Enhancing LLM Problem Solving with REAP: Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting

    Read original: arXiv:2409.09415 - Published 9/17/2024 by Ryan Lingo, Martin Arroyo, Rajeev Chhajer
    Total Score

    2

    🔮

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, but improving their problem-solving capabilities for complex, reasoning-intensive tasks remains a challenge.
    • This paper introduces the REAP (Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting) method, an approach within the dynamic context generation framework.
    • REAP guides LLMs through reflection on the query, deconstructing it into manageable components, and generating relevant context to enhance the solution process.
    • The results demonstrate notable performance gains across multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, including a 112.93% improvement for GPT-4o-mini.
    • REAP also improves the clarity of model outputs, making it easier for humans to understand the reasoning behind the results.

    Plain English Explanation

    Large Language Models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text. While LLMs have transformed many areas of natural language processing, they still struggle with complex, reasoning-intensive tasks.

    The researchers behind this paper have developed a new approach called REAP (Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting) to help LLMs perform better on these challenging problems. REAP guides the models through a three-step process:

    1. Reflection: The LLM reflects on the original question or task to better understand what is being asked.
    2. Explicit Problem Deconstruction: The LLM breaks down the problem into smaller, more manageable components.
    3. Advanced Prompting: The LLM generates relevant context and information to help solve the problem, based on the previous steps.

    By using REAP, the researchers found that the performance of multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, including OpenAI's GPT-4o and GPT-4o-mini, improved significantly. For example, GPT-4o-mini saw a 112.93% increase in performance on the test tasks.

    Importantly, REAP also made the LLMs' outputs clearer and easier for humans to understand. This can help simplify the process of identifying and addressing any issues with the LLM's responses.

    Overall, the REAP method demonstrates the potential to greatly enhance the capabilities of LLMs, leading to better performance and increased cost-effectiveness across a wide range of applications.

    Technical Explanation

    The researchers evaluated the REAP method using a dataset designed to expose the limitations of LLMs. They compared the performance of six state-of-the-art models: OpenAI's o1-preview, o1-mini, GPT-4o, and GPT-4o-mini, as well as Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

    For the baseline (zero-shot) prompting, the models were given the original task or question. In the REAP-enhanced prompting, the models were guided through the three-step process of reflection, explicit problem deconstruction, and advanced prompting.

    The results showed notable performance gains across the board. For example, o1-mini improved by 40.97%, GPT-4o by 66.26%, and GPT-4o-mini by 112.93%. Even the already strong baseline performance of o1-preview saw modest gains.

    Interestingly, the researchers found that the cheaper GPT-4o-mini model, which is approximately 100 times less expensive than o1-preview, delivered competitive results when using the REAP method. This suggests that REAP can help improve the cost-efficiency of LLMs.

    Beyond the performance improvements, the researchers also found that REAP enhanced the clarity of the model outputs, making it easier for humans to understand the reasoning behind the results. This can simplify the process of identifying and addressing any issues with the LLM's responses.

    Critical Analysis

    The researchers acknowledge that the REAP method has some limitations. For example, the method requires additional computational resources to perform the reflection, problem deconstruction, and advanced prompting steps. This could be a concern for certain applications where speed and efficiency are critical.

    Additionally, the researchers note that the REAP method may not be equally effective across all types of tasks or problem domains. The dataset used in the study was designed to expose LLM limitations, and the researchers suggest that further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of REAP.

    It would also be interesting to see how REAP performs on more open-ended or creative tasks, where the problem-solving process may be less structured. The researchers mention that REAP could potentially be combined with other techniques, such as prompt recursive search or automatic prompt engineering, to further enhance LLM capabilities.

    Overall, the REAP method represents a promising approach to improving the problem-solving capabilities of LLMs, and the researchers have provided a solid foundation for further exploration and development in this area.

    Conclusion

    The REAP method introduced in this paper demonstrates the potential to significantly enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for complex, reasoning-intensive tasks. By guiding the models through a process of reflection, explicit problem deconstruction, and advanced prompting, the researchers were able to achieve notable performance gains across multiple state-of-the-art LLMs.

    Beyond the performance improvements, REAP also enhanced the clarity of the model outputs, making it easier for humans to understand the reasoning behind the results. This could simplify the process of identifying and addressing any issues with the LLM's responses, further improving their practical utility.

    The researchers have provided a compelling proof-of-concept for the REAP method, and their findings suggest that this approach could have widespread applications in areas where LLMs are deployed to tackle complex problems. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, techniques like REAP may play a crucial role in unlocking the full potential of these powerful AI systems.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    🔮

    Total Score

    2

    Enhancing LLM Problem Solving with REAP: Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting

    Ryan Lingo, Martin Arroyo, Rajeev Chhajer

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, yet improving their problem-solving capabilities, particularly for complex, reasoning-intensive tasks, remains a persistent challenge. This paper introduces the REAP (Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting) method, an innovative approach within the dynamic context generation framework. REAP guides LLMs through reflection on the query, deconstructing it into manageable components, and generating relevant context to enhance the solution process. We evaluated REAP using a dataset designed to expose LLM limitations, comparing zero-shot prompting with REAP-enhanced prompts across six state-of-the-art models: OpenAI's o1-preview, o1-mini, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. The results demonstrate notable performance gains, with o1-mini improving by 40.97%, GPT-4o by 66.26%, and GPT-4o-mini by 112.93%. Despite the already strong baseline performance of OpenAI's o1-preview, modest gains were observed. Beyond performance improvements, REAP offers a cost-effective solution; for example, GPT-4o-mini, which is approximately 100 times cheaper than o1-preview, delivered competitive results. REAP also improves the clarity of model outputs, making it easier for humans to understand the reasoning behind the results and simplifying the process of identifying and addressing any issues. These findings demonstrate REAP's potential to greatly improve the capabilities of LLMs, providing both better performance and increased cost-efficiency across a wide range of applications.

    Read more

    9/17/2024

    Prompt Recursive Search: A Living Framework with Adaptive Growth in LLM Auto-Prompting
    Total Score

    0

    Prompt Recursive Search: A Living Framework with Adaptive Growth in LLM Auto-Prompting

    Xiangyu Zhao, Chengqian Ma

    Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable proficiency in addressing a diverse array of tasks within the Natural Language Processing (NLP) domain, with various prompt design strategies significantly augmenting their capabilities. However, these prompts, while beneficial, each possess inherent limitations. The primary prompt design methodologies are twofold: The first, exemplified by the Chain of Thought (CoT), involves manually crafting prompts specific to individual datasets, hence termed Expert-Designed Prompts (EDPs). Once these prompts are established, they are unalterable, and their effectiveness is capped by the expertise of the human designers. When applied to LLMs, the static nature of EDPs results in a uniform approach to both simple and complex problems within the same dataset, leading to the inefficient use of tokens for straightforward issues. The second method involves prompts autonomously generated by the LLM, known as LLM-Derived Prompts (LDPs), which provide tailored solutions to specific problems, mitigating the limitations of EDPs. However, LDPs may encounter a decline in performance when tackling complex problems due to the potential for error accumulation during the solution planning process. To address these challenges, we have conceived a novel Prompt Recursive Search (PRS) framework that leverages the LLM to generate solutions specific to the problem, thereby conserving tokens. The framework incorporates an assessment of problem complexity and an adjustable structure, ensuring a reduction in the likelihood of errors. We have substantiated the efficacy of PRS framework through extensive experiments using LLMs with different numbers of parameters across a spectrum of datasets in various domains. Compared to the CoT method, the PRS method has increased the accuracy on the BBH dataset by 8% using Llama3-7B model, achieving a 22% improvement.

    Read more

    8/6/2024

    RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents
    Total Score

    0

    RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents

    Weizhe Chen, Sven Koenig, Bistra Dilkina

    In this past year, large language models (LLMs) have had remarkable success in domains outside the traditional natural language processing, and people are starting to explore the usage of LLMs in more general and close to application domains like code generation, travel planning, and robot controls. Connecting these LLMs with great capacity and external tools, people are building the so-called LLM agents, which are supposed to help people do all kinds of work in everyday life. In all these domains, the prompt to the LLMs has been shown to make a big difference in what the LLM would generate and thus affect the performance of the LLM agents. Therefore, automatic prompt engineering has become an important question for many researchers and users of LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel method, textsc{RePrompt}, which does gradient descent to optimize the step-by-step instructions in the prompt of the LLM agents based on the chat history obtained from interactions with LLM agents. By optimizing the prompt, the LLM will learn how to plan in specific domains. We have used experiments in PDDL generation and travel planning to show that our method could generally improve the performance for different reasoning tasks when using the updated prompt as the initial prompt.

    Read more

    6/18/2024

    APEER: Automatic Prompt Engineering Enhances Large Language Model Reranking
    Total Score

    0

    APEER: Automatic Prompt Engineering Enhances Large Language Model Reranking

    Can Jin, Hongwu Peng, Shiyu Zhao, Zhenting Wang, Wujiang Xu, Ligong Han, Jiahui Zhao, Kai Zhong, Sanguthevar Rajasekaran, Dimitris N. Metaxas

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced Information Retrieval (IR) across various modules, such as reranking. Despite impressive performance, current zero-shot relevance ranking with LLMs heavily relies on human prompt engineering. Existing automatic prompt engineering algorithms primarily focus on language modeling and classification tasks, leaving the domain of IR, particularly reranking, underexplored. Directly applying current prompt engineering algorithms to relevance ranking is challenging due to the integration of query and long passage pairs in the input, where the ranking complexity surpasses classification tasks. To reduce human effort and unlock the potential of prompt optimization in reranking, we introduce a novel automatic prompt engineering algorithm named APEER. APEER iteratively generates refined prompts through feedback and preference optimization. Extensive experiments with four LLMs and ten datasets demonstrate the substantial performance improvement of APEER over existing state-of-the-art (SoTA) manual prompts. Furthermore, we find that the prompts generated by APEER exhibit better transferability across diverse tasks and LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/jincan333/APEER.

    Read more

    6/21/2024