Learn to Refuse: Making Large Language Models More Controllable and Reliable through Knowledge Scope Limitation and Refusal Mechanism

2311.01041

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/30/2024 by Lang Cao

💬

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive language understanding and generation capabilities, enabling them to answer a wide range of questions across various domains. However, these models are not flawless and often produce responses that contain errors or misinformation. These inaccuracies, commonly referred to as hallucinations, render LLMs unreliable and even unusable in many scenarios. In this paper, our focus is on mitigating the issue of hallucination in LLMs, particularly in the context of question-answering. Instead of attempting to answer all questions, we explore a refusal mechanism that instructs LLMs to refuse to answer challenging questions in order to avoid errors. We then propose a simple yet effective solution called Learn to Refuse (L2R), which incorporates the refusal mechanism to enable LLMs to recognize and refuse to answer questions that they find difficult to address. To achieve this, we utilize a structured knowledge base to represent all the LLM's understanding of the world, enabling it to provide traceable gold knowledge. This knowledge base is separate from the LLM and initially empty. It can be filled with validated knowledge and progressively expanded. When an LLM encounters questions outside its domain, the system recognizes its knowledge scope and determines whether it can answer the question independently. Additionally, we introduce a method for automatically and efficiently expanding the knowledge base of LLMs. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, we demonstrate that our approach enhances the controllability and reliability of LLMs.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) have impressive language abilities, but often produce inaccurate or unreliable responses, known as "hallucinations"
  • This paper focuses on mitigating hallucinations in LLMs, particularly in question-answering tasks
  • The proposed solution, called "Learn to Refuse" (L2R), enables LLMs to recognize and refuse to answer questions they cannot reliably address

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like language. They've shown impressive capabilities, like being able to answer a wide range of questions across different topics. However, these models are not perfect and can sometimes produce incorrect or made-up information, known as "hallucinations". These inaccuracies make LLMs unreliable and unsuitable for many real-world applications.

The research paper aims to address this issue of hallucinations in LLMs, particularly when they're used for answering questions. Instead of trying to answer every question, the researchers explore a "refusal mechanism" that instructs the LLM to refuse to answer questions it's not confident about, in order to avoid making mistakes.

The researchers propose a solution called "Learn to Refuse" (L2R), which incorporates this refusal mechanism. The key idea is to give the LLM access to a structured "knowledge base" that represents what it knows about the world. When the LLM is asked a question, it can check its knowledge base to see if it has the necessary information to answer reliably. If not, it can choose to refuse to answer rather than risk providing incorrect information.

To make this work, the researchers also introduce a method for automatically and efficiently expanding the LLM's knowledge base over time. This helps the model become more capable of answering a wider range of questions accurately.

Overall, this approach aims to enhance the controllability and reliability of LLMs by enabling them to recognize the limits of their knowledge and avoid hallucinating responses.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a solution called "Learn to Refuse" (L2R) to mitigate the issue of hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) when used for question-answering tasks.

The key elements of the L2R approach are:

  1. Refusal Mechanism: The system is trained to recognize when it lacks the necessary knowledge to answer a question reliably, and instead of attempting to guess the answer, it will refuse to respond.

  2. Structured Knowledge Base: The LLM's understanding of the world is represented in a separate, structured knowledge base. This knowledge base can be filled with validated information and expanded over time.

  3. Knowledge Scope Checking: When a question is asked, the system checks its knowledge base to determine whether it has the required information to answer the question independently. If not, it will refuse to respond.

  4. Knowledge Base Expansion: The researchers introduce a method to automatically and efficiently expand the LLM's knowledge base, allowing the system to become more capable of answering a wider range of questions accurately.

Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, the researchers demonstrate that the L2R approach enhances the controllability and reliability of LLMs, reducing the occurrence of hallucinations and improving the overall performance of the question-answering system.

Critical Analysis

The research paper presents a promising approach to addressing the issue of hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). The proposed "Learn to Refuse" (L2R) solution is a straightforward and intuitive idea - by equipping the LLM with a structured knowledge base and the ability to recognize the limits of its own knowledge, it can avoid making unreliable guesses and instead refuse to answer questions it is not confident about.

One potential limitation of the L2R approach is the reliance on a separate knowledge base, which may not always be readily available or easy to construct for every domain. The researchers mention the need for this knowledge base to be "filled with validated information," which could be a labor-intensive process. Additionally, the effectiveness of the knowledge base expansion method proposed in the paper may depend on the quality and coverage of the initial knowledge base.

Another area for further research could be exploring ways to seamlessly integrate the knowledge base with the LLM, rather than keeping it as a separate component. This could potentially lead to more efficient and effective knowledge acquisition and reasoning within the LLM itself.

Despite these potential challenges, the L2R approach represents an important step forward in enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models. By enabling LLMs to recognize and refuse to answer questions they cannot reliably address, this research contributes to the broader effort of making large language models more robust and dependable for real-world applications.

Conclusion

The research paper presents a novel solution, called "Learn to Refuse" (L2R), to mitigate the issue of hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) when used for question-answering tasks. By equipping the LLM with a structured knowledge base and the ability to recognize the limits of its own knowledge, the L2R approach enables the model to refuse to answer questions it cannot reliably address, rather than providing inaccurate or made-up responses.

The key insights from this research include the importance of incorporating external knowledge to enhance the reliability of LLMs, as well as the value of having LLMs recognize and acknowledge the boundaries of their capabilities. By addressing the issue of hallucinations, this work contributes to the ongoing efforts to make large language models more controllable, transparent, and trustworthy for real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedback

Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedback

Hongshen Xu, Zichen Zhu, Situo Zhang, Da Ma, Shuai Fan, Lu Chen, Kai Yu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate erroneous outputs, known as hallucinations, due to their limitations in discerning questions beyond their knowledge scope. While addressing hallucination has been a focal point in research, previous efforts primarily concentrate on enhancing correctness without giving due consideration to the significance of rejection mechanisms. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive examination of the role of rejection, introducing the notion of model reliability along with corresponding metrics. These metrics measure the model's ability to provide accurate responses while adeptly rejecting questions exceeding its knowledge boundaries, thereby minimizing hallucinations. To improve the inherent reliability of LLMs, we present a novel alignment framework called Reinforcement Learning from Knowledge Feedback (RLKF). RLKF leverages knowledge feedback to dynamically determine the model's knowledge boundary and trains a reliable reward model to encourage the refusal of out-of-knowledge questions. Experimental results on mathematical questions affirm the substantial efficacy of RLKF in significantly enhancing LLM reliability.

Read more

4/9/2024

🤷

LLMs can learn self-restraint through iterative self-reflection

Alexandre Pich'e, Aristides Milios, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Chris Pal

YC

0

Reddit

0

In order to be deployed safely, Large Language Models (LLMs) must be capable of dynamically adapting their behavior based on their level of knowledge and uncertainty associated with specific topics. This adaptive behavior, which we refer to as self-restraint, is non-trivial to teach since it depends on the internal knowledge of an LLM. By default, LLMs are trained to maximize the next token likelihood, which does not teach the model to modulate its answer based on its level of uncertainty. In order to learn self-restraint, we devise a utility function that can encourage the model to produce responses only when it is confident in them. This utility function can be used to score generation of different length and abstention. To optimize this function, we introduce ReSearch, a process of ``self-reflection'' consisting of iterative self-prompting and self-evaluation. We use the ReSearch algorithm to generate synthetic data on which we finetune our models. Compared to their original versions, our resulting models generate fewer emph{hallucinations} overall at no additional inference cost, for both known and unknown topics, as the model learns to selectively restrain itself. In addition, our method elegantly incorporates the ability to abstain by augmenting the samples generated by the model during the search procedure with an answer expressing abstention.

Read more

5/24/2024

💬

R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'

Hanning Zhang, Shizhe Diao, Yong Lin, Yi R. Fung, Qing Lian, Xingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Heng Ji, Tong Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized numerous domains with their impressive performance but still face their challenges. A predominant issue is the propensity for these models to generate non-existent facts, a concern termed hallucination. Our research is motivated by the observation that previous instruction tuning methods force the model to complete a sentence no matter whether the model knows the knowledge or not. When the question is out of the parametric knowledge, it will try to make up something and fail to indicate when it lacks knowledge. In this paper, we present a new approach called Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning (R-Tuning). This approach is formalized by first identifying the disparity in knowledge encompassed by pre-trained parameters compared to that of instruction tuning data. Then, we construct the refusal-aware data based on the knowledge intersection, to tune LLMs to refrain from responding to questions beyond its parametric knowledge. Experimental results demonstrate R-Tuning effectively improves a model's ability to answer known questions and refrain from answering unknown questions. Furthermore, when tested on out-of-domain datasets, the refusal ability was found to be a meta-skill that could be generalized to other tasks. Further analysis surprisingly finds that learning the uncertainty results in better calibration and an improved ability to estimate the uncertainty than uncertainty-based testing. Our code is available at https://github.com/shizhediao/R-Tuning.

Read more

6/10/2024

💬

Perception of Knowledge Boundary for Large Language Models through Semi-open-ended Question Answering

Zhihua Wen, Zhiliang Tian, Zexin Jian, Zhen Huang, Pei Ke, Yifu Gao, Minlie Huang, Dongsheng Li

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for knowledge-seeking yet suffer from hallucinations. The knowledge boundary (KB) of an LLM limits its factual understanding, beyond which it may begin to hallucinate. Investigating the perception of LLMs' KB is crucial for detecting hallucinations and LLMs' reliable generation. Current studies perceive LLMs' KB on questions with a concrete answer (close-ended questions) while paying limited attention to semi-open-ended questions (SoeQ) that correspond to many potential answers. Some researchers achieve it by judging whether the question is answerable or not. However, this paradigm is unsuitable for SoeQ, which are usually partially answerable, containing both answerable and ambiguous (unanswerable) answers. Ambiguous answers are essential for knowledge-seeking, but they may go beyond the KB of LLMs. In this paper, we perceive the LLMs' KB with SoeQ by discovering more ambiguous answers. First, we apply an LLM-based approach to construct SoeQ and obtain answers from a target LLM. Unfortunately, the output probabilities of mainstream black-box LLMs are inaccessible to sample for low-probability ambiguous answers. Therefore, we apply an open-sourced auxiliary model to explore ambiguous answers for the target LLM. We calculate the nearest semantic representation for existing answers to estimate their probabilities, with which we reduce the generation probability of high-probability answers to achieve a more effective generation. Finally, we compare the results from the RAG-based evaluation and LLM self-evaluation to categorize four types of ambiguous answers that are beyond the KB of the target LLM. Following our method, we construct a dataset to perceive the KB for GPT-4. We find that GPT-4 performs poorly on SoeQ and is often unaware of its KB. Besides, our auxiliary model, LLaMA-2-13B, is effective in discovering more ambiguous answers.

Read more

5/24/2024