Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI

    Read original: arXiv:2409.18486 - Published 9/30/2024 by Tianyang Zhong, Zhengliang Liu, Yi Pan, Yutong Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Shizhe Liang, Zihao Wu, Yanjun Lyu, Peng Shu, Xiaowei Yu and 68 others

    🏷️

    Overview

    • This study comprehensively evaluates the performance of OpenAI's large language model, o1-preview, across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks.
    • The model demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance in areas ranging from coding challenges to scientific reasoning and from language processing to creative problem-solving.
    • Key findings include high success rates in solving complex programming problems, generating accurate radiology reports, solving high school-level math problems, and excelling in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields.

    Plain English Explanation

    The researchers tested a powerful artificial intelligence (AI) model, called o1-preview, created by OpenAI, to see how well it could handle a wide range of challenging tasks. They wanted to understand the model's capabilities and how it compared to human performance.

    The results were quite impressive. The o1-preview model was able to solve complex programming problems, generate detailed and accurate medical reports, solve high school-level math problems, and demonstrate advanced language understanding and reasoning skills across diverse fields like science, engineering, and finance.

    In many cases, the model's performance was on par with or even better than that of human experts. For example, it had an 83.3% success rate in solving difficult competitive programming problems, surpassing many human programmers. It also outperformed other AI models in generating coherent and accurate radiology reports.

    The model's strength seemed to lie in its ability to integrate knowledge and apply complex reasoning to solve intricate problems. While it did have some limitations, such as occasional errors on simpler tasks or challenges with highly specialized concepts, the overall results suggest significant progress towards the development of artificial general intelligence, which is the goal of creating AI systems that can match or exceed human-level performance across a wide range of cognitive abilities.

    Technical Explanation

    The researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of OpenAI's o1-preview large language model, assessing its performance across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks. These tasks spanned multiple domains, including computer science, mathematics, natural sciences, medicine, linguistics, and social sciences.

    Through rigorous testing, the researchers found that the o1-preview model demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance. For example, the model achieved an 83.3% success rate in solving complex competitive programming problems, surpassing many human experts. It also showed superior ability in generating coherent and accurate radiology reports, outperforming other evaluated models.

    In the domain of mathematics, the o1-preview model demonstrated 100% accuracy in high school-level reasoning tasks, providing detailed step-by-step solutions. The researchers also found the model to have advanced natural language inference capabilities across general and specialized domains, such as medicine.

    The model's performance was particularly impressive in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields. It excelled in chip design tasks, outperforming specialized models in areas like EDA script generation and bug analysis. The model also demonstrated remarkable proficiency in anthropology, geology, and quantitative investing, showcasing its comprehensive knowledge and statistical modeling skills.

    Additionally, the o1-preview model exhibited effective performance in social media analysis, including sentiment analysis and emotion recognition.

    While the researchers did observe some limitations, such as occasional errors on simpler problems and challenges with certain highly specialized concepts, the overall results indicate significant progress towards the development of artificial general intelligence.

    Critical Analysis

    The researchers acknowledge that the o1-preview model does have some limitations. For instance, it occasionally made errors on simpler problems and faced challenges with certain highly specialized concepts. Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the model's weaknesses or potential biases.

    Further research is needed to better understand the model's limitations and potential issues, particularly in areas where it may struggle or produce biased or inaccurate results. The researchers should also consider evaluating the model's performance on a wider range of tasks and in more diverse real-world scenarios to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.

    Despite these caveats, the study's findings are undoubtedly impressive and suggest significant progress towards the development of artificial general intelligence. The model's ability to excel in such a wide range of complex reasoning tasks, often surpassing human-level performance, is a remarkable achievement and a promising step forward in the field of AI.

    Conclusion

    This comprehensive study provides a detailed evaluation of OpenAI's o1-preview large language model, demonstrating its impressive capabilities across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks. The model's remarkable performance, often exceeding human-level abilities, suggests significant advancements towards the goal of artificial general intelligence.

    While the researchers acknowledge some limitations, the overall findings highlight the model's potential to revolutionize various industries and domains, from computer science and medicine to finance and social sciences. As the field of AI continues to evolve, studies like this one serve as important milestones, pushing the boundaries of what is possible and inspiring further research and development in the pursuit of truly intelligent systems.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Total Score

    0

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    🏷️

    Total Score

    0

    Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI

    Tianyang Zhong, Zhengliang Liu, Yi Pan, Yutong Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Shizhe Liang, Zihao Wu, Yanjun Lyu, Peng Shu, Xiaowei Yu, Chao Cao, Hanqi Jiang, Hanxu Chen, Yiwei Li, Junhao Chen, Huawen Hu, Yihen Liu, Huaqin Zhao, Shaochen Xu, Haixing Dai, Lin Zhao, Ruidong Zhang, Wei Zhao, Zhenyuan Yang, Jingyuan Chen, Peilong Wang, Wei Ruan, Hui Wang, Huan Zhao, Jing Zhang, Yiming Ren, Shihuan Qin, Tong Chen, Jiaxi Li, Arif Hassan Zidan, Afrar Jahin, Minheng Chen, Sichen Xia, Jason Holmes, Yan Zhuang, Jiaqi Wang, Bochen Xu, Weiran Xia, Jichao Yu, Kaibo Tang, Yaxuan Yang, Bolun Sun, Tao Yang, Guoyu Lu, Xianqiao Wang, Lilong Chai, He Li, Jin Lu, Lichao Sun, Xin Zhang, Bao Ge, Xintao Hu, Lian Zhang, Hua Zhou, Lu Zhang, Shu Zhang, Ninghao Liu, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong, Zhen Xiang, Yudan Ren, Jun Liu, Xi Jiang, Yu Bao, Wei Zhang, Xiang Li, Gang Li, Wei Liu, Dinggang Shen, Andrea Sikora, Xiaoming Zhai, Dajiang Zhu, Tianming Liu

    This comprehensive study evaluates the performance of OpenAI's o1-preview large language model across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks, spanning multiple domains, including computer science, mathematics, natural sciences, medicine, linguistics, and social sciences. Through rigorous testing, o1-preview demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance in areas ranging from coding challenges to scientific reasoning and from language processing to creative problem-solving. Key findings include: -83.3% success rate in solving complex competitive programming problems, surpassing many human experts. -Superior ability in generating coherent and accurate radiology reports, outperforming other evaluated models. -100% accuracy in high school-level mathematical reasoning tasks, providing detailed step-by-step solutions. -Advanced natural language inference capabilities across general and specialized domains like medicine. -Impressive performance in chip design tasks, outperforming specialized models in areas such as EDA script generation and bug analysis. -Remarkable proficiency in anthropology and geology, demonstrating deep understanding and reasoning in these specialized fields. -Strong capabilities in quantitative investing. O1 has comprehensive financial knowledge and statistical modeling skills. -Effective performance in social media analysis, including sentiment analysis and emotion recognition. The model excelled particularly in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields. While some limitations were observed, including occasional errors on simpler problems and challenges with certain highly specialized concepts, the overall results indicate significant progress towards artificial general intelligence.

    Read more

    9/30/2024

    A Systematic Assessment of OpenAI o1-Preview for Higher Order Thinking in Education
    Total Score

    0

    New!A Systematic Assessment of OpenAI o1-Preview for Higher Order Thinking in Education

    Ehsan Latif, Yifan Zhou, Shuchen Guo, Yizhu Gao, Lehong Shi, Matthew Nayaaba, Gyeonggeon Lee, Liang Zhang, Arne Bewersdorff, Luyang Fang, Xiantong Yang, Huaqin Zhao, Hanqi Jiang, Haoran Lu, Jiaxi Li, Jichao Yu, Weihang You, Zhengliang Liu, Vincent Shung Liu, Hui Wang, Zihao Wu, Jin Lu, Fei Dou, Ping Ma, Ninghao Liu, Tianming Liu, Xiaoming Zhai

    As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance, it demonstrates capabilities comparable to human intelligence, with significant potential to transform education and workforce development. This study evaluates OpenAI o1-preview's ability to perform higher-order cognitive tasks across 14 dimensions, including critical thinking, systems thinking, computational thinking, design thinking, metacognition, data literacy, creative thinking, abstract reasoning, quantitative reasoning, logical reasoning, analogical reasoning, and scientific reasoning. We used validated instruments like the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test and the Biological Systems Thinking Test to compare the o1-preview's performance with human performance systematically. Our findings reveal that o1-preview outperforms humans in most categories, achieving 150% better results in systems thinking, computational thinking, data literacy, creative thinking, scientific reasoning, and abstract reasoning. However, compared to humans, it underperforms by around 25% in logical reasoning, critical thinking, and quantitative reasoning. In analogical reasoning, both o1-preview and humans achieved perfect scores. Despite these strengths, the o1-preview shows limitations in abstract reasoning, where human psychology students outperform it, highlighting the continued importance of human oversight in tasks requiring high-level abstraction. These results have significant educational implications, suggesting a shift toward developing human skills that complement AI, such as creativity, abstract reasoning, and critical thinking. This study emphasizes the transformative potential of AI in education and calls for a recalibration of educational goals, teaching methods, and curricula to align with an AI-driven world.

    Read more

    10/30/2024

    A Preliminary Study of o1 in Medicine: Are We Closer to an AI Doctor?
    Total Score

    1

    A Preliminary Study of o1 in Medicine: Are We Closer to an AI Doctor?

    Yunfei Xie, Juncheng Wu, Haoqin Tu, Siwei Yang, Bingchen Zhao, Yongshuo Zong, Qiao Jin, Cihang Xie, Yuyin Zhou

    Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities across various domains and tasks, pushing the boundaries of our knowledge in learning and cognition. The latest model, OpenAI's o1, stands out as the first LLM with an internalized chain-of-thought technique using reinforcement learning strategies. While it has demonstrated surprisingly strong capabilities on various general language tasks, its performance in specialized fields such as medicine remains unknown. To this end, this report provides a comprehensive exploration of o1 on different medical scenarios, examining 3 key aspects: understanding, reasoning, and multilinguality. Specifically, our evaluation encompasses 6 tasks using data from 37 medical datasets, including two newly constructed and more challenging question-answering (QA) tasks based on professional medical quizzes from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and The Lancet. These datasets offer greater clinical relevance compared to standard medical QA benchmarks such as MedQA, translating more effectively into real-world clinical utility. Our analysis of o1 suggests that the enhanced reasoning ability of LLMs may (significantly) benefit their capability to understand various medical instructions and reason through complex clinical scenarios. Notably, o1 surpasses the previous GPT-4 in accuracy by an average of 6.2% and 6.6% across 19 datasets and two newly created complex QA scenarios. But meanwhile, we identify several weaknesses in both the model capability and the existing evaluation protocols, including hallucination, inconsistent multilingual ability, and discrepant metrics for evaluation. We release our raw data and model outputs at https://ucsc-vlaa.github.io/o1_medicine/ for future research.

    Read more

    9/24/2024

    On The Planning Abilities of OpenAI's o1 Models: Feasibility, Optimality, and Generalizability
    Total Score

    0

    On The Planning Abilities of OpenAI's o1 Models: Feasibility, Optimality, and Generalizability

    Kevin Wang, Junbo Li, Neel P. Bhatt, Yihan Xi, Qiang Liu, Ufuk Topcu, Zhangyang Wang

    Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks, but their effectiveness in planning remains underexplored. In this study, we evaluate the planning capabilities of OpenAI's o1 models across a variety of benchmark tasks, focusing on three key aspects: feasibility, optimality, and generalizability. Through empirical evaluations on constraint-heavy tasks (e.g., $textit{Barman}$, $textit{Tyreworld}$) and spatially complex environments (e.g., $textit{Termes}$, $textit{Floortile}$), we highlight o1-preview's strengths in self-evaluation and constraint-following, while also identifying bottlenecks in decision-making and memory management, particularly in tasks requiring robust spatial reasoning. Our results reveal that o1-preview outperforms GPT-4 in adhering to task constraints and managing state transitions in structured environments. However, the model often generates suboptimal solutions with redundant actions and struggles to generalize effectively in spatially complex tasks. This pilot study provides foundational insights into the planning limitations of LLMs, offering key directions for future research on improving memory management, decision-making, and generalization in LLM-based planning. Code available at https://github.com/VITA-Group/o1-planning.

    Read more

    10/15/2024