0

0

Explaining Explaining

    Published 9/30/2024 by Sergei Nirenburg, Marjorie McShane, Kenneth W. Goodman, Sanjay Oruganti

    Overview

    • Current AI systems are often "black boxes" that can't explain their decision-making.
    • The explainable AI (XAI) movement aims to make AI more interpretable, but it is limited by its focus on machine learning.
    • To achieve the level of explanation needed for high-stakes AI systems, a new approach is required.

    Plain English Explanation

    The paper argues that current AI systems, which are mostly based on machine learning, are often "black boxes" that can't explain how they arrived at their decisions. This lack of transparency can undermine people's trust and confidence in these systems, especially when they are used in high-stakes scenarios like healthcare or public policy.

    The explainable AI (XAI) movement has tried to address this problem by making AI systems more interpretable. However, the paper suggests that the XAI approach is limited because it is still committed to using machine learning, which inherently makes it difficult to provide the kinds of explanations that people need.

    To overcome these limitations, the paper proposes a hybrid approach that combines a knowledge-based infrastructure with machine learning. This would allow the AI system to provide more meaningful and understandable explanations to the humans who are ultimately responsible for the decisions and actions of the human-robot team.

    The paper illustrates this approach using a demonstration system where a team of simulated robots collaborates on a search task assigned by a human. The authors show how the "under-the-hood panels" of this system can provide detailed explanations of the robots' decision-making process, which could help build trust and facilitate better collaboration between humans and AI systems.

    Technical Explanation

    The paper proposes a hybrid approach to developing AI systems that combines a knowledge-based infrastructure with machine learning. This approach is meant to address the limitations of current explainable AI (XAI) systems, which are still based on machine learning and struggle to provide the level of explanation needed for high-stakes applications.

    The authors argue that to achieve the kinds of explanations required by real people operating in critical domains, we need to rethink how we approach AI development. Their proposed hybrid approach uses a knowledge-based system as the foundation, with machine learning used to supplement this knowledge base where applicable.

    The paper illustrates this approach using a demonstration system in which a team of simulated robots collaborates on a search task assigned by a human. The authors show how the "under-the-hood panels" of this system can provide detailed explanations of the robots' decision-making process, which could help build trust and facilitate better collaboration between humans and AI systems.

    Critical Analysis

    The paper acknowledges that the proposed hybrid approach is still conceptual and would require significant research and development to implement in practice. Some potential limitations or areas for further exploration include:

    • How to effectively integrate the knowledge-based and machine learning components to achieve the desired level of explanation and performance.
    • The scalability of the approach, as knowledge-based systems can become unwieldy as the complexity of the domain increases.
    • The potential for bias and lack of generalization in the knowledge-based components, which could undermine the system's reliability.
    • The challenge of keeping the knowledge base up-to-date and reflecting the latest developments in the domain.

    Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns or societal implications of deploying such high-stakes AI systems, even with improved explanatory capabilities. These are important considerations that should be carefully explored.

    Conclusion

    The paper presents a compelling argument for rethinking the way we approach the development of AI systems, particularly in high-stakes domains where transparency and explanation are critical. By combining a knowledge-based infrastructure with machine learning, the proposed hybrid approach aims to provide the level of explanation and understanding that human users require to have confidence in the decisions and actions of human-AI teams.

    While the concept is still theoretical, the demonstration system showcases the potential of this approach to facilitate more meaningful collaboration and trust between humans and AI. Further research and development will be necessary to realize the full potential of this hybrid approach and address the various challenges and limitations identified in the paper.

    Full paper

    Loading...

    Loading PDF viewer...

    Read original: arXiv:2409.18052



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Total Score

    0

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
    Total Score

    0

    The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations

    Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser

    Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.

    Read more

    5/29/2024

    Explainable AI needs formal notions of explanation correctness
    Total Score

    0

    Explainable AI needs formal notions of explanation correctness

    Stefan Haufe, Rick Wilming, Benedict Clark, Rustam Zhumagambetov, Danny Panknin, Ahc`ene Boubekki

    The use of machine learning (ML) in critical domains such as medicine poses risks and requires regulation. One requirement is that decisions of ML systems in high-risk applications should be human-understandable. The field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) seemingly addresses this need. However, in its current form, XAI is unfit to provide quality control for ML; it itself needs scrutiny. Popular XAI methods cannot reliably answer important questions about ML models, their training data, or a given test input. We recapitulate results demonstrating that popular XAI methods systematically attribute importance to input features that are independent of the prediction target. This limits their utility for purposes such as model and data (in)validation, model improvement, and scientific discovery. We argue that the fundamental reason for this limitation is that current XAI methods do not address well-defined problems and are not evaluated against objective criteria of explanation correctness. Researchers should formally define the problems they intend to solve first and then design methods accordingly. This will lead to notions of explanation correctness that can be theoretically verified and objective metrics of explanation performance that can be assessed using ground-truth data.

    Read more

    9/27/2024

    🗣️

    Total Score

    0

    From Black Boxes to Conversations: Incorporating XAI in a Conversational Agent

    Van Bach Nguyen, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert

    The goal of Explainable AI (XAI) is to design methods to provide insights into the reasoning process of black-box models, such as deep neural networks, in order to explain them to humans. Social science research states that such explanations should be conversational, similar to human-to-human explanations. In this work, we show how to incorporate XAI in a conversational agent, using a standard design for the agent comprising natural language understanding and generation components. We build upon an XAI question bank, which we extend by quality-controlled paraphrases, to understand the user's information needs. We further systematically survey the literature for suitable explanation methods that provide the information to answer those questions, and present a comprehensive list of suggestions. Our work is the first step towards truly natural conversations about machine learning models with an explanation agent. The comprehensive list of XAI questions and the corresponding explanation methods may support other researchers in providing the necessary information to address users' demands. To facilitate future work, we release our source code and data.

    Read more

    7/23/2024

    🤖

    Total Score

    0

    Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education

    Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy

    As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into educational environments, how can we ensure that these systems are both understandable and trustworthy? The growing demand for explainability in AI systems is a critical area of focus. This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape, emphasizing its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools, particularly through the innovative use of large language models (LLMs). What challenges arise in the implementation of explainable AI in educational contexts? This paper analyzes these challenges, addressing the complexities of AI models and the diverse needs of users. It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement, ensuring that educators and students can effectively interact with these technologies. Furthermore, what steps can educators, developers, and policymakers take to create more effective, inclusive, and ethically responsible AI solutions in education? The paper provides targeted recommendations to address this question, highlighting the necessity of prioritizing explainability. By doing so, how can we leverage AI's transformative potential to foster equitable and engaging educational experiences that support diverse learners?

    Read more

    10/29/2024