Iteration of Thought: Leveraging Inner Dialogue for Autonomous Large Language Model Reasoning

    Read original: arXiv:2409.12618 - Published 10/2/2024 by Santosh Kumar Radha, Yasamin Nouri Jelyani, Ara Ghukasyan, Oktay Goktas
    Total Score

    0

    💬

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • Iterative human engagement is an effective way to leverage the advanced language processing capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
    • The Iteration of Thought (IoT) framework is proposed to enhance LLM responses by dynamically generating thought-provoking prompts based on the input query and the current LLM response.
    • Unlike static or semi-static approaches, IoT adapts its reasoning path dynamically without discarding alternate exploratory thoughts.
    • The three components of IoT are an Inner Dialogue Agent (IDA), an LLM Agent (LLMA), and an iterative prompting loop.
    • Two variants of IoT are introduced: Autonomous Iteration of Thought (AIoT) and Guided Iteration of Thought (GIoT).

    Plain English Explanation

    Iterative human engagement involves a back-and-forth conversation where the human user provides prompts and the language model refines its responses. This can be an effective way to leverage the advanced natural language processing capabilities of large language models (LLMs).

    The Iteration of Thought (IoT) framework is designed to enhance the responses of LLMs by dynamically generating thought-provoking prompts. It does this based on the original input query and the current response from the LLM. This allows the LLM to refine its reasoning and produce more thoughtful and accurate responses.

    Unlike static or semi-static approaches, IoT adapts its reasoning path dynamically, without discarding alternate exploratory thoughts. This makes the process more adaptive and efficient, requiring less human intervention.

    The IoT framework has three key components:

    1. An Inner Dialogue Agent (IDA) that generates the instructive, context-specific prompts.
    2. An LLM Agent (LLMA) that processes these prompts to refine its responses.
    3. An iterative prompting loop that facilitates the conversation between the IDA and LLMA.

    Two variants of the IoT framework are introduced:

    • Autonomous Iteration of Thought (AIoT), where the LLM decides when to stop iterating.
    • Guided Iteration of Thought (GIoT), which always forces a fixed number of iterations.

    Technical Explanation

    The Iteration of Thought (IoT) framework is proposed as a means of enhancing the responses of large language models (LLMs) through iterative human engagement.

    Unlike static or semi-static approaches like Chain of Thought (CoT) or Tree of Thoughts (ToT), IoT dynamically adapts its reasoning path based on the evolving context, without discarding alternate exploratory thoughts.

    The framework consists of three key components:

    1. Inner Dialogue Agent (IDA): Responsible for generating instructive, context-specific prompts to refine the LLM's responses.
    2. LLM Agent (LLMA): Processes the prompts generated by the IDA to iteratively refine its responses.
    3. Iterative Prompting Loop: Facilitates the conversation between the IDA and LLMA.

    Two variants of the IoT framework are introduced:

    1. Autonomous Iteration of Thought (AIoT): The LLM decides when to stop iterating.
    2. Guided Iteration of Thought (GIoT): A fixed number of iterations is always performed.

    The authors evaluate the performance of IoT across various datasets, including complex reasoning tasks from the GPQA dataset, explorative problem-solving in Game of 24, puzzle solving in Mini Crosswords, and multi-hop question answering from the HotpotQA dataset.

    The results show that IoT represents a viable paradigm for autonomous response refinement in LLMs, showcasing significant improvements over CoT and enabling more adaptive and efficient reasoning systems that minimize human intervention.

    Critical Analysis

    The IoT framework presented in the paper is a promising approach for enhancing the responses of large language models through iterative human engagement. By dynamically generating thought-provoking prompts, the framework allows LLMs to refine their reasoning and produce more accurate and thoughtful responses.

    One potential limitation of the IoT framework is the complexity involved in designing the Inner Dialogue Agent (IDA) to generate effective prompts. The success of the framework relies heavily on the IDA's ability to provide instructive and context-specific prompts that truly challenge the LLM and guide it toward more insightful responses.

    Additionally, the authors' evaluation of IoT across various datasets, while comprehensive, does not provide insights into the framework's performance on real-world, open-ended tasks that may require more nuanced and flexible reasoning. Further research could explore the application of IoT in more diverse and complex domains.

    It would also be valuable to investigate the scalability of the IoT framework, particularly as the size and complexity of LLMs continue to grow. Ensuring that the iterative process remains efficient and does not become computationally prohibitive will be crucial for the widespread adoption of this approach.

    Conclusion

    The Iteration of Thought (IoT) framework proposed in this paper represents a viable paradigm for enhancing the responses of large language models through iterative human engagement. By dynamically generating thought-provoking prompts, the framework allows LLMs to refine their reasoning and produce more accurate and insightful responses.

    The introduction of two variants, Autonomous Iteration of Thought (AIoT) and Guided Iteration of Thought (GIoT), demonstrates the flexibility of the IoT approach and its potential to adapt to different use cases and user preferences.

    While the framework shows promising results across various datasets, further research is needed to explore its scalability, the design of effective Inner Dialogue Agents, and its performance on real-world, open-ended tasks. Nonetheless, the IoT framework represents an important step forward in the development of more adaptive and efficient reasoning systems that can leverage the power of large language models while minimizing the need for human intervention.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    Iteration of Thought: Leveraging Inner Dialogue for Autonomous Large Language Model Reasoning

    Santosh Kumar Radha, Yasamin Nouri Jelyani, Ara Ghukasyan, Oktay Goktas

    Iterative human engagement is a common and effective means of leveraging the advanced language processing power of large language models (LLMs). Using well-structured prompts in a conversational manner, human users can effectively influence an LLM to develop more thoughtful and accurate responses. Motivated by this insight, we propose the Iteration of Thought (IoT) framework for enhancing LLM responses by generating thought-provoking prompts vis a vis an input query and the current iteration of an LLM's response. Unlike static or semi-static approaches, e.g. Chain of Thought (CoT) or Tree of Thoughts (ToT), IoT adapts its reasoning path dynamically, based on evolving context, and without generating alternate explorative thoughts which are ultimately discarded. The three components of the IoT framework are (1) an Inner Dialogue Agent (IDA) responsible for generating instructive, context-specific prompts; (2) an LLM Agent (LLMA) that processes these prompts to refine its responses; and (3) an iterative prompting loop that implements a conversation between the former two components. We introduce two variants of our framework: Autonomous Iteration of Thought (AIoT), where an LLM decides when to stop iterating, and Guided Iteration of Thought (GIoT), which always forces a fixed number iterations. We investigate the performance of IoT across various datasets, spanning complex reasoning tasks from the GPQA dataset, explorative problem-solving in Game of 24, puzzle solving in Mini Crosswords, and multi-hop question answering from the HotpotQA dataset. Our results show that IoT represents a viable paradigm for autonomous response refinement in LLMs, showcasing significant improvements over CoT and thereby enabling more adaptive and efficient reasoning systems that minimize human intervention.

    Read more

    10/2/2024

    💬

    Total Score

    0

    Image-of-Thought Prompting for Visual Reasoning Refinement in Multimodal Large Language Models

    Qiji Zhou, Ruochen Zhou, Zike Hu, Panzhong Lu, Siyang Gao, Yue Zhang

    Recent advancements in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and related rationale-based works have significantly improved the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex reasoning tasks. With the evolution of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), enhancing their capability to tackle complex multimodal reasoning problems is a crucial frontier. However, incorporating multimodal rationales in CoT has yet to be thoroughly investigated. We propose the Image-of-Thought (IoT) prompting method, which helps MLLMs to extract visual rationales step-by-step. Specifically, IoT prompting can automatically design critical visual information extraction operations based on the input images and questions. Each step of visual information refinement identifies specific visual rationales that support answers to complex visual reasoning questions. Beyond the textual CoT, IoT simultaneously utilizes visual and textual rationales to help MLLMs understand complex multimodal information. IoT prompting has improved zero-shot visual reasoning performance across various visual understanding tasks in different MLLMs. Moreover, the step-by-step visual feature explanations generated by IoT prompting elucidate the visual reasoning process, aiding in analyzing the cognitive processes of large multimodal models

    Read more

    5/30/2024

    Auto-Evolve: Enhancing Large Language Model's Performance via Self-Reasoning Framework
    Total Score

    0

    New!Auto-Evolve: Enhancing Large Language Model's Performance via Self-Reasoning Framework

    Krishna Aswani, Huilin Lu, Pranav Patankar, Priya Dhalwani, Iris Tan, Jayant Ganeshmohan, Simon Lacasse

    Recent advancements in prompt engineering strategies, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Self-Discover, have demonstrated significant potential in improving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, these state-of-the-art (SOTA) prompting strategies rely on single or fixed set of static seed reasoning modules like emph{think step by step} or emph{break down this problem} intended to simulate human approach to problem-solving. This constraint limits the flexibility of models in tackling diverse problems effectively. In this paper, we introduce Auto-Evolve, a novel framework that enables LLMs to self-create dynamic reasoning modules and downstream action plan, resulting in significant improvements over current SOTA methods. We evaluate Auto-Evolve on the challenging BigBench-Hard (BBH) dataset with Claude 2.0, Claude 3 Sonnet, Mistral Large, and GPT 4, where it consistently outperforms the SOTA prompt strategies. Auto-Evolve outperforms CoT by up to 10.4% and on an average by 7% across these four models. Our framework introduces two innovations: a) Auto-Evolve dynamically generates reasoning modules for each task while aligning with human reasoning paradigm, thus eliminating the need for predefined templates. b) We introduce an iterative refinement component, that incrementally refines instruction guidance for LLMs and helps boost performance by average 2.8% compared to doing it in a single step.

    Read more

    10/10/2024

    Thought-Like-Pro: Enhancing Reasoning of Large Language Models through Self-Driven Prolog-based Chain-of-Though
    Total Score

    0

    Thought-Like-Pro: Enhancing Reasoning of Large Language Models through Self-Driven Prolog-based Chain-of-Though

    Xiaoyu Tan (INF Technology), Yongxin Deng (Shanghai University of Engineering Science), Xihe Qiu (Shanghai University of Engineering Science), Weidi Xu (INF Technology), Chao Qu (INF Technology), Wei Chu (INF Technology), Yinghui Xu (Fudan University), Yuan Qi (Fudan University)

    Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional performance as general-purpose assistants, excelling across a variety of reasoning tasks. This achievement represents a significant step toward achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). Despite these advancements, the effectiveness of LLMs often hinges on the specific prompting strategies employed, and there remains a lack of a robust framework to facilitate learning and generalization across diverse reasoning tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel learning framework, THOUGHT-LIKE-PRO In this framework, we utilize imitation learning to imitate the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process which is verified and translated from reasoning trajectories generated by a symbolic Prolog logic engine. This framework proceeds in a self-driven manner, that enables LLMs to formulate rules and statements from given instructions and leverage the symbolic Prolog engine to derive results. Subsequently, LLMs convert Prolog-derived successive reasoning trajectories into natural language CoT for imitation learning. Our empirical findings indicate that our proposed approach substantially enhances the reasoning abilities of LLMs and demonstrates robust generalization across out-of-distribution reasoning tasks.

    Read more

    8/13/2024