Language Models Still Struggle to Zero-shot Reason about Time Series

2404.11757

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/19/2024 by Mike A. Merrill, Mingtian Tan, Vinayak Gupta, Tom Hartvigsen, Tim Althoff
Language Models Still Struggle to Zero-shot Reason about Time Series

Abstract

Time series are critical for decision-making in fields like finance and healthcare. Their importance has driven a recent influx of works passing time series into language models, leading to non-trivial forecasting on some datasets. But it remains unknown whether non-trivial forecasting implies that language models can reason about time series. To address this gap, we generate a first-of-its-kind evaluation framework for time series reasoning, including formal tasks and a corresponding dataset of multi-scale time series paired with text captions across ten domains. Using these data, we probe whether language models achieve three forms of reasoning: (1) Etiological Reasoning - given an input time series, can the language model identify the scenario that most likely created it? (2) Question Answering - can a language model answer factual questions about time series? (3) Context-Aided Forecasting - does highly relevant textual context improve a language model's time series forecasts? We find that otherwise highly-capable language models demonstrate surprisingly limited time series reasoning: they score marginally above random on etiological and question answering tasks (up to 30 percentage points worse than humans) and show modest success in using context to improve forecasting. These weakness showcase that time series reasoning is an impactful, yet deeply underdeveloped direction for language model research. We also make our datasets and code public at to support further research in this direction at https://github.com/behavioral-data/TSandLanguage

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the limitations of language models in zero-shot reasoning about time series data.
  • The researchers developed a dataset to assess different forms of time series reasoning and evaluated the performance of large language models on this task.
  • The results suggest that current language models still struggle to effectively reason about time series data, highlighting the need for further research and development in this area.

Plain English Explanation

Language models, the advanced artificial intelligence systems that can process and generate human-like text, have made impressive advances in recent years. However, this paper reveals that these models still have significant limitations when it comes to reasoning about time series data.

Time series data refers to a sequence of measurements or observations taken over time, such as stock prices, weather patterns, or sales figures. Reasoning about this type of data often requires understanding concepts like trends, cycles, and seasonality, as well as making predictions and drawing insights from the data.

The researchers behind this paper developed a specialized dataset to test different forms of time series reasoning, such as identifying patterns, making forecasts, and answering questions about the data. They then evaluated the performance of several large language models on this dataset, and the results were not very encouraging.

The language models struggled to accurately reason about the time series data, often making mistakes or providing responses that did not demonstrate a true understanding of the underlying concepts. This suggests that current language models, while powerful in many areas, still have significant room for improvement when it comes to working with time-dependent data.

The implications of this research are important for anyone working with time series data, from financial analysts to meteorologists. It highlights the need for further advancements in language model architecture, training, and evaluation to better equip these systems for the unique challenges of time series reasoning.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper developed a dataset called the Time Series Reasoning (TSR) dataset to assess the ability of language models to reason about time series data in a zero-shot setting. The dataset covers a variety of time series reasoning tasks, including pattern identification, forecasting, and answering questions about the data.

To evaluate the performance of language models on the TSR dataset, the researchers tested several large, pre-trained models, including GPT-3, PALM, and BERT. The models were asked to perform the various time series reasoning tasks without any fine-tuning or additional training on the dataset.

The results showed that the language models struggled to effectively reason about the time series data, often making mistakes or providing responses that did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the underlying concepts. This was true across the different types of reasoning tasks, suggesting that current language models still have significant limitations when it comes to working with time-dependent data.

The researchers attribute this poor performance to the inherent challenges of time series reasoning, which requires a deep understanding of concepts like trends, cycles, and seasonality. They argue that existing language models, which are primarily trained on static, textual data, may not be well-equipped to handle the unique characteristics of time series data.

The paper also discusses potential avenues for future research, such as incorporating specialized time series modeling techniques into language model architectures or developing novel evaluation frameworks that better capture the nuances of time series reasoning.

Critical Analysis

The findings of this paper are significant and raise important questions about the limitations of current language models. While these models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in many domains, the struggle to reason about time series data highlights a crucial gap in their abilities.

One potential limitation of the research is the use of a relatively small dataset for the time series reasoning tasks. While the TSR dataset covers a range of relevant scenarios, a larger and more diverse dataset could provide a more comprehensive assessment of language model performance.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential impact of fine-tuning or further training the language models on time series data. It's possible that with specialized training, the models could improve their time series reasoning abilities, though this would require additional research.

Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the specific reasons why language models struggle with time series data. A deeper analysis of the underlying challenges, such as the models' difficulty in capturing temporal dependencies or understanding the unique characteristics of time-dependent data, could provide valuable insights for future research.

Despite these potential limitations, the paper's findings are an important contribution to the field of natural language processing. The researchers have identified a significant weakness in current language models and have laid the groundwork for further exploration and development in this area.

Conclusion

This paper highlights a critical limitation of current language models: their struggle to effectively reason about time series data. The researchers developed a specialized dataset to assess different forms of time series reasoning and found that large language models, despite their impressive capabilities in many domains, still struggle to perform these tasks.

The implications of this research are far-reaching, as time series data is ubiquitous across various industries and applications, from finance and economics to meteorology and supply chain management. The inability of language models to reason about this type of data poses a significant obstacle to their broader adoption and integration in real-world scenarios.

The findings of this paper underscore the need for further research and development in language model architecture, training, and evaluation to better equip these systems for the unique challenges of time series reasoning. By addressing this limitation, researchers and practitioners can unlock the full potential of language models and enable more robust and accurate decision-making across a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

A Survey of Time Series Foundation Models: Generalizing Time Series Representation with Large Language Mode

A Survey of Time Series Foundation Models: Generalizing Time Series Representation with Large Language Mode

Jiexia Ye, Weiqi Zhang, Ke Yi, Yongzi Yu, Ziyue Li, Jia Li, Fugee Tsung

YC

0

Reddit

0

Time series data are ubiquitous across various domains, making time series analysis critically important. Traditional time series models are task-specific, featuring singular functionality and limited generalization capacity. Recently, large language foundation models have unveiled their remarkable capabilities for cross-task transferability, zero-shot/few-shot learning, and decision-making explainability. This success has sparked interest in the exploration of foundation models to solve multiple time series challenges simultaneously. There are two main research lines, namely pre-training foundation models from scratch for time series and adapting large language foundation models for time series. They both contribute to the development of a unified model that is highly generalizable, versatile, and comprehensible for time series analysis. This survey offers a 3E analytical framework for comprehensive examination of related research. Specifically, we examine existing works from three dimensions, namely Effectiveness, Efficiency and Explainability. In each dimension, we focus on discussing how related works devise tailored solution by considering unique challenges in the realm of time series. Furthermore, we provide a domain taxonomy to help followers keep up with the domain-specific advancements. In addition, we introduce extensive resources to facilitate the field's development, including datasets, open-source, time series libraries. A GitHub repository is also maintained for resource updates (https://github.com/start2020/Awesome-TimeSeries-LLM-FM).

Read more

5/8/2024

Timo: Towards Better Temporal Reasoning for Language Models

New!Timo: Towards Better Temporal Reasoning for Language Models

Zhaochen Su, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Juntao Li, Min Zhang, Yu Cheng

YC

0

Reddit

0

Reasoning about time is essential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to understand the world. Previous works focus on solving specific tasks, primarily on time-sensitive question answering. While these methods have proven effective, they cannot generalize to a wider spectrum of temporal reasoning tasks. Therefore, we propose a crucial question: Can we build a universal framework to handle a variety of temporal reasoning tasks? To that end, we systematically study 38 temporal reasoning tasks. Based on the observation that 19 tasks are directly related to mathematics, we first leverage the available mathematical dataset to set a solid foundation for temporal reasoning. However, the in-depth study indicates that focusing solely on mathematical enhancement falls short of addressing pure temporal reasoning tasks. To mitigate this limitation, we propose a simple but effective self-critic temporal optimization method to enhance the model's temporal reasoning capabilities without sacrificing general task abilities. Finally, we develop Timo, a model designed to excel in temporal reasoning at the 7B and 13B scales. Notably, Timo outperforms the counterpart LLMs by 10.0 and 7.6 in average accuracy scores and achieves the new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance of comparable size. Extensive experiments further validate our framework's effectiveness and its generalization across diverse temporal tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/zhaochen0110/Timo.

Read more

6/21/2024

Position: What Can Large Language Models Tell Us about Time Series Analysis

Position: What Can Large Language Models Tell Us about Time Series Analysis

Ming Jin, Yifan Zhang, Wei Chen, Kexin Zhang, Yuxuan Liang, Bin Yang, Jindong Wang, Shirui Pan, Qingsong Wen

YC

0

Reddit

0

Time series analysis is essential for comprehending the complexities inherent in various realworld systems and applications. Although large language models (LLMs) have recently made significant strides, the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) equipped with time series analysis capabilities remains in its nascent phase. Most existing time series models heavily rely on domain knowledge and extensive model tuning, predominantly focusing on prediction tasks. In this paper, we argue that current LLMs have the potential to revolutionize time series analysis, thereby promoting efficient decision-making and advancing towards a more universal form of time series analytical intelligence. Such advancement could unlock a wide range of possibilities, including time series modality switching and question answering. We encourage researchers and practitioners to recognize the potential of LLMs in advancing time series analysis and emphasize the need for trust in these related efforts. Furthermore, we detail the seamless integration of time series analysis with existing LLM technologies and outline promising avenues for future research.

Read more

6/4/2024

Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning

Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning

Siheng Xiong, Ali Payani, Ramana Kompella, Faramarz Fekri

YC

0

Reddit

0

While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, they are not without their flaws and inaccuracies. Recent studies have introduced various methods to mitigate these limitations. Temporal reasoning (TR), in particular, presents a significant challenge for LLMs due to its reliance on diverse temporal concepts and intricate temporal logic. In this paper, we propose TG-LLM, a novel framework towards language-based TR. Instead of reasoning over the original context, we adopt a latent representation, temporal graph (TG) that enhances the learning of TR. A synthetic dataset (TGQA), which is fully controllable and requires minimal supervision, is constructed for fine-tuning LLMs on this text-to-TG translation task. We confirmed in experiments that the capability of TG translation learned on our dataset can be transferred to other TR tasks and benchmarks. On top of that, we teach LLM to perform deliberate reasoning over the TGs via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) bootstrapping and graph data augmentation. We observed that those strategies, which maintain a balance between usefulness and diversity, bring more reliable CoTs and final results than the vanilla CoT distillation.

Read more

6/12/2024