0
0
Large Language Models for Relevance Judgment in Product Search
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for relevance judgment in product search.
- The researchers investigate how LLMs can be leveraged to automate the process of relevance labeling, which is crucial for training effective product search models.
- The paper presents a low-rank adaptation approach to fine-tune LLMs for relevance judgment and demonstrates its effectiveness on a real-world product search dataset.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. In the context of product search, these models can be used to assess how relevant a given product is to a user's search query. This is an important task, as it helps train the algorithms that power product search engines to deliver the most relevant results.
The researchers in this paper explore a way to use LLMs to automate the process of relevance labeling. Traditionally, this task has been done manually by human raters, which can be time-consuming and costly. By fine-tuning LLMs to perform relevance judgment, the researchers aim to make this process more efficient and scalable.
The key innovation in this paper is a "low-rank adaptation" approach, which allows the LLMs to be adapted to the specific task of relevance judgment without having to retrain the entire model from scratch. This makes the process more practical and accessible for real-world product search applications.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments using a real-world product search dataset to evaluate the performance of their low-rank adaptation approach. They fine-tuned several popular LLMs, including BERT and GPT-3, on the relevance judgment task and compared their performance to traditional machine learning models.
The results showed that the fine-tuned LLMs were able to achieve strong performance on the relevance judgment task, outperforming the traditional models. This suggests that LLMs can be effectively leveraged to automate the process of relevance labeling, which is a crucial component of building effective product search engines.
The low-rank adaptation approach proved to be particularly useful, as it allowed the researchers to quickly and efficiently adapt the LLMs to the specific task at hand without having to retrain the entire model from scratch. This makes it easier to deploy these models in real-world product search applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how LLMs can be used to automate the relevance judgment process in product search. However, the researchers acknowledge that their approach has some limitations. For example, the performance of the fine-tuned LLMs may be sensitive to the specific dataset used for training, and further research may be needed to understand how well the models generalize to different product domains.
Additionally, while the low-rank adaptation approach is efficient, it may not capture all the nuances of the relevance judgment task. There may be room for further refinement and optimization of the fine-tuning process to improve the overall performance of the models.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the application of LLMs to product search and e-commerce. The researchers have demonstrated the potential of these powerful AI models to streamline and automate key tasks, such as relevance judgment, which are essential for building effective and user-friendly product search experiences.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to leveraging large language models (LLMs) for relevance judgment in product search. The researchers show that by fine-tuning LLMs using a low-rank adaptation technique, they can achieve strong performance on the relevance judgment task, outperforming traditional machine learning models.
The ability to automate the relevance labeling process has significant implications for the development of more effective and scalable product search engines. By reducing the reliance on manual labeling, the researchers have opened the door for faster and more efficient training of product search models, ultimately leading to better user experiences.
While the paper highlights the promise of this approach, it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the application of large language models to real-world e-commerce challenges, and it will likely inspire further innovation in this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
0
Related Papers
0
Towards More Relevant Product Search Ranking Via Large Language Models: An Empirical Study
Qi Liu, Atul Singh, Jingbo Liu, Cun Mu, Zheng Yan
Training Learning-to-Rank models for e-commerce product search ranking can be challenging due to the lack of a gold standard of ranking relevance. In this paper, we decompose ranking relevance into content-based and engagement-based aspects, and we propose to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) for both label and feature generation in model training, primarily aiming to improve the model's predictive capability for content-based relevance. Additionally, we introduce different sigmoid transformations on the LLM outputs to polarize relevance scores in labeling, enhancing the model's ability to balance content-based and engagement-based relevances and thus prioritize highly relevant items overall. Comprehensive online tests and offline evaluations are also conducted for the proposed design. Our work sheds light on advanced strategies for integrating LLMs into e-commerce product search ranking model training, offering a pathway to more effective and balanced models with improved ranking relevance.
Read more9/27/2024
💬
0
Exploring Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Tetun
Gabriel de Jesus, S'ergio Nunes
The Cranfield paradigm has served as a foundational approach for developing test collections, with relevance judgments typically conducted by human assessors. However, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has introduced new possibilities for automating these tasks. This paper explores the feasibility of using LLMs to automate relevance assessments, particularly within the context of low-resource languages. In our study, LLMs are employed to automate relevance judgment tasks, by providing a series of query-document pairs in Tetun as the input text. The models are tasked with assigning relevance scores to each pair, where these scores are then compared to those from human annotators to evaluate the inter-annotator agreement levels. Our investigation reveals results that align closely with those reported in studies of high-resource languages.
Read more6/12/2024
0
A Large-Scale Study of Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models: An Initial Look
Shivani Upadhyay, Ronak Pradeep, Nandan Thakur, Daniel Campos, Nick Craswell, Ian Soboroff, Hoa Trang Dang, Jimmy Lin
The application of large language models to provide relevance assessments presents exciting opportunities to advance information retrieval, natural language processing, and beyond, but to date many unknowns remain. This paper reports on the results of a large-scale evaluation (the TREC 2024 RAG Track) where four different relevance assessment approaches were deployed in situ: the standard fully manual process that NIST has implemented for decades and three different alternatives that take advantage of LLMs to different extents using the open-source UMBRELA tool. This setup allows us to correlate system rankings induced by the different approaches to characterize tradeoffs between cost and quality. We find that in terms of nDCG@20, nDCG@100, and Recall@100, system rankings induced by automatically generated relevance assessments from UMBRELA correlate highly with those induced by fully manual assessments across a diverse set of 77 runs from 19 teams. Our results suggest that automatically generated UMBRELA judgments can replace fully manual judgments to accurately capture run-level effectiveness. Surprisingly, we find that LLM assistance does not appear to increase correlation with fully manual assessments, suggesting that costs associated with human-in-the-loop processes do not bring obvious tangible benefits. Overall, human assessors appear to be stricter than UMBRELA in applying relevance criteria. Our work validates the use of LLMs in academic TREC-style evaluations and provides the foundation for future studies.
Read more11/14/2024
0
Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval
Shengjie Ma, Chong Chen, Qi Chu, Jiaxin Mao
Collecting relevant judgments for legal case retrieval is a challenging and time-consuming task. Accurately judging the relevance between two legal cases requires a considerable effort to read the lengthy text and a high level of domain expertise to extract Legal Facts and make juridical judgments. With the advent of advanced large language models, some recent studies have suggested that it is promising to use LLMs for relevance judgment. Nonetheless, the method of employing a general large language model for reliable relevance judgments in legal case retrieval is yet to be thoroughly explored. To fill this research gap, we devise a novel few-shot workflow tailored to the relevant judgment of legal cases. The proposed workflow breaks down the annotation process into a series of stages, imitating the process employed by human annotators and enabling a flexible integration of expert reasoning to enhance the accuracy of relevance judgments. By comparing the relevance judgments of LLMs and human experts, we empirically show that we can obtain reliable relevance judgments with the proposed workflow. Furthermore, we demonstrate the capacity to augment existing legal case retrieval models through the synthesis of data generated by the large language model.
Read more7/16/2024