models to not only classify race and gender but also identify the posture, emotional state, and body composition of the person featured in each image. We find that racial minorities appear far less frequently than their White counterparts, and when they do appear, they are portrayed less prominently and tend to convey more negative emotions. We also find that women are more likely to be portrayed with their full bodies in images, whereas men are more frequently presented with their faces. This disparity exemplifies face-ism, where emphasizing faces over bodies has been linked to perceptions of higher competence and intelligence. Finally, through a series of survey experiments, we show that exposure to inclusive content-rather than racially and gender-homogenized content -- significantly reduces perception biases towards minorities in areas such as household income, hiring merit, beauty standards, leadership positions, and the representation of women in the workplace. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that racial and gender biases in media continue to be an ongoing problem that may exacerbate existing stereotypes.

Read more

5/13/2024

Global News Synchrony and Diversity During the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Global News Synchrony and Diversity During the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Xi Chen, Scott A. Hale, David Jurgens, Mattia Samory, Ethan Zuckerman, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz

YC

0

Reddit

0

News coverage profoundly affects how countries and individuals behave in international relations. Yet, we have little empirical evidence of how news coverage varies across countries. To enable studies of global news coverage, we develop an efficient computational methodology that comprises three components: (i) a transformer model to estimate multilingual news similarity; (ii) a global event identification system that clusters news based on a similarity network of news articles; and (iii) measures of news synchrony across countries and news diversity within a country, based on country-specific distributions of news coverage of the global events. Each component achieves state-of-the art performance, scaling seamlessly to massive datasets of millions of news articles. We apply the methodology to 60 million news articles published globally between January 1 and June 30, 2020, across 124 countries and 10 languages, detecting 4357 news events. We identify the factors explaining diversity and synchrony of news coverage across countries. Our study reveals that news media tend to cover a more diverse set of events in countries with larger Internet penetration, more official languages, larger religious diversity, higher economic inequality, and larger populations. Coverage of news events is more synchronized between countries that not only actively participate in commercial and political relations -- such as, pairs of countries with high bilateral trade volume, and countries that belong to the NATO military alliance or BRICS group of major emerging economies -- but also countries that share certain traits: an official language, high GDP, and high democracy indices.

Read more

5/2/2024

A Computational Analysis of the Dehumanisation of Migrants from Syria and Ukraine in Slovene News Media

A Computational Analysis of the Dehumanisation of Migrants from Syria and Ukraine in Slovene News Media

Jaya Caporusso, Damar Hoogland, Mojca Brglez, Boshko Koloski, Matthew Purver, Senja Pollak

YC

0

Reddit

0

Dehumanisation involves the perception and or treatment of a social group's members as less than human. This phenomenon is rarely addressed with computational linguistic techniques. We adapt a recently proposed approach for English, making it easier to transfer to other languages and to evaluate, introducing a new sentiment resource, the use of zero-shot cross-lingual valence and arousal detection, and a new method for statistical significance testing. We then apply it to study attitudes to migration expressed in Slovene newspapers, to examine changes in the Slovene discourse on migration between the 2015-16 migration crisis following the war in Syria and the 2022-23 period following the war in Ukraine. We find that while this discourse became more negative and more intense over time, it is less dehumanising when specifically addressing Ukrainian migrants compared to others.

Read more

4/11/2024

U.S. Election Hardens Hate Universe

U.S. Election Hardens Hate Universe

Akshay Verma, Richard Sear, Neil F. Johnson

YC

0

Reddit

0

Local or national politics can trigger potentially dangerous hate in someone. But with a third of the world's population eligible to vote in elections in 2024 alone, we lack understanding of how individual-level hate multiplies up to hate behavior at the collective global scale. Here we show, based on the most recent U.S. election, that offline events are associated with a rapid adaptation of the global online hate universe that hardens (strengthens) both its network-of-networks structure and the 'flavors' of hate content that it collectively produces. Approximately 50 million potential voters in hate communities are drawn closer to each other and to the broad mainstream of approximately 2 billion others. It triggers new hate content at scale around immigration, ethnicity, and antisemitism that aligns with conspiracy theories about Jewish-led replacement before blending in hate around gender identity/sexual orientation, and religion. Telegram acts as a key hardening agent - yet is overlooked by U.S. Congressional hearings and new E.U. legislation. Because the hate universe has remained robust since 2020, anti-hate messaging surrounding not only upcoming elections but also other events like the war in Gaza, should pivot to blending multiple hate 'flavors' while targeting previously untouched social media structures.

Read more

5/2/2024