Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI

2311.02462

YC

89

Reddit

0

Published 6/7/2024 by Meredith Ringel Morris, Jascha Sohl-dickstein, Noah Fiedel, Tris Warkentin, Allan Dafoe, Aleksandra Faust, Clement Farabet, Shane Legg

🎯

Abstract

We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI. To develop our framework, we analyze existing definitions of AGI, and distill six principles that a useful ontology for AGI should satisfy. With these principles in mind, we propose Levels of AGI based on depth (performance) and breadth (generality) of capabilities, and reflect on how current systems fit into this ontology. We discuss the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models against these levels. Finally, we discuss how these levels of AGI interact with deployment considerations such as autonomy and risk, and emphasize the importance of carefully selecting Human-AI Interaction paradigms for responsible and safe deployment of highly capable AI systems.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • The paper proposes a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors.
  • The framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress towards AGI.
  • The authors analyze existing definitions of AGI and distill six principles that a useful ontology for AGI should satisfy.
  • The paper discusses the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models, and how these levels of AGI interact with deployment considerations such as autonomy and risk.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a way to categorize and compare different types of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems. AGI refers to AI that can perform a wide range of tasks at a human-like level, unlike current AI which is typically specialized for narrow tasks.

The framework the researchers propose has different "levels" of AGI based on the depth (performance) and breadth (generality) of the system's capabilities. This gives a common way to describe how advanced an AGI system is and how it compares to others. It also helps assess the potential risks and benefits as these systems become more capable.

The researchers looked at existing definitions of AGI and identified key principles that a good classification system should have. They then used these principles to develop their framework of AGI levels. The paper also discusses the challenges of creating benchmarks to accurately measure and compare the abilities of AGI systems as they become more advanced and autonomous.

Overall, the goal is to provide a clear and consistent way to understand and track progress towards more general and capable AI systems, and to help ensure they are developed and deployed responsibly.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by analyzing existing definitions and principles for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), distilling six key requirements for a useful AGI ontology:

  1. Capture the depth and breadth of capabilities
  2. Allow comparison between systems
  3. Provide a path to measure progress
  4. Enable assessment of risks and benefits
  5. Accommodate a range of deployment scenarios
  6. Remain flexible as AGI systems advance

Using these principles, the authors propose a framework with "Levels of AGI" based on performance (depth) and generality (breadth) of capabilities. This provides a common language to describe and compare different AGI systems, from narrow AI to systems with human-level generalized intelligence.

The paper then discusses the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that can quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models against these levels. Finally, it examines how these AGI levels interact with deployment considerations like autonomy and risk, emphasizing the importance of carefully selecting Human-AI Interaction paradigms for responsible and safe deployment of highly capable AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-reasoned and much-needed framework for describing and comparing the capabilities of AGI systems. By defining clear levels of performance and generality, it offers a common language for tracking progress and assessing risks.

However, the authors acknowledge the difficulty in creating robust benchmarks that can accurately measure the complex and multifaceted abilities of AGI. There are also questions about how to define the boundaries between levels, as AGI systems may exhibit a continuous spectrum of capabilities rather than discrete steps.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of AGI, but deployment considerations like autonomy and safety are equally crucial. More research is needed on the societal implications and governance frameworks required to ensure AGI is developed and used responsibly.

Overall, this framework is a valuable contribution to the field, but further work is needed to refine the ontology, develop suitable benchmarks, and address the broader ethical and societal challenges of transformative AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. By introducing levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, the authors provide a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.

The key contribution is a structured way to understand and track the development of increasingly capable and general AI systems. This can help guide research, inform policy, and ensure these transformative technologies are deployed safely and responsibly as they advance towards human-level abilities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

How Far Are We From AGI

How Far Are We From AGI

Tao Feng, Chuanyang Jin, Jingyu Liu, Kunlun Zhu, Haoqin Tu, Zirui Cheng, Guanyu Lin, Jiaxuan You

YC

0

Reddit

0

The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly impacted human society, driving significant advancements in multiple sectors. Yet, the escalating demands on AI have highlighted the limitations of AI's current offerings, catalyzing a movement towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). AGI, distinguished by its ability to execute diverse real-world tasks with efficiency and effectiveness comparable to human intelligence, reflects a paramount milestone in AI evolution. While existing works have summarized specific recent advancements of AI, they lack a comprehensive discussion of AGI's definitions, goals, and developmental trajectories. Different from existing survey papers, this paper delves into the pivotal questions of our proximity to AGI and the strategies necessary for its realization through extensive surveys, discussions, and original perspectives. We start by articulating the requisite capability frameworks for AGI, integrating the internal, interface, and system dimensions. As the realization of AGI requires more advanced capabilities and adherence to stringent constraints, we further discuss necessary AGI alignment technologies to harmonize these factors. Notably, we emphasize the importance of approaching AGI responsibly by first defining the key levels of AGI progression, followed by the evaluation framework that situates the status-quo, and finally giving our roadmap of how to reach the pinnacle of AGI. Moreover, to give tangible insights into the ubiquitous impact of the integration of AI, we outline existing challenges and potential pathways toward AGI in multiple domains. In sum, serving as a pioneering exploration into the current state and future trajectory of AGI, this paper aims to foster a collective comprehension and catalyze broader public discussions among researchers and practitioners on AGI.

Read more

5/17/2024

🤔

Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse

Borhane Blili-Hamelin, Leif Hancox-Li, Andrew Smart

YC

0

Reddit

0

Dreams of machines rivaling human intelligence have shaped the field of AI since its inception. Yet, the very meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. Definitions of AGI embrace a diverse range of incompatible values and assumptions. Contending with the fractured worldviews of AGI discourse is vital for critiques that pursue different values and futures. To that end, we provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We highlight instances in which these definitions frame AGI or human-level AI as a technical topic and expose the value-laden choices being implicitly made. Drawing on feminist, STS, and social science scholarship on the political and social character of intelligence in both humans and machines, we propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence. The development of future forms of AI must involve explicit attention to the values it encodes, the people it includes or excludes, and a commitment to epistemic justice.

Read more

5/16/2024

🚀

Position: Stop Making Unscientific AGI Performance Claims

Patrick Altmeyer, Andrew M. Demetriou, Antony Bartlett, Cynthia C. S. Liem

YC

0

Reddit

0

Developments in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and particularly large language models (LLMs), have created a 'perfect storm' for observing 'sparks' of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that are spurious. Like simpler models, LLMs distill meaningful representations in their latent embeddings that have been shown to correlate with external variables. Nonetheless, the correlation of such representations has often been linked to human-like intelligence in the latter but not the former. We probe models of varying complexity including random projections, matrix decompositions, deep autoencoders and transformers: all of them successfully distill information that can be used to predict latent or external variables and yet none of them have previously been linked to AGI. We argue and empirically demonstrate that the finding of meaningful patterns in latent spaces of models cannot be seen as evidence in favor of AGI. Additionally, we review literature from the social sciences that shows that humans are prone to seek such patterns and anthropomorphize. We conclude that both the methodological setup and common public image of AI are ideal for the misinterpretation that correlations between model representations and some variables of interest are 'caused' by the model's understanding of underlying 'ground truth' relationships. We, therefore, call for the academic community to exercise extra caution, and to be keenly aware of principles of academic integrity, in interpreting and communicating about AI research outcomes.

Read more

6/3/2024

📉

What is Meant by AGI? On the Definition of Artificial General Intelligence

Bowen Xu

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper aims to establish a consensus on AGI's definition. General intelligence refers to the adaptation to open environments according to certain principles using limited resources. It emphasizes that adaptation or learning is an indispensable property of intelligence, and places the controversial part within the principles of intelligence, which can be described from different perspectives.

Read more

4/17/2024