Lessons Learned: The Evolution of an Undergraduate Robotics Course in Computer Science

2404.18012

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/30/2024 by R. Pito Salas

🤯

Abstract

Seven years ago (2016), we began integrating Robotics into our Computer Science curriculum. This paper explores the mission, initial goals and objectives, specific choices we made along the way, and why and outcomes. Of course, we were not the first to do so. Our contribution in this paper is to describe a seven-year experience in the hope that others going down this road will benefit, perhaps avoiding some missteps and dead-ends. We offer our answers to many questions that anyone undertaking bootstrapping a new robotics program may have to deal with. At the end of the paper, we discuss a set of lessons learned, including striking the right balance between depth and breadth in syllabus design and material organization, the significance of utilizing physical robots and criteria for selecting a suitable robotics platform, insights into the scope and design of a robotics lab, the necessity of standardizing hardware and software configurations, along with implementation methods, and strategies for preparing students for the steep learning curve.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Seven years ago, this institution began integrating Robotics into their Computer Science curriculum.
  • The paper explores the mission, initial goals and objectives, specific choices made, and outcomes of this integration.
  • The authors aim to share their seven-year experience in the hope that others embarking on a similar journey can benefit and potentially avoid some pitfalls.
  • The paper addresses many questions that anyone starting a new robotics program may have to deal with.
  • Key topics include: [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/from-lab-to-theater-unconventional-field-robotics]syllabus design and material organization, [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/modular-resilient-scalable-system-design-approaches-lessons]selecting a suitable robotics platform, [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/framework-learning-reusing-robotic-skills]setting up a robotics lab, [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/towards-robust-soft-baby-robot-rich-interaction]standardizing hardware and software configurations, and [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-221-bugs-robot-operating-system]preparing students for the steep learning curve.

Plain English Explanation

Seven years ago, this university decided to incorporate robotics into their computer science program. The researchers wanted to share their experiences and lessons learned from this process, in the hope that it can help others who are considering a similar initiative.

The paper discusses the overall goals and objectives they had in mind when first introducing robotics, and the specific decisions they made along the way. This includes things like how they designed the curriculum to balance depth and breadth, how they chose the right robotics hardware and software platforms for their needs, and how they set up a dedicated robotics lab for students to work in.

Additionally, the researchers highlight the importance of standardizing the hardware and software configurations across the program, and strategies they used to help prepare students for the steep learning curve involved in working with robots. The paper aims to share these hard-won insights so that other institutions can benefit from their experiences, both positive and negative.

Technical Explanation

The paper describes a seven-year initiative to integrate robotics into a computer science curriculum. The researchers outline the mission, initial goals and objectives, as well as the specific choices made during the implementation process and the resulting outcomes.

The authors begin by discussing the curriculum design, including striking the right balance between depth and breadth of robotics concepts covered. They also address the significance of utilizing physical robots, and the criteria they used to select a suitable robotics platform for their needs.

In terms of the robotics lab setup, the paper explores insights into the necessary scope and design considerations. A key focus is the importance of standardizing both the hardware and software configurations across the program, along with effective implementation methods.

Finally, the researchers share strategies they employed to prepare students for the steep learning curve associated with robotics. This includes techniques to scaffold the material and provide adequate support throughout the learning process.

Throughout the paper, the authors aim to share their lessons learned in the hope that other institutions embarking on similar initiatives can benefit and potentially avoid some of the challenges they faced.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the authors' experience in integrating robotics into a computer science curriculum, which can be valuable for other institutions considering a similar path. By openly sharing the successes, challenges, and lessons learned, the researchers demonstrate a commendable commitment to supporting the broader academic community.

One potential area for further exploration could be the specific assessment methods used to evaluate the program's effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The paper alludes to positive results, but more detailed data and analysis on the impact of the robotics integration would strengthen the research.

Additionally, while the paper acknowledges that they were not the first to undertake such an initiative, it would be interesting to see how their approach compares to other published case studies in the field. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/from-lab-to-theater-unconventional-field-robotics]Exploring the unique aspects of their program and [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/modular-resilient-scalable-system-design-approaches-lessons]how it complements or differs from existing models could provide additional insights.

Overall, the paper offers a thoughtful and practical guide for educators looking to integrate robotics into their computer science curricula. The authors' transparency and willingness to share their experiences is commendable and can serve as a valuable resource for the broader academic community.

Conclusion

This paper provides a detailed account of a seven-year initiative to integrate robotics into a computer science program. By openly sharing their mission, goals, implementation choices, and outcomes, the authors aim to support other institutions embarking on similar endeavors.

The key takeaways include insights on curriculum design, robotics platform selection, lab setup, hardware and software standardization, and strategies for preparing students. These lessons learned can help educators avoid potential pitfalls and implement a more effective robotics program.

Overall, the paper demonstrates the authors' commitment to advancing robotics education and their desire to contribute to the broader academic community. Their experiences and recommendations can serve as a valuable reference for other universities looking to incorporate robotics into their computer science curricula.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Undergraduate Robotics Education with General Instructors using a Student-Centered Personalized Learning Framework

Undergraduate Robotics Education with General Instructors using a Student-Centered Personalized Learning Framework

Rui Wu, David J Feil-Seifer, Ponkoj C Shill, Hossein Jamali, Sergiu Dascalu, Fred Harris, Laura Rosof, Bryan Hutchins, Marjorie Campo Ringler, Zhen Zhu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent advancements in robotics, including applications like self-driving cars, unmanned systems, and medical robots, have had a significant impact on the job market. On one hand, big robotics companies offer training programs based on the job requirements. However, these training programs may not be as beneficial as general robotics programs offered by universities or community colleges. On the other hand, community colleges and universities face challenges with required resources, especially qualified instructors, to offer students advanced robotics education. Furthermore, the diverse backgrounds of undergraduate students present additional challenges. Some students bring extensive industry experiences, while others are newcomers to the field. To address these challenges, we propose a student-centered personalized learning framework for robotics. This framework allows a general instructor to teach undergraduate-level robotics courses by breaking down course topics into smaller components with well-defined topic dependencies, structured as a graph. This modular approach enables students to choose their learning path, catering to their unique preferences and pace. Moreover, our framework's flexibility allows for easy customization of teaching materials to meet the specific needs of host institutions. In addition to teaching materials, a frequently-asked-questions document would be prepared for a general instructor. If students' robotics questions cannot be answered by the instructor, the answers to these questions may be included in this document. For questions not covered in this document, we can gather and address them through collaboration with the robotics community and course content creators. Our user study results demonstrate the promise of this method in delivering undergraduate-level robotics education tailored to individual learning outcomes and preferences.

Read more

6/13/2024

ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Leia Stirling, Joseph Montgomery, Mark Draelos, Christoforos Mavrogiannis, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Odest Chadwicke Jenkins

YC

0

Reddit

0

The University of Michigan Robotics program focuses on the study of embodied intelligence that must sense, reason, act, and work with people to improve quality of life and productivity equitably across society. ROB 204, part of the core curriculum towards the undergraduate degree in Robotics, introduces students to topics that enable conceptually designing a robotic system to address users' needs from a sociotechnical context. Students are introduced to human-robot interaction (HRI) concepts and the process for socially-engaged design with a Learn-Reinforce-Integrate approach. In this paper, we discuss the course topics and our teaching methodology, and provide recommendations for delivering this material. Overall, students leave the course with a new understanding and appreciation for how human capabilities can inform requirements for a robotics system, how humans can interact with a robot, and how to assess the usability of robotic systems.

Read more

5/27/2024

From the Lab to the Theater: An Unconventional Field Robotics Journey

From the Lab to the Theater: An Unconventional Field Robotics Journey

Ali Imran, Vivek Shankar Varadharajan, Rafael Gomes Braga, Yann Bouteiller, Abdalwhab Bakheet Mohamed Abdalwhab, Matthis Di-Giacomo, Alexandra Mercader, Giovanni Beltrame, David St-Onge

YC

0

Reddit

0

Artistic performances involving robotic systems present unique technical challenges akin to those encountered in other field deployments. In this paper, we delve into the orchestration of robotic artistic performances, focusing on the complexities inherent in communication protocols and localization methods. Through our case studies and experimental insights, we demonstrate the breadth of technical requirements for this type of deployment, and, most importantly, the significant contributions of working closely with non-experts.

Read more

4/23/2024

WIP: A Unit Testing Framework for Self-Guided Personalized Online Robotics Learning

WIP: A Unit Testing Framework for Self-Guided Personalized Online Robotics Learning

Ponkoj Chandra Shill, David Feil-Seifer, Jiullian-Lee Vargas Ruiz, Rui Wu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Our ongoing development and deployment of an online robotics education platform highlighted a gap in providing an interactive, feedback-rich learning environment essential for mastering programming concepts in robotics, which they were not getting with the traditional code-simulate-turn in workflow. Since teaching resources are limited, students would benefit from feedback in real-time to find and fix their mistakes in the programming assignments. To address these concerns, this paper will focus on creating a system for unit testing while integrating it into the course workflow. We facilitate this real-time feedback by including unit testing in the design of programming assignments so students can understand and fix their errors on their own and without the prior help of instructors/TAs serving as a bottleneck. In line with the framework's personalized student-centered approach, this method makes it easier for students to revise, and debug their programming work, encouraging hands-on learning. The course workflow updated to include unit tests will strengthen the learning environment and make it more interactive so that students can learn how to program robots in a self-guided fashion.

Read more

5/21/2024