The Impact of Depth on Compositional Generalization in Transformer Language Models

2310.19956

YC

0

Reddit

7

Published 4/12/2024 by Jackson Petty, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Ishita Dasgupta, Fei Sha, Dan Garrette, Tal Linzen

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Abstract

To process novel sentences, language models (LMs) must generalize compositionally -- combine familiar elements in new ways. What aspects of a model's structure promote compositional generalization? Focusing on transformers, we test the hypothesis, motivated by theoretical and empirical work, that deeper transformers generalize more compositionally. Simply adding layers increases the total number of parameters; to address this confound between depth and size, we construct three classes of models which trade off depth for width such that the total number of parameters is kept constant (41M, 134M and 374M parameters). We pretrain all models as LMs and fine-tune them on tasks that test for compositional generalization. We report three main conclusions: (1) after fine-tuning, deeper models generalize more compositionally than shallower models do, but the benefit of additional layers diminishes rapidly; (2) within each family, deeper models show better language modeling performance, but returns are similarly diminishing; (3) the benefits of depth for compositional generalization cannot be attributed solely to better performance on language modeling. Because model latency is approximately linear in the number of layers, these results lead us to the recommendation that, with a given total parameter budget, transformers can be made shallower than is typical without sacrificing performance.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Language models (LMs) must be able to generalize compositionally - combine familiar elements in new ways - to process novel sentences.
  • This paper investigates how the depth of transformer models affects their ability to generalize compositionally.
  • The researchers built three sets of transformer models with varying depths but constant total parameters, then tested their compositional generalization on various tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you're trying to teach a language model how to understand new sentences. It's not enough for the model to simply memorize a bunch of words and sentences - it needs to be able to take those familiar elements and put them together in novel ways. This is called "compositional generalization," and it's a crucial capability for language models.

The researchers in this paper wanted to explore what aspects of a transformer model's structure might promote this kind of compositional generalization. Transformers are a popular type of language model, and the researchers focused on how the depth (number of layers) of a transformer model might affect its ability to generalize compositionally.

To test this, the researchers built three different sets of transformer models. Each set had a different number of layers, but the total number of parameters (the model's "size") was kept constant across the sets. This allowed the researchers to isolate the effect of depth, rather than just larger model size.

After training the models as language models, the researchers tested them on tasks designed to measure compositional generalization. The key findings were:

These results suggest that, with a given parameter budget, transformer models can be made shallower than is typical without sacrificing performance, since the benefits of additional layers diminish. This could lead to more efficient and practical language models.

Technical Explanation

The researchers hypothesized that deeper transformer models would exhibit greater compositional generalization, based on theoretical and empirical work. To test this, they constructed three sets of transformer models with varying depths but constant total parameters (41M, 134M, and 374M).

All models were pretrained as language models, then fine-tuned on tasks designed to measure compositional generalization. These tasks involved combining familiar linguistic elements in novel ways, such as generating novel sentences by combining phrases or solving arithmetic problems expressed in natural language.

The key findings were:

  1. After fine-tuning, the deeper models within each parameter set exhibited better compositional generalization than the shallower models. However, the benefit of additional layers diminished rapidly.
  2. Within each parameter set, the deeper models showed better language modeling performance, but the returns similarly diminished with additional layers.
  3. The benefits of depth for compositional generalization could not be fully explained by the models' language modeling performance.

These results suggest that, for a given parameter budget, transformer models can be made shallower than is typical without sacrificing performance, since the gains from additional layers diminish. This could lead to more efficient and practical language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and systematic investigation into how the depth of transformer models affects their ability to generalize compositionally. The researchers' use of constant parameter budgets across model sets is a robust experimental design that helps isolate the impact of depth.

One potential limitation is the specific tasks used to assess compositional generalization. While the researchers selected tasks based on prior work, it's possible that other types of compositional tasks could yield different results. Additionally, the paper does not explore potential interactions between model depth and other architectural choices, such as the use of residual connections or attention mechanisms.

The researchers acknowledge that the underlying reasons for the diminishing returns of depth are not fully clear and warrant further investigation. It would be valuable to see additional research delving into the theoretical and cognitive mechanisms that could explain these findings.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to our understanding of how transformer model depth affects compositional generalization. The insights provided could help guide the design of more efficient and effective language models going forward.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that deeper transformer models exhibit greater compositional generalization abilities than shallower models, but the benefits of additional layers diminish rapidly. The researchers also found that deeper models show better language modeling performance, but the returns similarly diminish.

These findings suggest that, for a given parameter budget, transformer models can be made shallower than is typical without sacrificing performance. This could lead to the development of more efficient and practical language models that maintain strong compositional generalization capabilities.

The paper provides valuable empirical evidence on the role of model depth in promoting compositional generalization, an important capability for language models. The insights generated by this research can help guide future work on designing transformer architectures that are both powerful and computationally efficient.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Limits of Transformer Language Models on Learning to Compose Algorithms

Jonathan Thomm, Aleksandar Terzic, Giacomo Camposampiero, Michael Hersche, Bernhard Scholkopf, Abbas Rahimi

YC

0

Reddit

0

We analyze the capabilities of Transformer language models in learning compositional discrete tasks. To this end, we evaluate training LLaMA models and prompting GPT-4 and Gemini on four tasks demanding to learn a composition of several discrete sub-tasks. On both training LLaMA models from scratch and prompting on GPT-4 and Gemini, we measure how well these models can reuse primitives observable in the sub-tasks to learn the composition task. Our results indicate that compositional learning in state-of-the-art Transformer language models is highly sample inefficient: LLaMA requires more data samples than relearning all sub-tasks from scratch to learn the compositional task; in-context prompting with few samples is unreliable and fails at executing the sub-tasks or correcting the errors in multi-round code generation. Further, by leveraging complexity theory, we support these findings with a theoretical analysis focused on the sample inefficiency of gradient descent in memorizing feedforward models.

Read more

5/28/2024

๐Ÿงช

On Provable Length and Compositional Generalization

Kartik Ahuja, Amin Mansouri

YC

0

Reddit

0

Out-of-distribution generalization capabilities of sequence-to-sequence models can be studied from the lens of two crucial forms of generalization: length generalization -- the ability to generalize to longer sequences than ones seen during training, and compositional generalization: the ability to generalize to token combinations not seen during training. In this work, we provide first provable guarantees on length and compositional generalization for common sequence-to-sequence models -- deep sets, transformers, state space models, and recurrent neural nets -- trained to minimize the prediction error. Taking a first principles perspective, we study the realizable case, i.e., the labeling function is realizable on the architecture. We show that limited capacity versions of these different architectures achieve both length and compositional generalization. Across different architectures, we also find that a linear relationship between the learned representation and the representation in the labeling function is necessary for length and compositional generalization.

Read more

6/11/2024

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Compositional Generalization with Grounded Language Models

Sondre Wold, 'Etienne Simon, Lucas Georges Gabriel Charpentier, Egor V. Kostylev, Erik Velldal, Lilja {O}vrelid

YC

0

Reddit

0

Grounded language models use external sources of information, such as knowledge graphs, to meet some of the general challenges associated with pre-training. By extending previous work on compositional generalization in semantic parsing, we allow for a controlled evaluation of the degree to which these models learn and generalize from patterns in knowledge graphs. We develop a procedure for generating natural language questions paired with knowledge graphs that targets different aspects of compositionality and further avoids grounding the language models in information already encoded implicitly in their weights. We evaluate existing methods for combining language models with knowledge graphs and find them to struggle with generalization to sequences of unseen lengths and to novel combinations of seen base components. While our experimental results provide some insight into the expressive power of these models, we hope our work and released datasets motivate future research on how to better combine language models with structured knowledge representations.

Read more

6/10/2024

๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Attention as a Hypernetwork

Simon Schug, Seijin Kobayashi, Yassir Akram, Jo~ao Sacramento, Razvan Pascanu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Transformers can under some circumstances generalize to novel problem instances whose constituent parts might have been encountered during training but whose compositions have not. What mechanisms underlie this ability for compositional generalization? By reformulating multi-head attention as a hypernetwork, we reveal that a low-dimensional latent code specifies key-query specific operations. We find empirically that this latent code is highly structured, capturing information about the subtasks performed by the network. Using the framework of attention as a hypernetwork we further propose a simple modification of multi-head linear attention that strengthens the ability for compositional generalization on a range of abstract reasoning tasks. In particular, we introduce a symbolic version of the Raven Progressive Matrices human intelligence test on which we demonstrate how scaling model size and data enables compositional generalization and gives rise to a functionally structured latent code in the transformer.

Read more

6/11/2024