Let's Ask AI About Their Programs: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers To Program Comprehension Questions

2404.11734

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/19/2024 by Teemu Lehtinen, Charles Koutcheme, Arto Hellas
Let's Ask AI About Their Programs: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers To Program Comprehension Questions

Abstract

Recent research has explored the creation of questions from code submitted by students. These Questions about Learners' Code (QLCs) are created through program analysis, exploring execution paths, and then creating code comprehension questions from these paths and the broader code structure. Responding to the questions requires reading and tracing the code, which is known to support students' learning. At the same time, computing education researchers have witnessed the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) that have taken the community by storm. Researchers have demonstrated the applicability of these models especially in the introductory programming context, outlining their performance in solving introductory programming problems and their utility in creating new learning resources. In this work, we explore the capability of the state-of-the-art LLMs (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) in answering QLCs that are generated from code that the LLMs have created. Our results show that although the state-of-the-art LLMs can create programs and trace program execution when prompted, they easily succumb to similar errors that have previously been recorded for novice programmers. These results demonstrate the fallibility of these models and perhaps dampen the expectations fueled by the recent LLM hype. At the same time, we also highlight future research possibilities such as using LLMs to mimic students as their behavior can indeed be similar for some specific tasks.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Explores how the large language model ChatGPT performs on program comprehension tasks
  • Evaluates ChatGPT's ability to answer questions about the functionality and behavior of code snippets
  • Provides insights into the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT for introductory programming tasks

Plain English Explanation

This paper investigates how well the artificial intelligence (AI) system ChatGPT can understand and explain computer programs. ChatGPT is a large language model that is trained to generate human-like text, and the researchers were curious to see how it would perform on tasks related to programming.

The researchers presented ChatGPT with a series of questions about short code snippets, such as "What does this code do?" or "What is the output of this program?" They wanted to see if ChatGPT could accurately comprehend the purpose and behavior of the code. This is an important skill for introductory programming students to develop, as understanding how code works is a crucial part of learning to program.

By evaluating ChatGPT's responses, the researchers gained insights into the AI's strengths and weaknesses when it comes to understanding code. They found that ChatGPT was generally able to provide accurate explanations of simple programs, but struggled with more complex code. This suggests that while large language models like ChatGPT can be useful tools for generating and understanding natural language, they may have limitations when it comes to reasoning about the intricacies of computer programs.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a series of experiments to assess ChatGPT's performance on program comprehension tasks. They selected a set of code snippets representing a range of programming concepts, from simple conditional statements to more complex data structures and algorithms.

For each code snippet, the researchers asked ChatGPT questions that tested its understanding of the program's functionality, such as "What is the output of this code?" or "Describe what this code does." ChatGPT's responses were then evaluated by human raters for accuracy and completeness.

The results showed that ChatGPT was generally able to provide accurate explanations for simple programs, but struggled with more complex code. The researchers found that ChatGPT's performance was influenced by factors such as the length and complexity of the code, the programming concepts involved, and the specific wording of the questions.

The researchers also noted that ChatGPT sometimes generated plausible-sounding but incorrect responses, highlighting the need for caution when relying on large language models for tasks that require precise reasoning about code behavior. This aligns with findings from other studies that have explored the limitations of large language models in mathematical and technical domains.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study. First, the code snippets used were relatively short and focused on introductory programming concepts, so the findings may not generalize to more complex, real-world code. Additionally, the researchers only tested ChatGPT's comprehension of code, and did not evaluate its ability to generate or modify code, which are also important programming skills.

Another potential limitation is the reliance on human raters to evaluate ChatGPT's responses. While the researchers took steps to ensure consistency, there could still be some subjectivity in the assessment process. It would be interesting to see if the results hold up under more rigorous, automated evaluation methods.

Overall, the researchers provide valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of large language models like ChatGPT when it comes to program comprehension. While these models may be useful tools for certain tasks, such as generating natural language descriptions of code, the findings suggest they may not be sufficient for tasks that require deep understanding and reasoning about the intricacies of computer programs.

Conclusion

This study offers a nuanced perspective on the use of large language models like ChatGPT for programming-related tasks. While the results suggest that ChatGPT can provide accurate explanations for simple code, the model's performance degrades as the complexity of the code increases. This highlights the need for continued research and development to enhance the general capabilities of large language models in technical domains.

The findings also have implications for the potential use of large language models in educational settings, where they could be leveraged to support introductory programming instruction. However, the limitations identified in this study suggest that such models should be used with caution and as part of a broader, multifaceted approach to teaching programming concepts.

Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of large language models like ChatGPT, and underscores the importance of continued exploration and evaluation of these powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ’¬

Evaluation of the Programming Skills of Large Language Models

Luc Bryan Heitz, Joun Chamas, Christopher Scherb

YC

0

Reddit

0

The advent of Large Language Models (LLM) has revolutionized the efficiency and speed with which tasks are completed, marking a significant leap in productivity through technological innovation. As these chatbots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the challenge of assessing the quality of their outputs has become paramount. This paper critically examines the output quality of two leading LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini AI, by comparing the quality of programming code generated in both their free versions. Through the lens of a real-world example coupled with a systematic dataset, we investigate the code quality produced by these LLMs. Given their notable proficiency in code generation, this aspect of chatbot capability presents a particularly compelling area for analysis. Furthermore, the complexity of programming code often escalates to levels where its verification becomes a formidable task, underscoring the importance of our study. This research aims to shed light on the efficacy and reliability of LLMs in generating high-quality programming code, an endeavor that has significant implications for the field of software development and beyond.

Read more

5/24/2024

šŸ“Š

Analyzing Chat Protocols of Novice Programmers Solving Introductory Programming Tasks with ChatGPT

Andreas Scholl, Daniel Schiffner, Natalie Kiesler

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have taken the world by storm, and students are assumed to use related tools at a great scale. In this research paper we aim to gain an understanding of how introductory programming students chat with LLMs and related tools, e.g., ChatGPT-3.5. To address this goal, computing students at a large German university were motivated to solve programming exercises with the assistance of ChatGPT as part of their weekly introductory course exercises. Then students (n=213) submitted their chat protocols (with 2335 prompts in sum) as data basis for this analysis. The data was analyzed w.r.t. the prompts, frequencies, the chats' progress, contents, and other use pattern, which revealed a great variety of interactions, both potentially supportive and concerning. Learning about students' interactions with ChatGPT will help inform and align teaching practices and instructions for future introductory programming courses in higher education.

Read more

5/30/2024

šŸ“Š

Unmasking the giant: A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's proficiency in coding algorithms and data structures

Sayed Erfan Arefin, Tasnia Ashrafi Heya, Hasan Al-Qudah, Ynes Ineza, Abdul Serwadda

YC

0

Reddit

0

The transformative influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is profoundly reshaping the Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology domain. Notably, ChatGPT distinguishes itself within these models, demonstrating remarkable performance in multi-turn conversations and exhibiting code proficiency across an array of languages. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's coding capabilities based on what is to date the largest catalog of coding challenges. Our focus is on the python programming language and problems centered on data structures and algorithms, two topics at the very foundations of Computer Science. We evaluate ChatGPT for its ability to generate correct solutions to the problems fed to it, its code quality, and nature of run-time errors thrown by its code. Where ChatGPT code successfully executes, but fails to solve the problem at hand, we look into patterns in the test cases passed in order to gain some insights into how wrong ChatGPT code is in these kinds of situations. To infer whether ChatGPT might have directly memorized some of the data that was used to train it, we methodically design an experiment to investigate this phenomena. Making comparisons with human performance whenever feasible, we investigate all the above questions from the context of both its underlying learning models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), on a vast array sub-topics within the main topics, and on problems having varying degrees of difficulty.

Read more

5/28/2024

The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Tasks

The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Tasks

Aryan Rangapur, Aman Rangapur

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models have gained considerable interest for their impressive performance on various tasks. Within this domain, ChatGPT and GPT-4, developed by OpenAI, and the Gemini, developed by Google, have emerged as particularly popular among early adopters. Additionally, Mixtral by Mistral AI and Claude by Anthropic are newly released, further expanding the landscape of advanced language models. These models are viewed as disruptive technologies with applications spanning customer service, education, healthcare, and finance. More recently, Mistral has entered the scene, captivating users with its unique ability to generate creative content. Understanding the perspectives of these users is crucial, as they can offer valuable insights into the potential strengths, weaknesses, and overall success or failure of these technologies in various domains. This research delves into the responses generated by ChatGPT, GPT-4, Gemini, Mixtral and Claude across different Conversational QA corpora. Evaluation scores were meticulously computed and subsequently compared to ascertain the overall performance of these models. Our study pinpointed instances where these models provided inaccurate answers to questions, offering insights into potential areas where they might be susceptible to errors. In essence, this research provides a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of these state of-the-art language models, shedding light on their capabilities while also highlighting potential areas for improvement

Read more

5/29/2024