MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning
💬
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress in many general domains, but face significant challenges in the medical and healthcare fields.
- The unique challenges in medicine include specialized terminologies and complex knowledge reasoning.
- To address these issues, the researchers propose a novel framework called MedAgents that leverages LLM-based agents in a collaborative multi-round discussion.
- This training-free framework aims to enhance LLM proficiency and reasoning capabilities for the medical domain.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models have achieved impressive results in many areas, such as answering questions, summarizing information, and even generating creative content. However, when it comes to the medical and healthcare fields, LLMs face some unique challenges.
The medical domain has its own specialized terminologies and complex knowledge that can be difficult for LLMs to fully grasp. For example, understanding the intricate details of a medical diagnosis or the reasoning behind a treatment plan requires deep expertise that may not be easily captured by a general-purpose language model.
To address these challenges, the researchers developed a new framework called MedAgents. This framework brings together LLM-based agents, each playing a different role, such as a doctor, nurse, or pharmacist, to participate in a collaborative multi-round discussion about a medical topic or case. By engaging in this role-playing and discussion, the LLMs can learn from each other and develop a more nuanced understanding of the medical domain.
The MedAgents framework is designed to be training-free, meaning it can be applied to real-world scenarios without requiring extensive pre-training or fine-tuning of the LLMs. This makes it a potentially useful tool for enhancing the medical reasoning capabilities of language models in practical settings.
Technical Explanation
The MedAgents framework proposed in this paper aims to address the limitations of LLMs in the medical and healthcare domains. The framework involves a multi-disciplinary collaboration where LLM-based agents, each playing a different role, engage in a collaborative multi-round discussion to enhance the LLMs' proficiency and reasoning capabilities.
The framework consists of five critical steps:
- Gathering domain experts
- Proposing individual analyses
- Summarizing these analyses into a report
- Iterating over discussions until a consensus is reached
- Making a final decision
The researchers focus on the zero-shot setting, which means the framework can be applied without requiring any additional training of the LLMs. This makes it more practical for real-world deployment.
The experimental results reported in the paper demonstrate that the MedAgents framework is effective at harnessing the medical expertise within LLMs and extending their reasoning abilities. The framework was evaluated on nine datasets, including MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and six subtasks from the MMLU benchmark.
Critical Analysis
The MedAgents framework presented in this paper is a promising approach to enhancing the medical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. However, as with any research, there are some caveats and areas for further exploration.
One potential limitation is the reliance on domain experts to participate in the multi-round discussions. In real-world settings, it may not always be feasible to have access to a diverse group of medical professionals to engage in these collaborative sessions. Additionally, the paper does not address how the framework might scale to handle a large number of medical cases or queries.
Furthermore, the paper focuses on the zero-shot setting, which is advantageous for practical deployment, but it would be interesting to see how the framework might perform with additional fine-tuning or pre-training on medical data. Incorporating techniques from related research, such as proactive agent-based collaboration, clinical trial multi-agent systems, or adaptive collaboration strategies, could further enhance the framework's capabilities.
Overall, the MedAgents framework represents an important step forward in addressing the unique challenges faced by LLMs in the medical domain. The researchers' focus on collaborative, role-playing discussions is a promising direction for improving the medical reasoning abilities of these powerful language models.
Conclusion
The MedAgents framework proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in the medical and healthcare domains. By leveraging a collaborative, multi-round discussion format with LLM-based agents playing different roles, the framework aims to harness the medical expertise within these models and extend their reasoning capabilities.
The key strengths of the MedAgents framework include its training-free nature, making it applicable to real-world scenarios, and its demonstrated effectiveness in improving LLM performance across a range of medical-focused datasets. While the framework faces some potential limitations, such as the reliance on domain experts and scalability concerns, it represents an important step forward in addressing the unique challenges that LLMs encounter in the medical field.
As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, frameworks like MedAgents will become increasingly important for ensuring that powerful language models can be effectively leveraged to support and enhance medical decision-making and healthcare practices. The ongoing research in this area holds promise for transforming the way LLMs are applied in the critical domain of medicine.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
💬
0
MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning
Xiangru Tang, Anni Zou, Zhuosheng Zhang, Ziming Li, Yilun Zhao, Xingyao Zhang, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
Large language models (LLMs), despite their remarkable progress across various general domains, encounter significant barriers in medicine and healthcare. This field faces unique challenges such as domain-specific terminologies and reasoning over specialized knowledge. To address these issues, we propose MedAgents, a novel multi-disciplinary collaboration framework for the medical domain. MedAgents leverages LLM-based agents in a role-playing setting that participate in a collaborative multi-round discussion, thereby enhancing LLM proficiency and reasoning capabilities. This training-free framework encompasses five critical steps: gathering domain experts, proposing individual analyses, summarising these analyses into a report, iterating over discussions until a consensus is reached, and ultimately making a decision. Our work focuses on the zero-shot setting, which is applicable in real-world scenarios. Experimental results on nine datasets (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and six subtasks from MMLU) establish that our proposed MedAgents framework excels at mining and harnessing the medical expertise within LLMs, as well as extending its reasoning abilities. Our code can be found at https://github.com/gersteinlab/MedAgents.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Inquire, Interact, and Integrate: A Proactive Agent Collaborative Framework for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning
Zishan Gu, Fenglin Liu, Changchang Yin, Ping Zhang
The adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has attracted significant research interest. However, their performance in healthcare remains under-investigated and potentially limited, due to i) they lack rich domain-specific knowledge and medical reasoning skills; and ii) most state-of-the-art LLMs are unimodal, text-only models that cannot directly process multimodal inputs. To this end, we propose a multimodal medical collaborative reasoning framework textbf{MultiMedRes}, which incorporates a learner agent to proactively gain essential information from domain-specific expert models, to solve medical multimodal reasoning problems. Our method includes three steps: i) textbf{Inquire}: The learner agent first decomposes given complex medical reasoning problems into multiple domain-specific sub-problems; ii) textbf{Interact}: The agent then interacts with domain-specific expert models by repeating the ``ask-answer'' process to progressively obtain different domain-specific knowledge; iii) textbf{Integrate}: The agent finally integrates all the acquired domain-specific knowledge to accurately address the medical reasoning problem. We validate the effectiveness of our method on the task of difference visual question answering for X-ray images. The experiments demonstrate that our zero-shot prediction achieves state-of-the-art performance, and even outperforms the fully supervised methods. Besides, our approach can be incorporated into various LLMs and multimodal LLMs to significantly boost their performance.
Read more5/21/2024
0
ArgMed-Agents: Explainable Clinical Decision Reasoning with LLM Disscusion via Argumentation Schemes
Shengxin Hong, Liang Xiao, Xin Zhang, Jianxia Chen
There are two main barriers to using large language models (LLMs) in clinical reasoning. Firstly, while LLMs exhibit significant promise in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, their performance in complex reasoning and planning falls short of expectations. Secondly, LLMs use uninterpretable methods to make clinical decisions that are fundamentally different from the clinician's cognitive processes. This leads to user distrust. In this paper, we present a multi-agent framework called ArgMed-Agents, which aims to enable LLM-based agents to make explainable clinical decision reasoning through interaction. ArgMed-Agents performs self-argumentation iterations via Argumentation Scheme for Clinical Discussion (a reasoning mechanism for modeling cognitive processes in clinical reasoning), and then constructs the argumentation process as a directed graph representing conflicting relationships. Ultimately, use symbolic solver to identify a series of rational and coherent arguments to support decision. We construct a formal model of ArgMed-Agents and present conjectures for theoretical guarantees. ArgMed-Agents enables LLMs to mimic the process of clinical argumentative reasoning by generating explanations of reasoning in a self-directed manner. The setup experiments show that ArgMed-Agents not only improves accuracy in complex clinical decision reasoning problems compared to other prompt methods, but more importantly, it provides users with decision explanations that increase their confidence.
Read more6/24/2024
🤿
0
MedAide: Towards an Omni Medical Aide via Specialized LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration
Jinjie Wei, Dingkang Yang, Yanshu Li, Qingyao Xu, Zhaoyu Chen, Mingcheng Li, Yue Jiang, Xiaolu Hou, Lihua Zhang
Large Language Model (LLM)-driven interactive systems currently show potential promise in healthcare domains. Despite their remarkable capabilities, LLMs typically lack personalized recommendations and diagnosis analysis in sophisticated medical applications, causing hallucinations and performance bottlenecks. To address these challenges, this paper proposes MedAide, an LLM-based omni medical multi-agent collaboration framework for specialized healthcare services. Specifically, MedAide first performs query rewriting through retrieval-augmented generation to accomplish accurate medical intent understanding. Immediately, we devise a contextual encoder to obtain intent prototype embeddings, which are used to recognize fine-grained intents by similarity matching. According to the intent relevance, the activated agents collaborate effectively to provide integrated decision analysis. Extensive experiments are conducted on four medical benchmarks with composite intents. Experimental results from automated metrics and expert doctor evaluations show that MedAide outperforms current LLMs and improves their medical proficiency and strategic reasoning.
Read more10/18/2024