Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores techniques for learning diverse attacks on large language models, with the goal of enabling more robust "red-teaming" and safety tuning of these models.
- The researchers propose a novel method for generating adversarial attacks that can bypass existing defense mechanisms and expose vulnerabilities in large language models.
- The paper also introduces a game-theoretic framework for modeling the interplay between language model developers and malicious actors, providing insights into optimal defense strategies.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on finding ways to test the security and safety of large language models, like GPT-4, by trying to "hack" or exploit them in creative ways. The researchers developed a new technique that can generate a wide variety of attacks that can get around the current defenses that are used to try to make these models safer and more secure.
They also created a framework that models the "back-and-forth" between the companies developing these language models and the people trying to find ways to misuse or manipulate them. This gives insights into the best strategies for defending against these kinds of attacks.
The goal is to make these powerful language models more robust and reliable, by identifying their vulnerabilities before they can be exploited in the real world. The techniques described in this paper could help improve the safety and security of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a method for generating diverse adversarial attacks on large language models, with the aim of enabling more robust "red-teaming" and safety tuning. The researchers develop a novel attack generation framework that can bypass existing defenses and uncover vulnerabilities in models like GPT-4.
The framework uses a game-theoretic approach to model the interplay between the language model developers and malicious actors trying to exploit the models. This provides insights into optimal defense strategies, as described in the related work on red-teaming large language models.
The attack generation process involves training a separate model to craft adversarial prompts that can fool the target language model into producing undesirable outputs. This approach aims to generate a diverse set of attacks that go beyond simple prompting attacks and explore more nuanced vulnerabilities.
The paper also discusses the challenges of ensuring the safety and generalization of large language models and the potential for techniques like instruction tuning to improve their robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to identifying vulnerabilities in large language models, which is an important area of research for ensuring the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems. The game-theoretic framework provides a useful lens for understanding the dynamics between model developers and potential adversaries.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential for unintended consequences or misuse of the attack generation techniques. While the goal is to improve model safety, there is a risk that the same techniques could be used by malicious actors to actively undermine language models in the real world.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical considerations and potential societal impacts of this type of research. As language models become increasingly ubiquitous, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of techniques that can be used to exploit their vulnerabilities.
Further research is needed to ensure that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, and to develop robust safeguards and responsible use guidelines for these attack generation techniques.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to testing the security and safety of large language models, with the goal of making these powerful AI systems more robust and reliable. The researchers developed a method for generating diverse adversarial attacks that can bypass existing defenses, as well as a game-theoretic framework for modeling the interplay between model developers and potential adversaries.
While the techniques described in the paper have the potential to significantly improve the safety and security of large language models, they also raise important ethical and societal concerns that warrant further investigation. As these models become more ubiquitous, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of techniques that can be used to exploit their vulnerabilities, and to develop responsible guidelines for their use.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning
Seanie Lee, Minsu Kim, Lynn Cherif, David Dobre, Juho Lee, Sung Ju Hwang, Kenji Kawaguchi, Gauthier Gidel, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin, Moksh Jain
Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe and responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). Developing effective protection against many modes of attack prompts requires discovering diverse attacks. Automated red-teaming typically uses reinforcement learning to fine-tune an attacker language model to generate prompts that elicit undesirable responses from a target LLM, as measured, for example, by an auxiliary toxicity classifier. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. As a flexible and probabilistically principled alternative, we propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts. We find that the attacks generated by our method are effective against a wide range of target LLMs, both with and without safety tuning, and transfer well between target LLMs. Finally, we demonstrate that models safety-tuned using a dataset of red-teaming prompts generated by our method are robust to attacks from other RL-based red-teaming approaches.
Read more5/30/2024
0
ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
Simone Tedeschi, Felix Friedrich, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting, Roberto Navigli, Huu Nguyen, Bo Li
When building Large Language Models (LLMs), it is paramount to bear safety in mind and protect them with guardrails. Indeed, LLMs should never generate content promoting or normalizing harmful, illegal, or unethical behavior that may contribute to harm to individuals or society. This principle applies to both normal and adversarial use. In response, we introduce ALERT, a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It is designed to evaluate the safety of LLMs through red teaming methodologies and consists of more than 45k instructions categorized using our novel taxonomy. By subjecting LLMs to adversarial testing scenarios, ALERT aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models. Furthermore, the fine-grained taxonomy enables researchers to perform an in-depth evaluation that also helps one to assess the alignment with various policies. In our experiments, we extensively evaluate 10 popular open- and closed-source LLMs and demonstrate that many of them still struggle to attain reasonable levels of safety.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Fluent Student-Teacher Redteaming
T. Ben Thompson (Confirm Labs), Michael Sklar (Confirm Labs)
Many publicly available language models have been safety tuned to reduce the likelihood of toxic or liability-inducing text. To redteam or jailbreak these models for compliance with toxic requests, users and security analysts have developed adversarial prompting techniques. One attack method is to apply discrete optimization techniques to the prompt. However, the resulting attack strings are often gibberish text, easily filtered by defenders due to high measured perplexity, and may fail for unseen tasks and/or well-tuned models. In this work, we improve existing algorithms (primarily GCG and BEAST) to develop powerful and fluent attacks on safety-tuned models like Llama-2 and Phi-3. Our technique centers around a new distillation-based approach that encourages the victim model to emulate a toxified finetune, either in terms of output probabilities or internal activations. To encourage human-fluent attacks, we add a multi-model perplexity penalty and a repetition penalty to the objective. We also enhance optimizer strength by allowing token insertions, token swaps, and token deletions and by using longer attack sequences. The resulting process is able to reliably jailbreak the most difficult target models with prompts that appear similar to human-written prompts. On Advbench we achieve attack success rates $>93$% for Llama-2-7B, Llama-3-8B, and Vicuna-7B, while maintaining model-measured perplexity $88$% compliance on previously unseen tasks across Llama-2-7B, Phi-3-mini and Vicuna-7B and transfers to other black-box models.
Read more10/2/2024
0
ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts
Amelia F. Hardy, Houjun Liu, Bernard Lange, Mykel J. Kochenderfer
Typical schemes for automated red-teaming large language models (LLMs) focus on discovering prompts that trigger a frozen language model (the defender) to generate toxic text. This often results in the prompting model (the adversary) producing text that is unintelligible and unlikely to arise. Here, we propose a reinforcement learning formulation of the LLM red-teaming task which allows us to discover prompts that both (1) trigger toxic outputs from a frozen defender and (2) have low perplexity as scored by the defender. We argue these cases are most pertinent in a red-teaming setting because of their likelihood to arise during normal use of the defender model. We solve this formulation through a novel online and weakly supervised variant of Identity Preference Optimization (IPO) on GPT-2 and GPT-2 XL defenders. We demonstrate that our policy is capable of generating likely prompts that also trigger toxicity. Finally, we qualitatively analyze learned strategies, trade-offs of likelihood and toxicity, and discuss implications. Source code is available for this project at: https://github.com/sisl/ASTPrompter/.
Read more7/15/2024